Thoughts?

Too old.

I want to put my penis in her asshole.

I wanna fingerblast ha' fanny.

...

I think my favorite midnight snack just became Beans Anne Frank!

who specifically are you talking about?

Well for me it kinda bothers me that her father tried to make a martyr of her while removing human aspects of Anne like how she was a horny fuck who wanted to do mutual masturbating with her cousin and wanted to fuck that Peter boy.

I mean I suppose I understand a father not wanting their dead daughter's sex secrets exposed but then again he didn't have to publish her diary in the first place.

>Thoughts?

IIIIIIIIII LOOOOOOOOVEEE YOUUUUUUU JESSSSSUUUUUSSS CHRIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIST

This requires a link, mate:
youtube.com/watch?v=Wabrnt1MVVQ

She's kinda cute

waifu

...

I've never heard of 'Who Owns Anne Frank?'

What is it?

It's an critical essay about the distortion, romanticization and general misuse of The Diary of Anne Frank.

representingtheholocaust.wikispaces.com/file/view/Ozick_Who Owns Anne Frank?.pdf

>like how she was a horny fuck who wanted to do mutual masturbating with her cousin and wanted to fuck that Peter boy

>tfw no qt 3.14 anne frank looking gf

I think she would be a belieber too.

don't you think the publication of her diary was valuabe for the society?

That girl is actually cute, Frank is just a jew tool

...

>liking underage girls
>calling others /pol/ as an insult
Tips

Don't think she is though. Vaporwave musician or something

>vaporwave
ruined desu

Pretty hot. Would make out in her house.

she deserved to live

>vaporwave musician
>vaporwave
>music
Is not bad but is not music

what was her crime?

being jewish

>implying

youtube.com/watch?v=J7O26NYXGYM

you do sound a bit antisemitic

Toppest of Keks

Cute! CUTE!

Sure it's useful, but thanks to her father blacking out truth people have turned Anne Frank into a Jew saint rather than a regular girl going through an atrocity. Again while I'm sure it wasn't some ploy to make more money by her father, it still bothers me whenever the full truth is concealed.

It was her female cousin too.

What was left out from the book?

sorry, i dont really see how publishing her sex fantasies would have made any difference

>detailed almost health-tier description of different parts of her vagina
>description of going through puberty, periods, ect
>getting a 'tingly' sensation to nude statues
>masturbating
>trying to convince her female cousin to do mutual masturbation and fondle breasts
>romance shit with Peter

It's the fact of them being covered up that's the matter. Though considering what a shitstorm American mothers give about the unabridged version, I conceal that maybe it was for the best so public schools can freely talk about the more important aspects of the primary source.

>removing underage sex fantasies
>jew saint

>description of going through puberty, periods, ect
I feel like that at least should have been left in. Helps drive home the point that she was a normal girl in a very abnormal situation.

I agree. It helps add empathy toward the character that is lacking if you just take out all the naughty bits and end up with a bland, stoic victim model.