Muslim """""warfare""""""

There were 2 battles of Covadonga. Both with the same results

Fun fact, the term Moor actually originates from the word "More." After the conquest of Spain, the local Iberian men would hear their wives shouting "MORE! MORE!" when Moorish men paid them a visit

puny muslims amirite

>Not understanding how siesta works
Reconquista mostly happened in short periods of time. Ferdinand the Saint conquered more land than all his predecesors combined.

Moor is a fruit in Spanish (mora). This is because the spaniards made muslim woman so wet that it looked like juice. Prove me wrong. Pro tip you cant

>Spanish women spoke English
Sure thing, Ahmed.

>spanish """""resistance"""""

le lol

OH YEAH? Fun fact, "Moor" is a transilliteration in English as "whore" as in what the Spanish women thought of muslim men.

>700-800 Christians vs 120,000-200,000 Muslims
>Muslims win
>Nominal victory, but practical defeat
So fucking strong, aren't they.

What? Your comment doesnt even make sense.

Remind me what religion is dominant in Spain today Abdul.

remind me again who become literally kebab for five hundred years alberto

So is it true that Spanish people are basically Moorish Rape Babies?

The idea that any conquered group has all of its women immediately impregnated by the conquerors is retarded.

africa begins at the pyrenees

There's lots of fun examples.

Is this a meme? The Muslims had like ~2,000 troops and lost about 600 according to more reliable research. When you don't even know the year of the battle you can pretty much disregard numbers anyway

Next you're going to claim that 300 Spartans held off 2 million Persians.

indeed

>africa ends at the pyrenees
Fixed it for you

Basically, practically, realistically, scientifically, statistically, absolutely yes.

>Byzantine
>Empire
Are you this desperate Ahmed? What is next? Bragging about beating India?

>This muslim revisionism.
Still mad that based Pelayo was enlighted by God himself to defeat the moorish hordes

Yeah, it's not like three empires fell to them or anything.

numbers from battles previous to the 17th century are pretty much always flawed and tend to give a major boost to the victors
but this happens every now and then, but it's mostly because disease broke out during sieges, a major natural catastrophe happened or something like that

...

>one side supported by 10 nations
>the other by 0

i want to know who's behind this post, right now!

There's literally a list of nine nations supporting the Arab side in that pic.

>falling for obvious bait while knowing why it's bait

i counted one more by mistake... but what i was trying to say is that israel won that "war" because they're pretty much US pet state therefore they should also be in the "supported by" category

>Israel supported lightly by France and that is it
>Arabs supported by USSR and they outnumber Israel by a longshot

Stay bottmad, Ahmed

In 1967, the US did nothing to support Israel.

Pre-67 and post-67 Israel are two very different animals.

The pre-67 is made out of win and crazy, post-67 has a lot more burger clientelism.

>six day war
>supported by the USA

The Israelies shot at us specifically to try and get us to help them. World's shittiest false flag but I digress.

And you know, Egypt was doing fine and dandy until their politicians interfered with the military and they advanced past their advanced SAM positions. And then they got fucked.
The other guys were just completely incompetent from the get go.

>Syria deployed a Panzer IV during the war
>the Israelis deployed Shermans
>Israel won
Sherman stronk Wehraboos btfo

It was the opposite actually, they shot at the Liberty because they were afraid they were reporting on IDF positions for the Egyptians. US was not especially close to Israel at this time and was closer to Jordan, who Jordan was fighting. There was also no need for the US to intervene on Israel's behalf, at the time of the Liberty incident the Arabs were losing grievously.

And the "advancing past their SAM positions" is a quasi-true quasi-myth from the Yom Kippur War, not 6 day war. Nearly every Egyptian SAM position in the 6 day war was knocked out in the opening hours of the attack.

>that one time some dumbfuck Portuguese king went into battle and ended up getting killed.

Fuck Sebastião.
What a poor excuse for a King in the mountain

The CIA came up with what I think is still the most convincing explanation.

The USS Liberty was mistaken for an Egyptian ship, but the process of errors that allowed that to happen was so ridiculously stupid that it would be less embarrassing if it had been on purpose.

>spaniards thinking they're relevant
GOOD JOB BEING THE ONLY EUROPEANS CONQUERED BY MUSLIMS AND HAVING TO HAVE THE FRENCH SAVE EUROPE
GOOD JOB BEING A MAJOR WORLD POWER ONLY BECAUSE YALL WERE THE FIRST AND THEN IMMEDIATELY GOT SHREKT WHEN A COMPETENT NATION STARTED CHALLENGING YOU

>187,000 Muslim soldiers hunting half a dozen Christians in the forests of Asturias

Do you realize that the narrative has already become retarded in the first line?

...

>implying he died
the prophecised chronicles have been very specific: "during a foggy day, our king sebastian will arrive mounted on a white horse to bring our kingdom to its former glory"

have hope, m8... have hope

>"We have offered them (the Arabs) a sensible way for so many years. But no, they wanted to fight. Fine! We gave them technology, the latest, the kind even Vietnam didn’t have. They had double superiority in tanks and aircraft, triple in artillery, and in air defense and anti-tank weapons they had absolute supremacy. And what? Once again they were beaten. Once again they scrammed. Once again they screamed for us to come save them. Sadat woke me up in the middle of the night twice over the phone, “Save me!” He demanded to send Soviet troops, and immediately! No! We are not going to fight for them." -Leonid Brezhev

Not exactly, the darker Spaniards probably have some North African descendants though.

>some

HEH.

Ex-muslim here, muslims, whether they are invading Kashmir or Palestine, think god is on their side and will miraculously give them the edge on their opponents.

go back to the porn gifs you cuck

meming aside what happened?

>European ''kingdoms''
>European ''''''''''''''''''''''Empires''''''''''''''''''

Hello darkness my old friend..

Pelayo was literally cucked and he went mad. (his sister was into the moor king harem)

Fucking kek.

Pelayo beat the shit out of muslims and founded the kingdom of Asturias. A couple of years later he died fighting a bear

>yfw his son was also killed by a bear and his dinasty ended there

>Ottoman """"""military""""""

>suleiman the magnificent
>magnificent

>giving it back to the roaches
>not ethnically cleansing it

literally why

>Vietnam

The fuck?

You know, arabs really suck at war.

IIRC there was an earthquake that made part of the mountain collapse, killing all those sandniggers

...

Some vietnam war soldiers were black. Either from france or US invasions.

Israel should be nuked at the earliest opportunity

bulgaria 14% wtf?

Wtf is this map? J is on par with the I haplogroup, both coming from a common ancestor (IJ). Its split in to J1 Semitic and J2 Caucasusian (J2a Indo-European and J2b Greco-Anatolian)

It would be 718 AND 722 then genius

And how does saying less of them died in a battle vs Christians one time help that?

My beautiful Poland left untouched

I find it interesting how you cut out that the Ottomans had a much bigger army than the Christian coalition for this battle.

Why are the Japs so infinitely based?

What's so surprising? They have a large Turkish and Tatar population since they've been a part of the Ottoman empire for centuries.

Based Poland keep Europe clean again plz

These numbers seem like extreme bullshit. I know that most of you are meming but with Veeky Forums you can never be sure

Battle of Viena was the bigset mistake in my country history tbqh

Indigenous muslims.
Similarly in Poland and Baltic countries you have Tartars who lived there for like 500 years.

Nah, most israel's wars were won in very characteristic, specific manner.

Syrians were like "huh, we'll just wait so Egyptians will do the heavy lifting"
Egyptians were like "huh, we'll just wait so Jordanians will do the heavy lifting"

and so on and so on

Which ended up in Israeli military turning the war into short, one-sided blitz.

Basically Jews>>>>>>Ayyyrabs

Most of the fighting in that conflict was between European warships and shitty Indian excuses for boats

>1500's
>portugal
>warships

the best we had was a few and very rudimentar man of war/trade (náus) with a couple of cannons that had very little of warship in them

they were superior to the indian navy, but the gap was minimal if you compare it to later navies from wealthy nations filled with ships of the line against broken third world nations

>three
???

>"only Europeans"
Then again, Britain is technically just an island off the coast of Europe, so you could be right.

>GOOD JOB BEING THE ONLY EUROPEANS CONQUERED BY MUSLIMS

since when is Greece and the balkans not part europe?

or Sicily?

>facts that aren't relevant

Okay cool but I'm talking about those Portuguese ships against the shitty pieces of floating driftwood that the Indians called ships. What does it matter how they compared against other European ships if they didn't fight any in this specific conflict?

>religion of peace

>Covadonga
>Umayyad
Apparently I've turned 14 again.

Rofl why does wikipedia put this silly numbers on there? They are clearly Herodotus tier.

>isreal
>not supported by anybody
c'mon wikipedia basic history isnt this hard