Why did Xerxes failed at invading Greek city states?

See
Commonly referred to as Takhte Jamshid as well

Mr Xerxes I'm the council of Athens.

You don't get to bring chariots.

Absolute horseshit. When the Romans conquered most of Britain and the entirety of Gaul, they destroyed ancient shrine sites and told the occupied Gaulic and Celtic peoples they had to become like them. Hence why there are so many Roman style temples in France and England.

Romans were very insistent on pushing their civilization on others and made use of this by expanding settled ex-soldiers and officers in Colonias in newly annexed lands.

Takhte Jamshid is the modern Persian name for Persepolis. Parsa was just the region where the Achaemenid tribe of Iran called their nation. We aren't exactly sure what the native ancient name for Persepolis was.

While that is true, they also adopted various gods from Ilyria, Hispania, Egypt, Gaul sometimes mixing them with Roman deities, sometimes with each others, sometimes legions would straight out adopt them in provinces. As much later, their 'religion' was strategic and political tool.
They would often claim territory, intimidate locals to resettle elsewhere, enslave them or kill them destroying their settlements and building their own on top of those or on satisfying strategic points. Following this procedure, either a legionary camp or a town would be build and always following the same pattern, which includes Roman temples.

After that, Romans would be brought there to settle after being granted land. Farmers, merchants, whores and so on. They would trade and mix with the ex-local population and that would always achieve: 1) Romanization of less advanced locals which would make them want to be like Romans out of necessity, respect, fear or whatever, especially considering the fact that Romans would claim the best land, naturally 2) integrating locals into Roman society primarly through military service, enslavement, producing the next generation of half-Romans etc. 3) Locals giving something back in terms of culture, usually new gods, among other things

>implying Romans pushed the personal beliefs of everyone
>implying paying your respects to the gods went any further than paying your respects to the state through necessary rituals concerning old traditions
>implying that should concern anyone but the high ranking Romans only, certainly not some peasant in Hispania

>Roman style temples
I mean, you literally have the Roman style temples for the most absurd gods in all provinces, its just the style

Man, it must suck of Hollywood to turn you into a gay evil black guy

>implying
Their motto was literally "be like us or we will enslave and wipe you out." That exists even today as "When in Rome, do as the Romans do."

You should elaborate a bit more on this, because Ive presented arguments that are valid and proven. This major oversimplification of romanization that you claim just isn't the truth.

This battle was undoubtedly one of the most metal events of antiquity
>persians thrown into the water and beaten to death with oars, like tuna fish

>Hollywood
read a book please
specifically 300