hahahahah jesus christ >fuck everything down there m8
Actually you need both.
Mobilty means jack shit if your bullets can't penetrate your opponent's armor.
And you still have to make the other guy dead. Bullets are pretty good in places you can't call in an airstrike/artillery barrage/Attack Chopper support/tanks/dronestrikes/shitposting army.
why didn't they adopt this?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YF-23 "The YF-23 was stealthier and faster, but less agile than its competitor. After a four-year development and evaluation process, the YF-22 was announced the winner in 1991 "
a pity, it's beautiful. is it nuclear-capable?
It cannot carry the B61, which is the current tactical nuclear weapon of the US. Neither can the F-22, although the F-35 is capable of carrying it.
well, it's supposed to be fighter anyway
>Jominites keep complaining about bullets being to " weak" when ammo is just meant to pin troops while you maneuver and close. Who?
Also, bullets often are meant to pin the enemy so that artillery can take them out.
Even then, it depends on the war. A total war between two well organized nations is different from an ethnoc conflict is different from and American war where you attack a weak country to create demand for cruise missiles.