What events caused most of South America to have dictators in the 1900s? Was it class warfare?, was it corruption?...

What events caused most of South America to have dictators in the 1900s? Was it class warfare?, was it corruption?, was it reactionism?

They wanted to go on a fun helicopter ride :^)

>What events caused most of South America to have dictators in the 1900s? Was it class warfare?, was it corruption?, was it reactionism?

It was the United States.

Dialectic necessicity

Ameriklaps put them all in

it kind of pisses me off how the US support or ignored the atrocities in South America because they wanted to save face.

>Military Junta is better than socialism

Class warfare mostly.

The same problem Latin America has always had.

It stems from the Spanish social structure and plantation agriculture.

It is though.

Considering how Cuba turned out, it was safe to assume that socialist policies dont quite work out.

>Military junta provides 3000 commies with free helicopter tours
>socialist dictatorship causes millions to starve

Hop in bootlicker

>Cuba goes communist in 1959
>Southern Cone countries adopt military rule in the mid 70s
>Southern Cone military juntas are all ousted by the 90s
>Cuba is still communist

Better an end with horror than a horror without end.

US corporations wanted monopolies

Yeah higher literacy and life expectancy must be terrible

Yes, let's ignore what the couple million Cuban diaspora who actually lived in Cuba have to say about it.

darker green is better, Cuba is lower on the development index than the former junta nations.
>muh embargoes

>The United States is a failed state, just ask all the British loyalists in Canada!

>Argentina and Chile were the test cases for US backed dictatorships
>Peru and Colombia were the most democratic states in the region

I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but all I'm getting is that you're gay.

Left wing terrorism.

Murrikuh funded most of them to prevent communism from spreading in Latam.

I figured as much

What, going to protect the USSR as the dindus here? They were dictator-crazed for the opposite reason.

at least it was obvious that the USSR was evil, the US and NATO put on the "good guy" face while funding tyrants

So did the USSR. They pretended to be striving for world peace while having the largest nuclear arsenal on Earth and funding terrorist groups left and right.

You didn't have British loyalists pouring into the U.S. some 40 years after the war ended like the 30,000 some odd Cubans that manage to leave Cuba a year.

Great false equivalence though.