History of Sex and Relationships

Unless they were destitute beggars, they didn't have to deal with it.

Close your eyes and think of England

DELETE THIS
t. mestizo maligno

Men in the past:
>could buy land for cheap
>get a job anywhere, immediately
>use any drug they want
>could just wander around the country, sleeping in the wilderness and lighting campfires, hunting and fishing to provide
>women were easily available and were second class citizens and if you married one, their dad would give you cash/gold
>had more freedom to start a business

Considering all of that, the average man didn't need to worry about tfw no gf, they had total freedom.

>could just wander around the country, sleeping in the wilderness and lighting campfires, hunting and fishing to provide

I think I just came.

There is so much wrong with this I dont know where to start

Fuck off revisionist. I know what you people are trying to do. You seek to paint modern times with a progressive brush, claiming that modern times are the best times that humans have ever seen.

In Imperial China, Feudal Japan, and Old Indian Rajs they had matchmakers and your whole family/clan.

I'm sorry, it is clan responsibility in those societies to ensure you have a GF.

>tfw no gf is a recent phenomenon, one that could only exist in a society where people form relationships and families purely to fulfill emotional desires and not out of any kind of necessity, pressure from other family members excluded.
I don't really have much info about it but in Don Quixote there's a lot of mentions of tfw no gf in the intercalated novels. So we can say, at least, that there's a precedent.

>tfw no gf
Its not. Italian Medieval Poets love that sort of shit.

start with the buy land for cheap bit

maybe employment and freedom after that

Don't forget petratch, some of the most famous poems/writing of history stem from men being head over heels with women who hardly know they exist.

Prostitutes aren't sex slaves, that's tiresome feminist propaganda.

John Donne also wrote a little about tfw no gf even though he spent the overwhelming majority of his career writing about tfw gf.

This is less tfw no gf and more like tfw no particular girl as gf/waifuism.

>yfw in 500 years /r9k/ will be a treasured cultural relic of 21st century culture.

Arranged marriages
Courtesans
Prostitutes
Military service for raping and pillaging

And women were just generally more willing to settle with a man because they were economically dependant on men.

What if YOU were ugly?

Well that's her problem then.

If you don't excel in everything else and aren't fit/loving then she'd cheat on you, atleast if it was in yurop, I don't know if middle easterners were promiscuous on the women side in the middle ages.

So men have never loved and cared for women and have just raped and abused them throughout history?
Or you people are so disgusting you would rape, abuse and disrespect the woman that were so stupid to give you her consideration?

The ones who comment don't care,and that ones who care don't comment.

I don't think so. The works we treasure are a celebration of joy and devotion toward women even in the face of unrequited love. R9k is a cesspool of hatred and resentment because men think they're entitled to women even though they're repulsive undesirables.

I'm sure some rape was common, but the Spaniards unlike the British actually married into the local populations (or at least made official concubines, the term changes from country to country too, like Barragana)

see

Prostitutes who are forced by a group or an individual to have sex for money they often don't get or get only a minimal fraction of are indeed sex slaves. Human trafficking is as big as ever.

So you people don't want a gf. A gf is a woman you treasure and love. You're just abusive assholes looking for victims.

r9k are abusive assholes looking for victims

>>Human trafficking
Yeah no, this is what I mean by feminist propaganda. Most of the people who make these claims have no reliable sources for their numbers, combine that with the relatively small number of people who are prosecuted for trafficking(in new york city for example, a major port that has relatively few arrests and fewer convictions for the crime in question) and what you have is an issue that is being ridiculously exaggerated by various activist groups.

lol

Right back at you faggot.

Those repulsive undesirables wouldn't be so repulsive if they didn't have to worry about the police busting them for hiring a prostitute.

propaganda

What propaganda? You mean the BS about human trafficking being as big as ever? Yeah that is propaganda, really tedious propaganda too.

yeah because there are no arrests in new york city!

i sincerely wish i was that dumb

I didn't say no arrests, I said few arrests. And yes, there probably are greater amounts of women forced into prostitution in the third world. But most of the women who whore themselves out in the industrialized world aren't forced into it by anything more then poor economic conditions, and there are no small number who do so simply because they prefer that kind of work to other kinds.

prostitution is a comfy job for women, this is why they do not dislike much. they do not like it much too, only when they are not luxury whores doing it in dilettante, the dream job of any woman : choosing to be highly paid to be entertained and fucked by a few selected clients that try to make you cum.

By buying a wife.

>damage control set to 110%

it's not like they could ride the cock carousel around town one night and ride it in another town halfway across the country the following night.

by conquering western civilization

Write children's short stories to wash out the trauma

>raped

You mean that indias loved iberian cock because indios are all manlets with asian sized dicks.

>I don't know if middle easterners were promiscuous on the women side in the middle ages.

Everyone is promiscuous everywhere. That's why you close women in a special place of the house where only you and other women can enter. And you cover them like ninjas when they're outside.

>she'd cheat on you
That wasn't a very good idea since unfaithfulness could literally cost you your head if you were a woman.

True but if you were a Spaniard with indians working on your encomienda many raped their workers. Theres even some letters of complaints by some of the victims. This practice still occurs in some parts of rural Mexico today.

yes they would. inferior people are inferior by nature, not by circumstance.

being able to pay for sex isn't going to magically turn a pathetic neckbeard into a well cultured, bold, and generally noble person.

It's going to make him a pathetic neckbeard with an expensive means of masturbating.

They went to war, then either abducted a woman lr got killed.

>could buy land for cheap
When? Where?
>get a job anywhere, immediately
Crummy jobs, sure. And then only up to the beginnings of automation.
>could just wander around the country, sleeping in the wilderness and lighting campfires, hunting and fishing to provide
Get the evil-eye from everyone, everywhere because you are a stranger. Get eaten by wildlife. Get executed for poaching.
>use any drug they want
Dependent on religious laws.
>women were easily available and were second class citizens and if you married one, their dad would give you cash/gold
Women in the west were mostly taken as assets, not burdens like in the east. You were more like to pay a bride price than to receive a dowry, for most of western history. Women were likely to die by childbirth - this was only offset by men's high death rates on account of violence.
>had more freedom to start a business
If you weren't born into serfdom or downright slavery, you were still most likely set to carry on your pa's business because you'd have lilttle to no starting capital and the know-how was out of your reach.

>>yes they would. inferior people are inferior by nature, not by circumstance.
So it's not the average robot's fault they are so pathetic then? Kinda makes abusing and heaping insults upon them kinda fruitless and mean doesn't it?

>>being able to pay for sex isn't going to magically turn a pathetic neckbeard into a well cultured, bold, and generally noble person.
There is a middle ground between that and repulsive.

Furthermore, plenty of men who aren't all that cultured, bold or noble get sex with attractive women because they know how to talk to girls.

>>It's going to make him a pathetic neckbeard with an expensive means of masturbating.
Thing is, he'll also be happier and less likely to treat other people like shit due to his own unhappiness.

>oh shit oh fuck sorry I didn't mean to do that fuck fuck fuck fuck

Some people probably just focused it into other things. Supposedly Newton died a virgin, i assume he was so into his work he really didnt give a fuck. I guess it paid off

Without porn, men poured their energy into their work or inventing new ideas. Now all their time is occupied. The genie can't be put back into the bottle.

I've heard that Queen Victoria was a sex addict and would abscond to the royal bedchamber (which was allegedly sound proof because she was a loud screamer) with Prince-Consort Albert several times a day. I've also read that Albert was supposedly very well endowed and that he is the origin of the "Prince Albert Piercing."

Anyone know if this stuff is true? I need to know for...

... Research purposes.

I'm guessing there must be at least a kernel of truth in this because Vicky and Albert had a ton of kids.

>kinda fruitless and mean
People abuse the weak and pitiful because it's fun and because it establishes dominance. Nobody cares if you actually deserve it. Welcome to the real world.

You SAY this, having not lived in pre-modern society nor having raped a peasant lass in said times

nonsense Vicky was pure

>referring to men as "they"
C A L C U T T A

>getting land without a cartload of gold or impressive military service
>poaching off land was risk free
>implying guilds and lords didn't make you jump through literal hoops to start a legitimate business

this
those men all had GFs, but they truly loved someone else

>their
>their
>their

Better that than have sex with a repulsive piece of shit like most male Veeky Forums posters.

He and you do not have the right to make a woman unhappy forcing her to be with you because you don't want to be a better person. You don't care about her feelings at all. You're making another person miserable with your existence, you selfish waste of space.

>he'll also be happier
At the expense of someone else's happiness. You're literally an emotional leech. She and everyone else would be completely justified in treating you like shit and killing you for this.

what's up, whore?

>How did men deal with tfw no gf in the past?

Most people didn't leave their village and just married their cousin at 12. There was less sexy time but more of a chance of getting gf.

> less sexy time

European peasants bred like hird-worlders

>Better that than have sex with a repulsive piece of shit like most Veeky Forums posters.*
FIFY
And Veeky Forums is a sausage fest anyway. One can only wonder how hideous a /woman/ would have to be to gravitate to this place.

Veeky Forums is full of the dregs of society and undesirable neckbeards with a chip on their shoulder

>could buy land for cheap
You lost me here

Check out /cgl/ mostly chicks there, catty bitchy miserable cunts, but mostly women.

In terms of quality of life, they are.

kek the inside of a r9k mind

>>this post
>>all that assrage simply because I think a neckbeard being able to pay a whore for sex would help him be a bit less miserable and also make him be a bit less miserable to other people.

You might want to actually read posts you reply to instead of getting all high on the tumblrite righteous indignation.

>>real world
I dunno how miserable your life is that this sort of abuse being heaped on people is how you think the real world works.

Browse that place once, realized it was a nutjob farm and left. Nice try.

whoops

>Browse that place once, realized it was a nutjob farm and left. Nice try.

this was meant for

this is my dream, user ;_;.

Also [spoiler]i want to be the pirate king[/spoiler]

sounds reasonable.

t. landwhale

dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2106204/Victorias-secret-According-tantalising-new-evidence-Queen-Victoria-married-Scottish-groom-bore-secret-daughter-spirited-America.html

Marriages in the past were arranged by parents/families and by status.
Also there used to be a very big age gap between the average husband and wife

>you people
I didnt exist 500 years ago

No poaching laws in the America bruhs.

Even after colonization, they would literally give you land for free so you could go and farm it and secure it for America.

America = best continents

You know Reddit exists, right? Go there.

Pimps didn't exist much, at least in Europe 200 years ago. Prostitutes were just women making some extra ca$h money before middle class morals went into full swing around the latter half of the 19th century.

>just married their cousin

Cousin fucking just recently went out of style and is still very much in vogue in the third world.

Prostitute were abundant, affordable, and visiting them was socially acceptable. Or they could married to a virgin and live happily ever after with sex on demand.

Previous generations could easily satisfy all of their sexual needs, unlike our current one.

Tfwnogf and fuck everyone who says we live in a progressive time.