Kek

Kek

maybe she'll actually off herself this time

"No!"

>otter
pleb

>Misusing the word "solipsistic" instead of using the proper term "egocentric"
>Because liberals are never egocentric
Give me ONE REASON why I should respect her as an author

J.K. Rowling is NOT literature get this shit the FUCK off of my board

What are her political views? Is she just your average social democrat?

good thread

but that's a walruse

further to the left, champagne socialist

>Stop talking about literature on Veeky Forums
No

Was waiting for the Canadian

Didn't she oppose Corbyn?
More hyper Liberal

hope not... i want to fug her first

well yeah Corbyn is a literal communist which rich folk don't like, but she is still pretty far left

>Incompetent clowns
She's right about this.

such a stunning insight she just HAD to pin it

damn, too bad she doesn't have billions of dollars and a dozen mansions to cheer her up or anything.

Corbyn believes in bourgeois democracy, though. How is he a communist?

You can blame Canada on that one, too.

He's a demsoc, he believes that socialism must come from democratic means. This is in direct opposition to Marxism , where the only way for socialism to come about is via a revolution. He still advocates for the workers becoming their own owners, he just has a different method to get there.

That's too simple though. The ones in power are experts in strategically not resolving issues so they can drum up political donors and rally bases to maintain their position.

Has social democracy ever produced collectivisation of property?

So he's basically a Fabian? Jesus Christ Britain, get it together

He's like an old school fabian, now the fabians are basically 'unless they're killing the poor, in the street, by the thousands I don't wished to be disturbed from my qualls egg blinis'

The alternative to corbyn at the moment seems to be kicking a child in the face so its what option do we have?

LITERALLY SHAKING

>falling for the Chomskyan deception

Either choice is trash. Might as well just not vote.

she's right tho
also otters are cool

>the "youre just partisan" argument

She's still bitching about Corbyn? Good lord. Is there are cure for centrism?

Which everyone with half a brain would notice. Just if you're the most influential writer of the 21th century, kinda-somewhat-almost a billionaire and a person followed by millions, surely she could've used her power for something that goes beyond "lol, Maybot is stupid"?

You can't unironically defend this thread being posted on Veeky Forums.

nothing has other than ethno-religious homogeneity. lefties btfo.

She is a self proclaimed Marxist. She just wants to spread cultural marxism

No, and according to hardcore Marxists the only time socialism has been achieved was in Republican Spain and in the Free Territory of Ukraine, but that is according to ancoms, of course

>hardcore Marxists
*Communists, Marxism and communism is not synonymous. I Keep making that mistake

She's a fan of a Marxist but her politics are liberal/centrist, even right of Corbyn.

she literally voted for lib dem

when is someone finally going to post the copypasta?

Marxists would take away her castle and fancy cars.

Should we send it to JK Rowling? I really want to see her reaction.

>blarites
>far left

She's the epitome of a Neoliberal shill. She's not wrong about the personality cult though, she's just angry she's lost hers

She's a centre-left neoliberal. Now go back to your containment board.

the center left and the radical left agree where it matters, that is, they agree about indoctrinating children with islam and gay ideology

You're a genuine retard if you believe this. That's like saying the centre right want a fascist government because the far right wants one.

and thats no lie

She comes off as a clown to people here, but she's actually an incredibly adaptable and empathetic (not as far as empathy describes support, but understanding and internalizing others' emotions) person. Harry Potter sold consistently well not just because of the world, but because that world, and Harry, aged with the readers. Now that it's gone she's still tapping bloodline of youth culture for continued exposure by saying exactly what they want to hear. I fully doubt she believes in or cares about American, or hell even British, politics at all, but the children who were with Harry are now the children who were with Hillary and if Rowling says she is too they'll keep throwing money at her.

Reminder that Rees-Mogg will eventually be PM and then Rowling will off herself. It's a matter of when, not if.

>I fully doubt she believes in or cares about American, or hell even British, politics at all
Why would you think that? Just because shit is unlikely to affect her personally now doesn't mean she wouldn't show no interest for something so universal. She might not care enough to read political texts and the likes but interest in politics is pretty natural for almost every person. Probably even more so when you have the time to shitpost on twitter.

>the center left and the radical left agree where it matters
The radical left would have the center left executed, m8. Identity politics aren't radical left.

In what way is she misusing the word?

Just because the other poster doesn't know what it means doesn't mean he's lying.