Why are we not allowed to discuss ancient historical writings regarding ancient myths related to the Flood on this history board which allows discussion related to religion as made obvious by this ?
Are the fascist mods insecure atheists or something?
I'll ask again, what do ancient writings say about the Flood?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Explain lads.
I'm really curious.
There was some flood in Mesopotamia and the Eastern Mediterranean sometime in the Paleolithic-Mesolithic-Neolithic.
/thread
>Oldest trea older than the flood
Ooooops
>[..]ithic
Evolutionist detected.
For those who claim air got thinner after the flood.
Daily reminder that pre historic sea level rise is scientifically established
Great flood myths all around the world reflect this event
More like young tree that survived the flood due to its youth or dating off by hundreds of years.
Why is there only 1 tree that old? Checkmate. (not even being ironic)
What, of course. Like all proper Christians I am an evolutionist. Only Muslims and others are anti-evolution.
All human settlements along the coast were submerged forever.
Pretty apocalyptic event, right?
Mahometan detected
Poor bait.
Christians and evolutionism are mutually exclusive.
>Christians
Catholic spotted.
Nah I don't think so pal.
Demonic Mohammedian subversive. Take your filthy Arab lies off our Christian board.
Reminder that archeological findings support what's in the Holy Bible.
Why is there only three threes even so slightly close to as being as old as the flood?
Maybe they are just at the extreme upper limit of how old trees can become?
>Surviving the flood
The water level rose with more than 9 km and lasted for four years, hard to see how that is gonna happen-
Kek well memed my Mahometan friend. Go discuss your Quaranic sillyness elsewhere.
And Science do accept those events, as in form of ice ages.
What are you trying to say?
Young tree, buddy.
Nu-male atheists on suicide watch.
whats going on here
Human settlements around the coasts suberging is a bit different than a flood covering the whole earth.
and it predates the time given in the bible by thousands of years.
Young trees do not survive floods very well. There are older trees in the form of root systems that have survived for thousand of years and produce new trunks every so often
A bunch of Muslims are trying to shove the Quaran down our throats.
Lucy is the most complete so-called "missing link".
The leg bones for Lucy were found a mile and a half away from the head bones.
The leg bones were two hundred feet deeper and in a different layer of strata.
They were not all found in the same layer of strata or even in the same location; they were scattered over a mile and a half.
Explain.
All those so-called "missing links" have all turned out to be either fully human, fully animal or fake. Just because some animals have some similar features doesn't necessarily mean a "common ancestor", it may mean a common designer.
...
That a great flood is established history and legend reflect
However the bible stories having "god" submerge the whole world, then letting the water retreat is nothing more than an poetic memory of a natural event changing the live of all humans alive at that time.
Nu-male atheists getting triggered and BTFO.
>b-b-b-b-b-but no I'm just an intelligent shaved ape!
Your understanding of a "missing link" is about a hundred years behind modern biology.
They dont just have common features, many used tools, had the same social structure as primitive humans, and had virtually the same DNA with only minor differences
>The leg bones were two hundred feet deeper and in a different layer of strata.
Source?
The cultural memories of seeing all the places they knew get flooded gradually became the myth of a worldwide flood after generations of retelling
in other words the bible was right.
>protestants
>Christian
lmao
In Africa, Australia and the Andaman Islands.
>Human settlements around the coasts suberging is a bit different than a flood covering the whole earth.
It's not for you, subjectively if you lived in one of these settlements (and most humans lived near the coast at all times)
>it predates the time given in the bible by thousands of years.
which is why the bible is wrong on that detail, like many others
They are Occidental Muslims.
Just as Muslims are Oriental Protestants.
holy shit I didn't know there was water under the Earth
Fundamentalists are not comprehending science. Same as usual
in the same sense that the bible was right that there were romans