Unpopular opinions threads

I'll start.
>WW1 was not anywhere near as bad as people make it out to be
>Roman age Germans were not barbarians and were in fact superior to the Romans
>France and Britain were the primary cause of WW1
>Romans ruined Europe
>Egyptians were Aryans

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4ztOV2wrrkY&nohtml5=False
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_on_the_Inequality_of_the_Human_Races
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustin_Thierry
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Roman age Germans were not barbarians and were in fact superior to the Romans
>Romans ruined Europe

t.Alberto Von Kraut

>I'll have it be known that we were, indeed, pharaohs and the like

>>France and Britain were the primary cause of WW1
I would seriously want to know why. Like, I can agree with the first sentence about WW1 not being as bad. But I just don't see how anyone can spin France and Britain being the primary cause of the war. Unless it's some Olympics tier mental gymnastics in which the existence of France is a 'primary cause' of Germany attacking them and thus the war or something.

Most Germans unironically believe that it was France that declared war on Germany.

>Decolonisation was a mistake

how is it unpopular to believe egyptians were Arians, Arianus lived in egypt

>"german" tribes were a cohesive people with a common culture, language, religion

I find that difficult to believe, in 1918-1950s perhaps, but German WW1 education has for about forty years been... well, not great, but not as bad as that would imply.

The Ottomans and Turks did nothing wrong

Hitler actually did lots of stuff wrong, both morally and strategically.

>>WW1 was not anywhere near as bad as people make it out to be
More people died per hundred in France, Germany and England than in WWII. If World Wars are not bad, nothing ist.
>Egyptians were Aryans
Ah okay, so you are simply retarded. Carry on then.

>>Romans ruined Europe
>>Egyptians were Aryans
>>Roman age Germans were not barbarians and were in fact superior to the Romans
t. Günther Guggenbichler

Egyptians were Indian?
wew lad

The myth of Germans being barbarians is false and only promoted by Jewish media attempting to discredit Aryan innovation and give credit to degenerates such as the Romans.
If Romans were superior then why did they get BTFO at Teutoburg forest and become too afraid to invade further?
People also unironically believe that big, filthy cities and "democracy" that promote degenerate ideals that Romans had were good in anyway, shape or form. Germans lived in small connected tribes and fared far better without these great markers of "civilization".

Germans were only defending themselves against an attack from France. France had been interested in invading Germans again for many years after what they had tried to do a few decades earlier, and lost (surrender monkey butthurt). Obviously, even if it were Germany that was responsible it would have been justifiable in their case.

Many cucks refuse to believe that Egyptians were predominantly blue eyed and blond haired.

Wrong.

WW1 really was not bad at all. The reason liberals are so hellbent on having it portrayed as a literal killing field is because it was a war fought purely for nationalism - every man, fighting for the honor and glory of his respective empire. That's why they hate it so much.

Literally >the eternal kraut the post

It's true and actually most French people believe that too.

t. have lived in both countries

WE

WUZ

KANGZ

>The reason liberals are so hellbent on having it portrayed as a literal killing field is because it was a war fought purely for nationalism
No, the reason is math and the fact that it was the first industrialized war in Germany. Take the UK. In WWII around 350.000 British soldiers died. In a shorter time span and in a war apparently of a much smaller scale (WWI) around 900.000 soldiers died. The experience of this war in deeply engraved all three languages French, German and English to this day.

So tell me compared to what was WWI "not bad at all"? Your Warhammer-scenarios?

>the first industrialized war in Germany
Meant to say Europe. Still, trips don't lie and OP is an idiot.

...

Germanics worshipped the fucking ground prior to the Romans coming in and giving you civilization.

>be Germanic
>be """""""""Ubermensch"""""""""
>lose 2 (TWO) world wars against """""" untermensch"""""""
>men so gay that you are literally going extinct from lack of children
>women so slutty that they love blacks and arabs
>allow millions of Muslims to flood europe, only stop because Eastern Europe saved you from yourself
The true master race

>If Romans were superior then why did they get BTFO at Teutoburg forest and become too afraid to invade further?
>The Germanic Wars is a name given to a series of wars between the Romans and various Germanic tribes between 113 BC and 596 AD
>500 year of more warfare after Teutoburg
>too afraid to invade

Also the most prominent reason amongst historians is a cost/benefit calculation. Germany was/is poor and resources and those resources they have were covered by the German Urwald. It was way easier to trade with those people than to fight them.

I laugh with you James Franco but this shit with the refugees is /pol/-tier propaganda and it's wrong. Also Eastern Europe can't tell Germany jackshit.

>youtube.com/watch?v=4ztOV2wrrkY&nohtml5=False

Mandatory.

>If Romans were superior then why did they get BTFO at Teutoburg forest
The Romans became too comfy with the idea of their supremacy and as one of the progenitors of civilization eventually became tame and timid, as did the rest of Europe, with the advancement of civilization. Germanics didn't know anything but living in caves and worshipping the ground prior to the Romans and therefore they had to fight for their survival harder than the Romans, as the comforts of civilization weren't known to them.

What untermensch did they lose to in WW1? The Jews?

>Gold is a very valuable commodity

Gets me every time.

All non-Germanics, basically, were sub-humans of varying degrees according to Nazi racial hierarchy, that needed to be either exterminated or Germanized depending on how far down the scale they were.

>implying the Jews are not behind both World Wars
It's like you've never seen a /pol/-macro.

Your liberal brainwashed mind is clearly incapable of understanding this. But WW1 was a glorious war, every man that fought and died did so with a smile on their face and the realization that he was dying for the greater good of his empire, thousands signed up in droves knowing full well what would await them. I'm sure they are glad that they do not have to see the state of Europe current day.

Romans never did give my ancestors "civilization" because they could not stand a chance against the Germans and never successfully invaded, Roman did not stand a chance in open field combat against the Germans and had to rely on cowardly guerrilla tactics.

Germany was exceptionally wealthy now and then which is why they were so well off without the influence from degenerate Romans.

*sigh*
yet more Jewish propaganda. The video is completely wrong. Firstly the Holy Roman Empire WAS holy, roman and an empire. Germany did not cause WW1. Jews lost them WW1. And the Holocaust never happened.

true for the biggest part

>All non-Germanics, basically, were sub-humans
Source: your anus

>Nazi Opinions
>Unpopular on Veeky Forums

>Your liberal brainwashed mind is clearly incapable of understanding this. But WW1 was a glorious war, every man that fought and died did so with a smile on their face and the realization that he was dying for the greater good of his empire, thousands signed up in droves knowing full well what would await them. I'm sure they are glad that they do not have to see the state of Europe current day.
How about you answer my question?
>every man that fought and died did so with a smile on their face and the realization that he was dying for the greater good
LOL confirmed for never having read Ernster Jünger. Nazi pleb.

Yeah, those beautiful refugees from a rich culture, man. It's not like they're harboring terrorists, preaching their disgusting religion that goes against everything the West stands for, lobbying for retarded shit and biting the hand that feeds them.

It's just tanned Germans.

>Romans never did give my ancestors "civilization" because they could not stand a chance against the Germans and never successfully invaded
>Firstly the Holy Roman Empire WAS holy, roman and an empire.
hmm

Lel, what were Honorary Aryans for then?

>Germany was exceptionally wealthy now and then which is why they were so well off without the influence from degenerate Romans.
Yes, I bet the Romans were really eager to harvest xenophobia, shitty military planing and lead.

Germans are a cancer that should have been destroyed long ago. No matter how many times they get their shit pushed in, they never learn.

You're shitposting in overdrive now.

You must be fun at parties.

The fuck are you on about you cuckold, since when did they consider the French and the Brits to be subhumans?

>he doesn't even know about the Sängerkrieg 1914
>still buying the Burgfrieden-Narrativ by Guido Knop

...

They did consider Poles, Finns and Russians to be sub-human, for instance. Claiming otherwise is to mock intelligence.

Not a /pol/tard but in both wars France employed Arabs and blacks from the colonies.

What now?

...

>implying they did lose to Poles and Russians in WW2

Are you even following the train of discussion or did you just jump in and reply to the first post you saw?

*WW1

Fuck me

The Germans already considered the French subhuman even before the Nazis.

We were talking about WW1 originally. Germany won this war in the East (smacking Russia, Romania etc.). They lost in the West to countries mostly inhabited by what they later considered Aryans.

>Germans were only defending themselves against an attack from France. France had been interested in invading Germans again for many years after what they had tried to do a few decades earlier, and lost (surrender monkey butthurt). Obviously, even if it were Germany that was responsible it would have been justifiable in their case.
ebin :DD

>Source: myan.us

Never heard the theory that the Egyptians were Persian before.

kek

I don't know what you're trying to say, but literally read anything written about France in imperial Germany. It's all about French people being Gaulish/Latin subhumans ruled by a superior Germanic race.

Highly unlikely since Germans were basically just copying the well advances French racial theories:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Essay_on_the_Inequality_of_the_Human_Races
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augustin_Thierry

>How about you answer my question?
As previously mentioned the true reason that WW1 is portrayed as the "terrible" war is purely due to the context of nationalism, which liberals such as yourself despise. The numbers that died in the war are completely irrelevant. What matters is that they gloriously and with the honour of their nation in their hearts. This is why it is not bad.

>LOL confirmed for never having read Ernster Jünger. Nazi pleb.
I am in fact a big fan of Junger, I have read quite a few quotes by him and he holds very similar opinions to me - opinions that your kind would never understand.

It's always saddening and amusing to see victims of Jewish propaganda such as yourselves. Germany has done far more good for this world than any other European nation combined.

This fukkin video maaaannn

It's like an atomic bomb of trolling deliberately designed to provoke kraut asspain

I like it! :^)

Of course, the whole history of Germany is about copying French things, then turning them into twisted monstrosities and pretending they came up with everything themselves.

>But because they couldn't handle any banter, the serious discussion quickly became a joke

Until this post I didn't know it was possible to have objectively wrong opinions.

Yeah this is the stuff based on Augustin Thierry. The word Untermensch didn't even exist until the 20s (when it was translated into German). It was coined by a hardcore nazi in the late 20s: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg

So of course according to nazist theory French people were inferior to Aryan pure-breeds but they were far from being sub-human/untermensch. Untermenschen were to be exterminated and the Nazis sure as hell didn't try to exterminate the French people.

I despise Liberalism. Now answer the question already: What do you compare WWI to when you say it's "not that bad"?
>The numbers that died in the war are completely irrelevant.
Yeah, except it isn't since every dead man is mourned by his family with or without nationalism.

>I am in fact a big fan of Junger
>I still can't write his name properly
It's Jünger you American redneck fuck. I bet you don't even speak German and if you had read early Jünger you'd know that he writes that people cried on the battlefield when they fell.

>le honor and glory meme

Edgy.

>Germany has done far more good for this world than any other European nation

Endless wars about petty shit and, more recently, letting a bunch of Mudslimes into Europe. That's a great thing, man.

Why is this board so pathetically bad at detecting trolls?

You forgot Atlantis

>implying that the board's population isn't just trolls one-upping each other

Umm an example of how warfare has got worse would be europeans were shocked with the numbers lost in one day during the u.s civil war because of the banked formations & faster loading more accurate rifles

>not knowing who Arianus is

>It's always saddening and amusing to see victims of Jewish propaganda such as yourselves. Germany has done far more good for this world than any other European nation combined.
Girls most throw themselves at you.

>What do you compare WWI to when you say it's "not that bad"?
All wars. It is no worse that any war ever fought. The only difference is that I would consider it better than most wars ever fought due to the nationalism motivation that the soldiers had.

>Yeah, except it isn't since every dead man is mourned by his family with or without nationalism.
All German families knew what the cost was in fighting for one's country, and they would not have felt sadness, but rather felt respect for what their sons and brothers had done.

Actually, I am 1/24th German, therefore I likely have far more knowledge in German that you.

>Jünger
>Unsre Leute haben nun den berühmten Sturm hinter sich, von|meiner Komp. ist fast ⅓ verloren gegangen. Wir führen hier ein seltsames Leben. Heute z. B. kam der Hauptmann vollständig besoff en vor die Wache und schrie um Hilfe. Als die Wache rauskam und nicht wußte, was tun, verurteilte er sie zu drei Tagen Loch. Dann fi el ihm ein, Feueralarm zu gebieten. Alles lief auf den Alarmplatz und wurde|furchtbar angeranzt mit Arschloch und andern Ehrentiteln. Der Wachthabende und ein Sanitätsuntoff z. wurden zu 3 Tagen Loch verurteilt und mußten sofort abgeführt werden. Fortwährend mußte mit einer alten Spritze gegen eine Mauer gespritzt werden und ein Wasserträger wurde verdächtigt, gepißt zu haben.|Die Offi ziere,
ie eben noch mit ihm gesoff en hatten, kamen einfach nicht, was furchtbaren Krawall setzte. Dann hielt der Hauptmann eine donnernde Rede über die Schlechtigkeit der Bevölkerung und teilte uns mit, daß er die Bevölkerung zu 300 M verurteilen wolle. Außerdem ist öfters allgemeine große Besäufnis, wo jede Abteilung| für sich ein Faß aussäuft. Dann ist das ganze Nest blau.

Yeah. German Übermenschen being glorious.

>All wars. It is no worse that any war ever fought. The only difference is that I would consider it better than most wars ever fought due to the nationalism motivation that the soldiers had.
It is though and I told you why.>Actually, I am 1/24th German, therefore I likely have far more knowledge in German that you.
Japp, aber ich bin 100% deutsch du ungebildeter amerikanischer jungfräulicher Versager. Außerdem nehme ich jetzt einfach an, dass du zugibst kein deutsch zu sprechen und deine Meinungen über deutsche Geschichte daher auf Wiki und History Channel und nicht auf Quellen beruhen.

>I am 1/24th German
10/10

300 M?

Try to argue with this guy. He will answer you for days. If he is a troll ( I just think he's stupid) he is a dedicated one. But yeah people should just BTFO him in one post and move on.

Veeky Forums is truly full of normies and redditors if they're getting baited by this shit

300 Millionen Reichsmark I assume.

The 1/24th part was way too obvious, he is probably going to delete the post.

Never mind then. I heard American seriously stating shit like this tho.

Thanks for reminding Veeky Forums what an truly artistic troll looks like

tbqh family the Bible stands for and orders people to do a lot of the same bullshit (sans taking yourself with them). We've just been able to pacify Christians and gotten them to reinterpret parts of their book as figurative so they could go back to the strip club or do whatever the equivalent was in the 1600's. We did it with memes and reality television and by teaching everyone to read. Other than the obvious year difference the infighting shit muslims are doing now is similar to something like the Protestant v Catholic was in the time of Luther.

tl;dr give them a gameboy and show them pornography and they'll start to reinterpret their views.

np

>Spot the Kraut

Fuck that shit, send the fuckers back to turkey. Refugees should be made to feel most unwelcome in europe, as they had to go past multiple nations that have no war to get there in the first place.

Fuck these asylum shopping shitbags.

/pol/ plz go

more like stupidly broad statements
>>WW1 was not anywhere near as bad as people make it out to be
The most gruesome battles of WWI were unprecendetend in scale and carnage, and havn't been repeated on the same scale (thank god). Most wars only have a few awful meatgrinders, WWI has several, The Somme. Ypres. Verdun. Marne. Isonzo. etc. Did ever soldier in uniform see those battles? no. But that does nothing to make those battlefields less hellish.
>Roman age Germans were not barbarians and were in fact superior to the Romans
in what ways? They were pretty shitty in the whole recording things for posterity and inspiring later civilizations to greatness categories.
>Romans ruined Europe
Building cities and infrastucture = ruins now.
>France and Britain were the primary cause of WW1
>Egyptians were Aryans
>>

>Actually, I am 1/24th German
lol

>I am 1/24th German

>tfw I can read most of that.
I should get back to duolingo.

>people who refer to germans as aryan are stupid
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aryan
That doesn't mean we germanics aren't great

>being factual wrong is just opinion

>Many cucks refuse to believe that Egyptians were predominantly blue eyed and blond haired.
Now I know this thread was bait. Not even /pol/ takes this """"""""""""""""""""""""""theory""""""""""""""""""""""""""seriously