What do you guys think of her and her writings?

What do you guys think of her and her writings?

Scientology sci fi crap

>scientology
>sci-f
>ayn rand being either of those things
???

Basically school-girl-with-daddy-issues trash

god-tier philosophy

shit-tier writing

fucking kys

>liked by paul ryan
dropped

dude light bulbs lmao

I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship. Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect. For by the grace given to me I say to everyone among you not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think with sober judgment, each according to the measure of faith that God has assigned. For as in one body we have many members, and the members do not all have the same function, so we, though many, are one body in Christ, and individually members one of another.

Typical crazy Jewess with some Nazi/Aryan obsession.

"Her ideal physical types were tall, blond, muscular men and delicate, graceful blonde women—she herself was small, dark, and never at ease with her body."

>nazi obsession
>philosophy rejects fascism completely
>putting this much arbitrary emphasis on race insteas of the actual content of her books and philosophy
What
>jewess
Oh, that explains your obsession with race. >>/pol/

You have much profound information to give about God, and have for thousands of years “searched the depths of the Godhead,” and looked into its heart, so that you can doubtless tell us how God himself attends to “God’s cause,” which we are called to serve. And you do not conceal the Lord’s doings, either. Now, what is his cause? Has he, as is demanded of us, made an alien cause, the cause of truth or love, his own? You are shocked by this misunderstanding, and you instruct us that God’s cause is indeed the cause of truth and love, but that this cause cannot be called alien to him, because God is himself truth and love; you are shocked by the assumption that God could be like us poor worms in furthering an alien cause as his own. “Should God take up the cause of truth if he were not himself truth?” He cares only for his cause, but, because he is all in all, therefore all is his cause! But we, we are not all in all, and our cause is altogether little and contemptible; therefore we must “serve a higher cause.” — Now it is clear, God cares only for what is his, busies himself only with himself, thinks only of himself, and has only himself before his eyes; woe to all that is not well-pleasing to him. He serves no higher person, and satisfies only himself. His cause is — a purely egoistic cause.

>God cares only for what is his
>thinks only of himself
So a father who cares for their child is only thinking of himself?

Yes. It pleases him to care for his child; he delights in the delight of his offspring.

Oh look, it's the 10th Ayn Rand thread this week

Didn't you read the quote after that? I never said she was a fascist you imbecile. I also don't get why you're calling me a poltard. The Jewish woman comment was in regards to the quote after that. I don't really care about Jews to be frank with you.

>to be frank
hue

Dr. Sadler compared her to Bertrand Russell when it comes philosophical analysis

That's pretty damning.

>god-tier philosophy
You have to be over the age of 18 to post here

>God
>taking care of his children

stellar rebuttal, my guy
only fucking about but I'm really interested in knowing why you think so.

>god tier philosophy
>genuinely thinks the most capable people are at the top and that capitalism is faultless
>not just a base brainlet that swung far in one direction because she saw the worst the other direction had to offer
>tries to mask her poorly thought out ideas in things like objectivity

Why wouldn't the most capable people gravitate towards the top in a capitalist society? Those who accumulate wealth in a capitalist society do so by pleasing large numbers of people with the products or services that they sell. The more capable you are of providing those services and creating products the better off you'll be financially.

>Why wouldn't the most capable people gravitate towards the top in a capitalist society?
This isn't the case she presents. She assumes that it's borderline universal, while circumstance plays at least as big a part, as does nepotism

Who says the circumstances surrounding a persons birth and development don't play a part in the resulting capability? You're talking about the things that go into making somebody capable as if this contradicts the original premise of the most capable people rising to the top.

>god-tier philosophy

bad.

I miss the days when ayn rand was b& for discussion on Veeky Forums.

meritocracy can and never will exist.

you are not a randian hero. You are a fucktard on the internet

What the hell are you even saying?

This woman, in my country she is everything.

I'm glad she exists because the Bioshock video game was neat. That's it.

"if a man allows himself to do something he knows is wrong, even once, then it's just a matter of time..."

a matter of time until what?

part of me likes her unforgiving morality but i feel like ayn rand is one of those things that's kinda cool to read about when you're 18-22 but has little relationship/parallel with reality

so this is what projecting looks like.

>God

because why focus on the actual merit when you can just focus on your socialising skills and connections to get to the higher positions

>meritocracy can and never will exist.
cit needed

There was a time like this?

Did someone say my name?

MORE RELEVANT NOW THAN EVER BEFORE SHE IS THE UNDENIABLE PROFIT OF THE FUTURE DOWN WITH THE LOOTERS EVERY HARD WORKING INTELLIGENT PERSON IS PHYSICALLY ATTRACTIVE 75+ PAGE SPEACHES REITERATING SELF EVIDENT FACTS REPEATEDLY ARISTOTLE I LOVE YOUR COCK—

I'm not kidding friends she literally put a curse on a guy's dick

>class

The ability to socialize and network is part of what makes a capable person capable. If a person can't socialize they're not capable and they don't merit anything.

you swing from correct to very incorrect in the span of 2 sentences