For those who actually read these, anyone else notice how they are philosophical polar opposites? Rei (MUNDUS) resumes the Gnostic / Platonist / Apollonian side, favoring integration / perfection, oneness, and knowing, referring to those on his side as the "noble ones" and his opponents (who favor immersion over knowing, which he defines as suppressing self-awareness and consciousness, which stifles the soul) as ignoble. Meanwhile, Icy (Orgy) resumes the Pre-Socratic / Nietzschean / Dionysian side, favoring hierarchy / power, individuality, and immersion (which, following from Nietzsche, is seen as an intoxicating Yes-saying to life, life here understood as the cycle of creation and destruction).
Ignoring the tone / attitude of the writers behind these works, they are really simply continuing two long standing traditions which have always been at odds: the Apollonian which seeks to unite with oneness and move beyond the concepts of life and death and the passage of space-time, and the Dionysian which seeks itself, power for itself, choosing to celebrate the cycle of life and death and sustain it, choosing untruth over truth out of a desire for the intoxicating emotions that it comes with.