What's your favorite religion? Why?

>"I don't shitpost religion everywhere."
>You, literally less than 24 hours ago

A tie between Greco-Roman Polytheism and Germanic Polytheism.

That was in response to you claiming that I am "christposting in non-religious threads".

This thread which I created is a religious one.

So I'm here.

Pastafarianism

...

Ancient Egyptian religion
Praise Kek

Zoroastrianism

I was raised as a Catholic and was always fascinated by religious myths. Greek myths and the like. When I took my first true history class in college, I was blown away to discover Zoroastrianism. I won't get into the importance of it because this is a place I don't have to. Very cool.

I found their connception of "hell" as a nasty place interesting too. Maggots, shit, vomit, piss, rotting flesh, etc... Definitely a different take than what I had envisioned. Towers of Silence are a great idea as well.

It's kind of sad it's hardly practiced now. It's such an ancient and developed religion.

Buddhism. Chill as fuck.

Islam.

Because it is the true faith brought down by Allah to Adam (Saw) and his descendants.

Muhammad was actually visited by a false angel of light, it was a demon, a fallen angel of deception. Satan and his workers are great mimickers and Muhammad, deceived, established a demonic cult of Allah (false-God) called Islam (meaning voluntary submission to this false-God, i.e. Satan) which he spread like wildfire by the sword convinced that it was the last revelation of God Almighty.

Islam is none other than Satan's magnum opus, which now has 1.6 billion adherents (23% of the world population) and which will probably be followed by half of the world population by 2050.

>For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.
2 Corinthians 11:13-15

Muhammad was a gluttonous wealthy slave owner, an adulterer, a child-molesting pedophile, a murderer, a liar, he encouraged theft, rape, torture and the list goes on. He was the pawn of Satan and is now in Hell.

>Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Thus you will recognize them by their fruits.
Matthew 7:15-20

Zoroastrianism because it pisses off abrahamitard kikes, christcucks and mudslimes so much to know that their religions are basically spin-offs from Zoroastrianism.

It's a tie between Norse religion and Hinduism. Tales of the end times and cycle of life in Ragnarok and Kali Yuga fascinate and intrigue me.

>this is what nu-male hipsters actually believe

and most scholars

Do you automatically post whenever the word Islam comes up or were you lurking on this thread?

>

Early syncretic Christianity had some pretty dank heresies. Would practice.

What's wrong, Abd Al-Makr? Can't handle facts?

>But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.
Galatians 1:8-9

Facts are verifiable. Passages from the Bible are not.

Fulfilled biblical prophecies are. Try again, nu-male.

>posting my boy Francis E. Dec Esquire without any of his long ass rants
Disgusting, kurdfag.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manichaeism

Praise Mani

He's from /x/, give him some slack. I suspect this guy has been posting here literally all day

I don't think he's from /x/.

I am.

>being from /x/
>trying to propagate the stereotype that Christians should take theology to some other board
Nigga.

What about failed prophecies?
>For the Son of Man is going to come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and will then repay every man according to his deeds. Truly I say to you, there are some of those who are standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in His kingdom. (Matthew 16: 27, 28)
Ouch.

Luke 9:27 says, "I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God." See also Matthew 16:28 and Mark 9:1 for the parallel quotes. In each of the synoptic Gospels, the next event immediately after this promise from Jesus is the transfiguration. Rather than interpreting Jesus' promise as referring to His coming to establish His kingdom on earth, the context indicates that Jesus was referring to the transfiguration. The Greek word translated “kingdom” can also be translated “royal splendor,” meaning that the three disciples standing there would see Christ as He really is—the King of heaven—which occurred in the transfiguration.

The “transfiguration” refers to the event described in the above cited passages when Jesus took Peter, James, and John to the top of the mountain, where He met with Moses and Elijah—representing the Law and the Prophets of the Old Testament—and spoke with them. The disciples saw Jesus in all His glory and splendor, talking with a glorified Moses and Elijah. This is a glimpse of what will occur in Jesus' kingdom. The disciples were dumbstruck at the sight and “fell on their faces” (Matthew 17:6).

It seems most natural to interpret this promise in Matthew 16:28; Mark 9:1; and Luke 9:27 as a reference to the transfiguration, which "some" of the disciples would witness only six days later, exactly as Jesus predicted. In each Gospel, the very next passage after this promise from Jesus is the transfiguration, which shows Jesus in all His glory which will be seen again in the Kingdom of God. The contextual links make it very likely that this is the proper interpretation.

It's also possible that Jesus meant it more literally, and there are actually people alive today who witnessed him say those words.

I mean this is religion. Why can't it be a little supernatural and spooky?

>Why can't it be a little supernatural and spooky?
Got angels and demons and other spooky shit for that.

You're going to run Christianity straight into the ground here. If you care even a little about how you perceive your religion, you'll turn your computer off and never talk about Christianity again
Shit, I feel bad for the rest of them. Not even that abominable faggot Constantine deserves you

*people perceive your religion
need more coffee dammit

Struck a nerve?

What's so bad about someone who posts shit on the dime?
I miss WOLFSHIEM, I wish he'd come back, fuck Constantine he's a bitch.

Muh rationalizations.

You feel for the Joseph Smith of the Roman Era

NEW MEME IS EWE MEME

Kill yourself, btw

By the power of the Holy Spirit He was born of the Virgin Mary, and became man. For our sake He was crucified under Pontius Pilate, He suffered, died and was buried. On the third day He rose again in fulfillment of the Scriptures. He ascended into heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father. He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead and His kingdom will have no end.

He preached for 3 years.

He was eventually betrayed and denied by His own disciples, then later mocked and killed.

In less than 30 years after His death and resurrection His Gospel was preached as far as India.

And as He prophesied, 40 years after His death and resurrection, the siege of Jerusalem occurred, the city was annihilated and the Second Temple was completely destroyed along with nearly a million jews being slaughtered.

This is true. All of it.

He wasn't just a "preaching carpenter" and you know it.

As for Joseph Smith, he was a conman whose deceitful works have been thoroughly debunked.

cesletter.com/Letter-to-a-CES-Director.pdf

>But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.
Galatians 1:8-9

Christianity because of its literature and metaphysics, and Mahayana Buddhism because of its aesthetic and variety.

It's already happening. Mods are deleting some Christian threads because they're starting to associate them with you
It must be an ego thing with you. Someone who really cared would have packed it up and left proselytizing to someone less stupid

I'm here to stay.

for god's sake those images are so fucking annoying. put on a fucking trip!

No. Why? Because it's not an "ego thing".

Christianity has been thoroughly debunked.

>said the cuck

Antichrists think so, yet archeology and prophecies keep proving the Holy Bible right.

>All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.
2 Timothy 3:16-17

If your answer is anything other than the religion you were raised in, I don't like you.

What is that Central European country? Czech Republic? What are they there if not Christian?

>archeology
There were never Jewish slaves in Egypt
There was never an Exodus
There was never a Davidic kingdom of the size described in the bible
Early Hebrews were polytheists
There was never a town called Nazareth in Judea, the name being a misreading of Isaiah by the Gospel writers
Archeology proves you wrong. As for the prophecies, the failed prophecy quoted above should suffice.

>Early Hebrews were polytheists
And references to their various gods and demons abound in the Bible.

>all those stale memes
>failed prophecy
See

>Baits people into saying the word 'Islam' or 'Muhammed'
>AHA NOW IT'S AN ARGUMENT ABOUT RELIGION
>Look God, I posted it again.txt

>Facts
>Quotes a bible passage
wew haha

>Goes on about fulfilled prophecies
>Calls antagonists a nu-male
You like this word, don't you, christian-kun. It's a very demeaning thing to say to someone, it implies that they're not standing up for what they believe in.

Which is a shame, because you're not standing up for your lord and saviour jimbo chrimbo actually being an Arab from a Jewish society himself.
>:^)

Thelema

There is no need to be upset, Abd Al-Makr.

You can simply reject Satan and accept God.

>memes
Except they're fact and you're the one spouting memes. I'm just responding for the sake of other people who might be reading this.

>Ignoring the argument again

why do you pretend to engage in debate if you don't actually do it?

is it because we're all satanists and there's no way that you can be wrong? Is this what you believe?

Are you denying the fact that there were no slaves of Hebrew ethnicity in Egypt?

Muhammad was a gluttonous wealthy slave owner, an adulterer, a child-molesting pedophile, a murderer, a liar, he encouraged theft, rape, torture and the list goes on.

Why do you follow his teachings?

wikiislam.net/wiki/The_Origins_of_the_Quran
wikiislam.net/wiki/Corruption_of_the_Quran
wikiislam.net/wiki/Allah_the_Best_Deceiver
wikiislam.net/wiki/Cosmology_of_the_Quran
wikiislam.net/wiki/Geocentrism_and_the_Quran
wikiislam.net/wiki/Flat_Earth_and_the_Quran
wikiislam.net/wiki/Science_and_the_Seven_Earths
wikiislam.net/wiki/Quranic_Claim_of_Everything_Created_in_Pairs
wikiislam.net/wiki/List_of_Killings_Ordered_or_Supported_by_Muhammad
wikiislam.net/wiki/Rape_in_Islam
wikiislam.net/wiki/72_Virgins

Mods, ban this faggot. he is a cancer to this board. he shits on every fucking religion thread

The Ipuwer Papyrus is an ancient document that provides a possible independent record of the ten plagues in Egypt. It describes a great disaster that took place in ancient Egypt. The oldest copy dates to around 1400 BC, placing it close to the time of the Exodus (circa 1446 BC). The Ipuwer Papyrus is the sole surviving manuscript of an ancient Egyptian poem officially designated as Papyrus Leiden I-344. The poem is known as “The Admonitions of Ipuwer.” A new edition is available now entitled “The Dialogue of Ipuwer and the Lord of All.” Dutchman Giovanni Anastasi purchased the Ipuwer Papyrus in 1828, and it is now housed in Leiden, the Netherlands, at the Dutch National Museum of Antiquities, the Rijksmuseum van Oudheden.

We shall now compare the Bible’s account of the plagues with the relevant parts of the Ipuwer Papyrus.

The first plague (turning the Nile to blood). The Nile River, which formed the basis of daily life and the national economy in Egypt, was devastated as millions of fish died and the water was unusable. Pharaoh was told by God, “By this you will know that I am the LORD” (Exodus 7:17). The Ipuwer Papyrus says, “Plague is throughout the land. Blood is everywhere” (2:5–6). “The river is blood. . . . Men shrink from tasting—human beings, and thirst after water” (2:10). “That is our water! That is our happiness! What shall we do in respect thereof? All is ruin” (3:10–13).

The fifth plague (the death of livestock):

God protected His people from this plague, while the cattle of the Egyptians died. God was steadily destroying the economy of Egypt, while showing His ability to protect and provide for those who obeyed Him. Pharaoh even sent investigators (Exodus 9:18–35) to find out if the Israelites were suffering along with the Egyptians, but the result was a hardening of his heart against them. The Ipuwer Papyrus says, “All animals, their hearts weep. Cattle moan” (5:5). “Behold, cattle are left to stray, and there is none to gather them together (9:2–3).

The seventh plague (hail and fire):

This hail was unlike any that had been seen before. It was accompanied by a fire which ran along the ground, and everything left out in the open was devastated by the hail and fire. Again, the children of Israel were miraculously protected, and no hail damaged anything in their lands (Exodus 9:35). The Ipuwer Papyrus says, “Forsooth, gates, columns and walls are consumed by fire” (2:10). “Lower Egypt weeps. . . . The entire palace is without its revenues. To it belong [by right] wheat and barley, geese and fish” (10:3–6). “Forsooth, grain has perished on every side” (6:3). “Forsooth, that has perished which was yesterday seen. The land is left over to its weariness like the cutting of flax” (5:12).

The ninth plague (darkness):

For three days, the land of Egypt was smothered with an unearthly darkness, but the homes of the Israelites had light (Exodus 10:22–23). The Ipuwer Papyrus says, “The land is without light” (9:11).

The tenth and last plague (the death of firstborn males). Every household that did not apply the blood of the Passover sacrifice saw the death of the firstborn (Exodus 12:23). The Ipuwer Papyrus says, “Forsooth, the children of princes are dashed against the walls” (4:3 and 5:6). “Forsooth, the children of princes are cast out in the streets” (6:12). “He who places his brother in the ground is everywhere” (2:13). “It is groaning throughout the land, mingled with lamentations” (3:14).

The Ipuwer Papyrus also contains a possible reference to the Hebrews’ departure from Egypt, laden with treasures: “Gold and lapis lazuli, silver and malachite, carnelian and bronze . . . are fastened on the neck of female slaves” (3:2; cf. Exodus 12:35–38). Further, there is a possible description of the pillar of fire: “Behold, the fire has mounted up on high. Its burning goes forth against the enemies of the land” (7:1; cf. Exodus 13:20–22).

Egyptologist David Rohl, who doesn’t claim to be a Christian, has written two books on how biblical accounts relating to Egypt, Joseph, and Moses are astonishingly accurate. He believes Joseph and Moses were historic characters and cites Bronze Age slave lists containing Hebrew names, the grave goods of an underclass discovered at Avaris (the biblical Goshen), and Egyptian “plague pits” full of skeletal remains.

Daily reminder that if you don't believe the universe looks like this you really don't believe in the bible, you believe whatever you want for whatever reason suits you better. But if you believe this you'd have to be either an Iron Age camel jockey or insane.

>ironically uses wikiislam as a source
>ironically doesn't believe the 10th Biblical plague was evil

The source of these quotes is 1. a reddit thread 2. "gotquestions".org, a christian proselytism site
>not an argument

>The message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
1 Corinthians 1:18

>let me ignore those facts because they've been shared on sites that I don't like
wew

I meant "unironically" for both of those

>facts

>The archeological evidence does not support the story of the Exodus, and most histories of ancient Israel no longer consider it relevant.[10][11]
>Nevertheless, Ipuwer has often put forward in popular literature as confirmation of the Biblical account, most notably because of its statement that "the river is blood" and its frequent references to servants running away. An extension of the same reading is the idea that both Ipuwer and the Book of Exodus are records of a volcanic eruption on the Aegean island of Thera. These arguments ignore the many points on which Ipuwer contradicts Exodus, such as the fact that its Asiatics are arriving in Egypt rather than leaving, and the likelihood that the "river is blood" phrase may refer to the red sediment colouring the Nile during disastrous floods, or may simply be a poetic image of turmoil.[4]
>"facts"

reshafim.org.il/ad/egypt/texts/ipuwer.htm

>Copypastes a load of shit
>he actually thinks I'm a muslim instead of someone just calling him a fuckwit

you did this yesterday, too. don't bother replying if you can't handle a valid argument.

I think you might genuinely have something wrong with you. Schizophrenia, maybe.

Abd Al-Makr pls.

>Ipuwer Papyrus
> Ipuwer is often put forward in popular literature as confirmation of the Biblical exodus story, but these arguments ignore the many points on which Ipuwer contradicts Exodus.[4]
>The archeological evidence does not support the story of the Exodus, and most histories of ancient Israel no longer consider it relevant.[10][11]
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipuwer_Papyrus

He's a born-again christian from /x/. /x/! What else could it possibly be?

>its Asiatics are arriving in Egypt rather than leaving
[proof needed]

>born-again christian
Wrong.

>Thinks he knows shit
>Doesn't even know that "Abd Al-Makr" isn't even the right phrase he want and that he's been saying the wrong thing the whole time.

A falseflagger I'd guess

I asked you in a separate thread, you literally posted that you were born-again rather than Protestant. Unles that's changed, or there are two of you?

Christards believe this.

Reformation Protestantism, Late Roman Mystery cults and Wahhabism.

Polytheism is boring as fuck to bee honest.

>implying
Abd = servant
Al-Makr = Allah

>you literally posted that you were born-again rather than Protestant
I didn't.

You are implying that Abd al-Makr means "Slave of the Plotter", which it doesn't.

desustorage.org/his/thread/1145528/#1145963
Is this another Christ-poster?

>>Polytheism is boring as fuck to bee honest.
>Not wanting a titty job from Freya while you assfuck Aphrodite.
Sorry dude, not seeing how this is boring.

I made the post that is right below his, 4 seconds later.

So you unironically mean "Servant of the Deception/Plot" rather than "Servant of the Deceiver/Plotter"? Okay then.

...