>shirt tucked into trousers
>no belt
is this the best way to stay ahead of the curve without going full avant garde?
Shirt tucked into trousers
Asher Johnson
Landon Reed
i don't know if it will keep you ahead of the curve but it looks good. remember to wear high rise pants.
Ian Cooper
yes, but good luck finding pants that will fit
they just dont make them like that anymore
Justin Diaz
>they just dont make them like that anymore
look harder
Dominic Walker
everything uniqlo sells right now looks like they just watched the movie and went all in on it
Carter Sanders
That's certainly not true for their pants.
Jaxon Rivera
Works as long as there are no belt loops.
Look at some trousers with side cinches.
businessoffashion.com
Luke Ortiz
not wearing a belt is probably more avant garde since the conventional fashion rule is to wear a belt
Jacob Robinson
I'm not convinced there exists well fitted high pants that can be worn without a belt.
> everything uniqlo sells right now looks like
> looks like
Elijah Cook
look for companies that do reproductions of period clothing, that's what joaquin is wearing.
Matthew Perez
it's no so avant garde that most people will even really be able to put their finger on what's different though that's all I really care for
Isaac Cooper
>they just dont make them like that anymore
True, why are 99% of pants low rise garbage? Lmao when guys will look at trousers with a slim leg and say BUT HOW DO UR BALLS HAVE ROOM while they are wearing low rise pants with no ball/ass/thigh room and yards of room in the calves.
Disgusting. Low/mid rise should be only for women only.
Landon Torres
lol what? there are tons of companies making high rises
levis 501
Christopher Miller
> be in the hollywood movie industry and have access to people who do period piece custom clothing so they can REMAKE WHAT THEY NO LONGER MAKE
thanks, lad
will check it out
William Robinson
they're objectively shit though
Xavier Reyes
>objectively
I don't think you know what that means
Christian Green
there's like a million stores that make their living off this shit it's not that hard to find
Jayden Lewis
I have a pant that fit good enough to wear it without a belt. So, yeah, you can find high pants that don't need belts.
I've seen so many girls use it without belt and in my opinion it looks better.
But, I don't think that is a good look to a man. A normal jeans pants looks better for me.
Christopher Morgan
kek
David Taylor
DUDE ITS EVERYWHERE
nice
Jaxson Price
>you can find high pants that don't need belts.
You can't find good high pants period.
They are. Unless you're talking about muh vintage denim than yes, expect every pair of Levis to be shit.
Evan Gonzalez
That's not a fashion rule. No belt just shows that you've got the correct size of pants thus illustrating how conscious you are about your measurements.
Justin Howard
guys you know normal people don't wear low rise pants right? you might have to go to forbidden lands like Jos A Bank or Brooks Brothers or something, but it really isn't that hard to find normal-people pants. Think like a normie and you will look like a normie
Ryan Perez
ever heard of google? you should try it sometime
Grayson Jones
>You can't find good high pants period.
uh no
Brandon Rodriguez
but I buy all my clothes at sears and zumiez. They don't have it therefore it can't possibly exist.
Hunter Hall
'no'
Landon Hill
i was always told its wrong to tuck your shit in without a belt so i just assumed this was a fashion standard
Jackson Ross
me on the right
Nathaniel Brown
what is thsi
Ryan Perry
>reproductions of period clothing
what period? civil war? 20s?
Cameron James
example?
Kayden Richardson
vulture.com
>The tapered-leg, high-waisted pants that Phoenix’s Theodore wears are based on a mid-1800s pair that Storm found in a costume shop
Carson Howard
>based on
Angel Myers
Bump
Austin Cox
i want his collarless shirt