What books would you say are essential reading for anyone who wishes to follow the path of gloriousness and take the...

use u-block origin? i guess he still gets views but he will only get money when people see the ads

anyway most of youtube has been demonetized so you probably won't even get ads without u-block origin

>He occasionally talks about evola and guillaume faye
probably hasn't read them, some of his better read friends like Survive The Jive must have told him about it

He took a picture of himself reading The Path of Cinnabar on his instagram, which is funny since Evola heavily criticizes nationalism in it and he's Mr "Swedeeeish Nashyonalism"

>hahaha he's really funny! I like watching his videos haha!
>haha I don't want to support him bc of a belief he has!

Nice schizophrenia.

>I like his humour but I don't want to support his political views
>shizophrenia

In a way, yeah, especially considering pretty much every one of his videos is about nationalism, so if you find that to be a bad thing, I don't get how you could withstand his videos.

This guy is hilarious. I sometimes watch his videos because his accent cracks me up.

Just because an idea is harmful or stupid doesn't mean the presentation of it can't be funny. It's how Mr Cheeto got into the white house, just unlike Trumps "it sounds like a parody but is actually serious" vibes, The Golden One got this charismatic and naive innocence about him, which creates such a great comedic effect given the messages. Kinda like watching a cartoon with explicit adult themes.

Now actively supporting something like that which probably isn't a parody, is quite a dilemma. And uBlock doesn't block all ads either way (and the ones you skip create more money)

Dunno, watching him play Skyrim and pretend the people he's killing are leftists is pretty hilarious in a sad-cringe sort of way.

yes, the golden one and varg have something innocent about them... then it turns out they unironically believe the craziest shit

Most people find violence a bad thing too and yet there is a lot humour focused on over the top violence. Humour is all about unexpected twists and often about breaking taboos and talking about otherwise not socially acceptable subjects. The only difference with the guy is that it's not advertised as humour. But neither is Twilight or 50 Shades and both work pretty well if you watch them through the lens of comedy.

kekekek pls link

I've only watched a few of his videos, but isn't his basic message: "Sweden should stay for the Swedish. Europe should stay for the Europeans"?

How is this something bad in any way?

youtube.com/watch?v=eve0VlL1lZw
He has a whole series of these.

that's ok, i have no love for globalism, but he unironically praises hitler

So? Hitler's vision for Europe would have been a paradise compared to what it looks like now, unless you were Russian at least and in the way of lebensraum.

And? He is a nice guy who just disagrees about a long dead dictator. He is not some skinhead stereotype who wants to gas people.

Which begs the question: "What happens with people who disagree, and especially non Swedish/European people who disagree?"
Nazism often starts with an innocent idea or two before going batshit.

Hitler didn't want to gas anyone at start either.

>Hitler's vision for Europe would have been a paradise compared to what it looks like now

There's no way you'll avoid conflict in this world. If you could choose between Europeans and European civilization peacefully disappearing in a tide of globalist culture/brown race, or Europeans reclaiming their own futures but also at the cost of much blood, which would you choose?

>the only alternative to mass migration is national socialism
This is why /pol/ should stay on /pol/.

Or a religious minority.
Or disagreed with the state.
Or participated in something the state deemed deviant or degenerate.
Or happened to have a Jewish ancestor in there somewhere.
Or said something the Gestapo didn't like.
Or disagreed with the state.
Or got drafted and froze to death on the Russian frontier.
Or decided that genociding literally everyone who isn't a member of the Reich was a bad idea.
Or disagreed with the state.
Or hung your portrait of Hitler crooked and upset the Gestapo members surveilling your home.
Or ended up on the wrong end of one of the many internal power struggles that tend to plague totalitarian governments.
Or ended up on the wrong end of a new racial law designed to target new ethnic minorities now that the Jews are gone.
Or spoke positively of someone who previously ended up on the wrong end of an internal power struggle.
Or disagreed with the state.
Or...

You get the point.

>There's no way you'll avoid conflict in this world.
There was non relevant one in Western Europe for almost a century now, which is historically pretty rare.

As for the option, the peaceful one obviously. Not like it's a question in reality either way but if you prefer genocide as a solution, perhaps you should rethink a thing or two, and trying to interact with people.

>a tide of globalist culture/brown race
>Europeans reclaiming their own futures
Jesus are you retarded. Noone is forcing you to follow a certain cultural movement. The nazis did.
Noone is forcing you to race mix or who to marry or be friends with.
>reclaiming their own futures
They do. The majority of european people vote for this type of politic. Your only complaint is that people disagree with you. And here we are at the heart of why all these ideologies turn shit. As put it.

Restrict immigration so they won't be here in the first place, stir up nationalist pride to curtail the self-hatred of europeans.
And unironically repeal Women's voting rights because that's were this spawned, even center right people who have studied the topic and don't want to break taboos have to hint at it

Yeah...arguments from the far right stop making much sense if you don't have a crippling terror of brown people.

Or an annoying hedonist faggot

>And unironically repeal Women's voting rights
Uhh, oh. You just disagreed with the nazis. Enjoy your stay in a concentration camp.

>everybody who disagrees with me needs to lose their rights
>stop calling me fascist

That's a very poor way to answer the question, and I was not necessarily implying that National Socialism, or something like it, is the only alternative. Still, something authoritative is I believe the only way to move out of this, and I'd say you're naive if you think it can be peacefully done. So, which would you prefer? Globalism or some conflict?

Lots of this was exacerbated by the war, where all sides became unceasingly nasty, and a lot of what you wrote out is hyperbole in general. Should I list out the Allied crimes, the crimes of Bolshevism, or how about the crimes of English and American capitalism and imperialism? Ignoring communism completely, I'd argue America alone has done more harm to this world than even if Germany did all its purported to have done were true.

>Should I list out the Allied crimes, the crimes of Bolshevism, or how about the crimes of English and American capitalism and imperialism?
yes, but only the bolsheviks and the nazis needed slave labor to fuel their society

>or some conflict
>some conflict
>You know that minor disagreement where we will murder 10s of millions of people who were born and raised here because they don't have white skin. And also everyone who disagrees with us.
Yeah I'll pick the free society with rule of law

No one said anything about genocide, just bloodshed. Yes, I would much prefer it (bloodshed) over a globalized world, which offers little or no more room for evolution, collectively or individually. You're like the bleeding hearts that save Africa or India, and in return for your thinking you are doing good, you create conditions of endless slums and insufferable conditions.

So which room for evolution do you not have that you'd have under national socialism?

Is that shield just very tiny or is he a big guy?

>to move out of this
"This" being only of an issue for you.

>I'd argue America alone has done more harm to this world than even if Germany did all its purported to have done were true.
I won't necessary disagree but Germany did a lot good by showing how insane the whole idea is, which helped with progress. Besides, US of A helped to restore Germany, parts of Europe and Japan, which improved lives for millions of people. Nazis only caused damage to society.

It's not like the "die or work" of capitalism in Murica is any that different.

>your thinking you are doing good, you create conditions of endless slums and insufferable conditions.
Globalism isn't causing these issues. Unregulated, exploitative globalism does.

Yeah...dictatorships don't tend to have much room for social chance and evolution other than the inevitable implosion of the system once people get sick enough of the wanton corruption and brutality that are endemic in such systems.

And something tells me that that would be plenty bloody as well.

Nobody asked you to stop calling other people fascists. Being called a fascist is really only offensive to limp-wristed, daddy issues faggots who take pride in their submissive bitch nature

>daddy issues faggots who take pride in their submissive bitch nature
Sounds like your average fascist.

You know a system is indefensible when you have to engage in blatant whataboutism.

Also, kinda funny that you guys always think you'll be the ones loading up the train-cars and not the other way around. In dictatorships you aren't an individual. You don't have rights, no matter how good at goose stepping you are. You're willingly reducing yourself to a cog in a machine, to be replaced when it's convenient. Why would you do that to yourself?

>violently asserting your will on others is an act of submission

>do not criticise the government
>do not hold ideologies beyond the governments
>do not form clubs or organisations who oppose the government
>you are nothing your people is everything
>do not hold philosophies except those by the government
>practice religion or the lack thereof only in accordance with the government
>the party elite is above the law
>if you're born outside the accepted group die
>only consume the art the government likes
>get drafted into a lost war to pity the führer's pride and get your children shot for deserting
>Being called a fascist is really only offensive to limp-wristed, daddy issues faggots who take pride in their submissive bitch nature
Well you don't sound overcompensating at all

Only your leaders do it. Unless you happen to lick enough ass to get promoted high enough, and managed not to get disposed, you're just going to be a little faggot following orders from above, and slapped like a bitch (in base case scenario) if you don't.

Fascist sound like right libertarian kiddies, who think they'll be millionaires once ze evul state stops ze evul regulations.

There's a Hitler speech where he mocks the idea of women voting so I don't know where you got that but based on my single anecdote I'll have to disagree

I really dislike black and white thinkers. You all are so emotional in your rhetoric - it's not always one extreme or the other. No one said anything about killing 10s of millions of nonwhites or those who don't agree with you. Are you nonwhite and having a reaction or something to a white man talking about not wanting his race to go extinct or become powerless?

I've not even said if I'd call myself a National Socialist or not, or what I think about the ideology in general, other than I believe it would have been a better Europe than what it is at present. You realize much of the world had a great respect for NS Germany before the war?

Collectively on the speciation (race) level for one, as miscegenation would not be pushed. And eugenics works, even though NatSoc Germany eugenics was actually pretty tame compared to what was being practiced in America. I think a world of quality over quantity is in great need, otherwise humans breed way too much with all this modern medicine at our disposal and abuse the planet. As for the individual, they were trying to form a society in which the individual could excel through their own merit and not be limited by their class. Hitler mentions multiple times how all the class barriers stop the individual genius from reaching his true potential. NS is a collectivist ideology insofar as the individual growth does not hurt the whole. On paper, it's a brilliant philosophy, but we don't know how it would really have turned out in the long run.

>Nazis only caused damage to society

I think pre-war Germany greatly disagrees with you, as well as leading figures across Europe at the time and a number of third world countries that were taking inspiration from them and forming new trade agreements.

The central principle of fascism is that your government represents your will. You aren't submitting to the government, you are extrapolating your assertive potential by joining with others (as in a fasces)

Living under a fascist government is only an act of submission if you're a socially toxic individual.

this hooktube.com

Constitutional Monarchy is the answer. That way your country is guided by god and aristocratic representatives, not the idiotic masses

>You're willingly reducing yourself to a cog in the machine.

I'd say that's the case for our present-day societies, and that you've never really read fascist thought in detail if that's what you think it's all about. You copy the same hollywood rhetoric. Read Corneliu Zelea Codreanu's For my Legionaries, Giovanni Gentile, and Hitler's Table Talks if you want to get a good idea of what it was really about.

youtube.com/watch?v=zRlfbUr852o

It's this one. He thought it degraded them to be in politics.

I wouldn't be surprised, obviously nazis aren't found of emancipation of women, but at the same time they were a crucial part of their voter base. Check their propaganda.

>pre-war Germany
A temporary state in preparation for war, that wouldn't work without the war and that lasted couple years before miserably collapsing. Germany before WW1 and after WW2 did just fine without nazis.

>I've not even said if I'd call myself a National Socialist or not, or what I think about the ideology in general

You're not fooling anyone Fritz.

>Are you nonwhite
The only response /pol/ has. Why not call me a libtard kike shill numale cuck while you're at it?
>You all are so emotional in your rhetoric
I mocked you downplaying ethnic cleansing to little conflict. Since the other /pol/ tard is bragging about imposing his will on others and you embrace bloodshed as long as it means your worldview trumps the democratic results and your historic role model did the same I'd say it's a fairly rational assumption.

>in which the individual could excel through their own merit and not be limited by their class
Yeah fuck today's class system. It is noted that you didn't mention any individual freedom.

As for eugenics you want to revoke the right to choose your partner freely by the instincts for spouse selection nature gave you and the right to practice eugenics privately to whatever degree you like to have an ideologically driven form of it that forbids key aspects of eugenics such as diversifying the gene pool or mixing with high intelligence outsiders.
>individual growth does not hurt the whole
By the interpretation of the party.
In all of that your only complaint is that people disagree with you. There's more whites today than at Hitler's time. Get a white gf and make all the eugenic babies you want.

>it's a brilliant philosophy
It's really not.

>but we don't know how it would really have turned out in the long run.
We do know enough.

>Living under a fascist government is only an act of submission if you're a socially toxic individual
You might wanna look up what groups were all persecuted by the Nazis. If your definition of socially toxic individual means all nonfascists then no thanks.

> that's the case for our present-day societies
You don't have to follow the party line and live in fear about getting murdered for arbitrary reasons. Hell, you're even free to bitch about the state of things and organise with people who think like you. You're free to live your life in any way you want as long it doesn't harm others.

Not like even being a facist would save one from submission. The nazi infighting would make the left in Russia look peaceful and reasoned.

>all we want to do is kill everybody who disagrees with us and force everybody to form their entire lives aound our fascist ideals
>why do these beta leftists prefer to live in a democracy with rule of law rather than my utopia
Yeah we need stricter moderation on Veeky Forums. This /pol/ shit is getting out of hand.

Frankly, I'm uninterested in reading fascism apologetics when the real world consequences of the system are out there for anyone to look at. And they're bad. Universally, unequivocally bad.

I'd like to invite you to think upon what would happen to you if you were to speak out against the government of your ideal system. To call for their removal or say they're a bunch of corrupt pigs. What would happen to you if you were to do that under a fascist government as opposed to a democratic one?

I don't know about you, but it gives me a sense of comfort to know that I'm not likely to be imprisoned or murdered for speaking out against my elected officials. There's a real debate to be had over just how much impact any one person can have over a democratic system, but at least I won't be thrown into a concentration camp for thumbing my nose at the President.

>All we want to do is kill anyone who disagrees with us
>He thinks generation identity is that radical
All they want to do is stop immigration into Europe and in the West in general , and deport people who aren't of their heritage. Who said anything about genocide?
>Anyone who is even slightly reactionary wants to genocide the whole world
user plz

Friendly reminders to nazis what nazis tend to do with other nazis: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

>those legs

This is not how I pictured Odysseus, lads

>Authoritarianism is bad because fascism is objectively bad
>Objectively bad
Sure thing. Say what did democracies do to prevent the rise of communism? Oh yeah.
Nothing

>deporting people who are fleeing from wars we supported back to war zones
Yeah, they'll be fine.

that's cultural appropriation

The people who are advocating national socialism and bloodshed in this thread for all nonfascists and violent deportation of all born outside their defined group.

>Anyone who is even slightly reactionary wants to genocide the whole world
I didn't say that. But the people itt actually argued for that so nice going shooting yourself in the foot with your strawman. I guess that's your way to agree with me

That was the best part of the Nazis, when communists tried to infiltrate and disrupt their meetings they actually did something besides hide behind the police

Sure
>Muh genocide
But at least they did something besides sit their and be conquered through internal self destruction caused by leftist agitators

With every post /pol/ makes outside of /pol/ they embarrass themselves

> Hell, you're even free to bitch about the state of things and organise with people who think like you
This is really only true for leftists, who are awarded the privilege of expression and organization by their liberal masters in exchange for acting as their brownshirts. Leftists disrupt the formation and preservation of distinct cultures and communities, and liberals swoop in to cater to individual consumer needs

However, if you dare to express opposition to the multicultural shopping mall of the future, or if you share scientific observations about the reality of human difference, suddenly your 'freedom to bitch and organize' is nowhere to be found

>wars we supported back to war zones
>Because all the migrants are from Syria
So all those fags from Turkey, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Pakistan, Eritrea, and such can all go back? Sounds good to me

Hey remember when they weren't called migrants but refugees? I do! We should send them back then make sure that the government who are starting the wars then trying to flood labor markets with cheap labor to drive down wages aren't in power.

I don't speak that way, and don't like going on /pol/. There's too many people, morons, and shill operations. The reason I asked if you were nonwhite was to better understand your psychology.

You put so many words in my mouth, and I wrote out a long response to you, but it's not worth it. We will never see eye to eye if you think democracy is a good system, unlimited free choice is a good thing, or if you think multiculturalism will propel us to the stars.

>You're free to live your life as long as it doesn't harm others

That is not the case for countries with hate speech and holocaust denial laws. It will probably not be the case for America much longer either (10-15 years), if I'm any judge.

You are already jailed or fined if you criticize jewish power in many European countries, charged with hate speech in Canada, Australia, and England, and just 2 weeks ago in America they proposed a bill to make it ILLEGAL to boycott Israeli goods. We are already moving in the direction you fear. I'd much rather have a government that was honest about itself.

As for what you're saying about the fascist times, I say desperate times call for desperate measures. Germany was in such a rut in the Wiemar period they needed that dictatorship and single vision of will to get out of it. It wasn't meant to stay like that forever. The question is would it have? We will never know. There were Ceasars of times past that were given absolute rule for times of need, and then successfully relinquished their power when the deed was done, and then also those that would not and caused lots of trouble.

>However, if you dare to express opposition to the multicultural shopping mall of the future, or if you share scientific observations about the reality of human difference, suddenly your 'freedom to bitch and organize' is nowhere to be found
Yeah right... except that organisations that literally unironically call themselves right wing death squads are allowed and half of twitter is racist and encouraging violence against the left

>fleeing from wars
*looking for handouts
>we supported
Speak for yourself

how far are you willing to go with deporting people who aren't natives? would an english person with a french surname be deported to france?

Levels of whataboutism this intense shouldn't be possible. Yet here we are.

And given that we live in a world with...lemme check real quick...a whopping five communist nations left in it (and China is pretty debatable given that it seems to slowly be evolving into command capitalism) I'd say that communism as an ideology has been beaten down pretty good. By democracies funnily enough.

>The US did anything to prevent the rise of Communism
You couldn't even stop Vietnam from becoming communist, not only that but you illegally bombed Cambodia leading to the rise of the Khmer Rouge and, before all of that, let Alger Hiss (a Soviet Spy)
>In 1944, Hiss was named Director of the Office of Special Political Affairs, a policy-making entity devoted to planning for post-war international organizations, Hiss served as executive secretary[20] of the Dumbarton Oaks Conference, which drew up plans for the future United Nations. In November 1944, Hull, who had led the United Nations project, retired as Secretary of State due to poor health and was succeeded by Undersecretary of State Edward Stettinius.

He even influenced policy on the Yalta Conference ffs

Why the fuck is it northern europes responsability to house Islamic migrants from Syria? Why?

Just deport non-essential non-europeans. So in other words, if you aren't part of the top 10% of productive migrants you're going back.

All of this a pipe dream, of course, but it sure beats all the ethnic conflict all this immigration is going to bring in the future.

It's part of their constitution. And the elected governments enact it with consent of the populace

Mate, that can equally be said of the left on the twittersphere. As for saying you think multiculturalism is a bad idea or that races are different won't get you in trouble in public, you can't honestly be this disingenuous can you? Those are some of the most taboo things you could possibly say. I myself said I thought multiculturalism was actually the end of all diversity in the long run in a study group, and was practically tarred and feathered.

He sounds pretty far gone off the leftist deep end, I wouldn't engage him

Nigga, even the literal nazis had right to protest in Murica. If you're a bit more subtle with it like "I dun want dem immigrants" you're free to protest in every other Western country too. And vote for anti immigrant parties.

>That is not the case for countries with hate speech and holocaust denial laws.
Alright, you're not free to say couple things but it's still no where similar to the oppression you'd get in fascist states, where saying ANYTHING someone with authority disagrees with, would have massive consequences.

>we
typical sheep

>that can equally be said of the left on the twittersphere
Correct. YOU claimed only the left can do it.

>As for saying you think multiculturalism is a bad idea or that races are different won't get you in trouble in public, you can't honestly be this disingenuous can you?
It is objectively allowed and anti immigration parties poll around 20%. Who of us is disingenious?

>I myself said I thought multiculturalism was actually the end of all diversity in the long run in a study group, and was practically tarred and feathered.
Laws don't matter. Facts don't matter. user felt oppressed by people hate-disagreeing with him. Compared to the libertarian paradise the natsocs itt propose truely a university study group looking at a person weird is a nightmare.

Your country did it, whether you personally agreed with it or not is irrelevant when we talk about international problems.

I voted AfD yesterday. Fucking /pol/tards.

>Those are some of the most taboo things you could possibly say.
It's honestly like some sort of egalitarian religion. Anyone who questions the long term legitimacy of their values is branded a heretic and shunned rather than reasoned with. Whats worse is that these liberal types are often sheltered and believe in this ridiculous stereotypes of other people and cultures
>Oh look at these brave brown people trying to come here to fight white supremacy
>They're so exotic and exciting , we should just allow them all to come here to integrate into our culture!
Which assumes that every kind of immigrant populations is going to suddenly forsake all of their heritage, history, culture, etc once they come here and see the "superior" way to live. Then they will all magically get along with each other.

What makes me laugh about the far-right is that most of the ones who are the most upset about the refugee crisis tend to be Americans who have no connection to Europe beyond an intense terror of brown people.

Truth is, most of the Europeans know that the refugee crisis is just that: another crisis to be overcome. For instance, the German election ought to be a pretty good referendum on the effects on the refugee crisis and the top two parties are both pro-refugee and got something like 55% of the vote.

Far-right ideas simply aren't popular.

I think your "massive consequences" are overblown, but anyhow, I disagree again. It's choose your poisons, user. You can disagree with political correctness in liberal democracies (which is destroying your culture, race, and country), and suffer the consequences of potentially losing your job, your friends, family, and going to jail if you breach certain topics; or you could have been severely warned in an official capacity about what your activities of criticism against the state would lead to if it wasn't all that disruptive, or jailed or put in a work camp if bad.

BOTH are states imposing their will on the people. The former is just more open and honest about it; the latter has crafted a culture of self-policing censorship, brainwashing, and some legislation to keep people in line.

>Communism fell eventually, it just killed millions of people and collapsed on it's on while we did nothing
Yeah , and if someone hasn't done something they would've conquered all of Europe and killed millions more.

Your welcome

He made a few videos recommending his favorite shitty fantasy books, check them out.