oh geez, here we go
What are the best and worst tanks of WWII in each of these categories?
Zachary Reyes
Sebastian Hall
Camel vs Tank
Grayson Stewart
>Japanese
You mean Italian
Japs had some good designs for the task that they were made for (infantry support). You're not going to have any big tank vs tank battles in South East Asian jungle.
Italian tanks on the other hand were useless in all roles and were being made fun of by both the Axis and Allied soldiers.
Jeremiah Price
>Italian tanks on the other hand were useless in all roles and were being made fun of by both the Axis and Allied soldiers.
Daily reminder Rommel was never supposed to leave Europe and the Afrika Korps was never even supposed to fucking exist but they had to intervene because Italy can't do ONE FUCKING THING RIGHT
William Sanders
>Japs had some good designs
Dominic Brown
I met an Afrika Korps member back in the 80's.
He told me that Italian units would ask to borrow German tanks for their individual operations (patrols, etc.)
Matthew Sanchez
Some tanks were totally useless like a super heavy T-35 or Char 2C
Some were shitty like Most tanks were atleast decent or useful is a more proper term. The allied medium tanks T-34/Sherman/Cromwell were all excellent as well as the German Panther and Panzer IV.
Austin Carter
>you will never make a stunning jungle flanking maneuver and surround arrogant british imperialists
just kill me now
Dylan Harris
Your post is pretty good, although technically, a Stug isn't a tank, it's a self propelled gun.
Henry Johnson
camel
>cute
>can eat it in an emergency
>can cut it open and crawl inside it for warmth in an emergency
>icebreaker with ladies
>runs on water
tank
>made of useless inedible metal
>runs on volatile gasoline
>ladies are turned off by an autist in a tank
>has no face and is thus repellent
>will cook you alive if penetrated by gunfire
how can tanks even compete?