1933 to 1945 who was worse?

1933 to 1945 who was worse?

Ur mum puts out more than a t34 factory

What do you mean worse? Not even trolling but what do you mean.

>regime
both were equally bad

>soldiers
according to the people who could compare between the two, Soviets were far worse

Probably Nazis but both,ironically enough, are examples of the worst humanity could possibly offer despite diametrically opposed to each other politically

>"according to the people"

You mean according to your own opinion and imagination right? Nazis committed numerous war crimes against people on both fronts.

Who, when, and where are these supposed "people"?

Soviets by far. Hitler was responsible for the deaths of 6-8 million Jews, Gypsy's, gays, the mentally and physically disabled.

Stalin killed 20 million of his own fucking people to stay in power.

People from countries that suffered both regimes and there are a couple of them.
My family members for example.

You also seem to be forgetting the 26 Million murdered by the Nazis in Eastern Europe.

One of the elder told me that nazis wanted kill everyone in the house because they were scared and a romanian soldier talked them down

Soviet came, ate some cabbage and went on killing nazis

You decide

Nazis without a doubt

The Nazis killed far more than 6 million people

Hitler, if only because at the end all his abuse of power amounted to fucking nothing.

soviets at least had good intentions

He didn't say Nazis killed only 6 million people.

What are these? Not him, just genuinely intereted.

Why are people replying to this meme thread?

During peace-time, the Soviets, during the war, the Nazis.

Nazis, by far and away.

Stalin wasn't exactly good, but it's not like he was rounding up people into camps for the explicit purpose to annihilating their entire race or declaring war on the entire planet.

Right

How diametrically opposed were they actually politically? I've always wondered this -- I only have a basic understanding of Stalinism and Nazism and they don't seem massively different.

So did the Nazis, to be fair. They wanted to make Germany self sufficient and strong. They wanted to make it so that Germany could finally be rich and respected. And then somethingsomethingkillthesemites. Point being, both had fine intentions, but turned out to be mass-murdering assholes that will forever be a very crude and ugly stain on human history.

>implying it matters WHY someone commits mass murder
>implying Stalin did not want to control the entire world, like all Marxists

Where did all these god damn pinkos come from?

It does.
Had Hitler won a lot of ethnicities that still exist would now be extinct. Stalin on the other hand DID win and Ukrainians or whatever are alive and (relatively) well.

>implying Stalin did not want to control the entire world, like all Marxists
He didn't, hence why he shat all over Marxism and established socialism in one country then had Trotsky assassinated who actually wanted communism to take over the world.

Nice going wiki warrior

Anyone in this thread that says Nazis is either straight up fucking retarded or brain dead tankies with an agenda.

The Nazis lost.

So in a very literal sense they are indeed worse. Every other way of looking at it is simply open to opinion.

I'd say the soviets if only because they had a larger population to make suffer. The Gestapo and the NKVD used almost exactly the same methods and punishments and even targeted roughly the same type of individuals (read: in many cases completely innocent people).

I don't remember the detalis and would appreciate someone expanding on this but there's an account about two soldiers whose fathers were caught by their respective secret police and their letters on the matter are basically the same.

Would you either be raped or gassed

If Hitler died or abdicated in 1938 after the Anschluss he would be regarded as the greatest German to ever live.

I think the USSR is worse despite Hilter going full retard after the Mussolini peace deal and literally fucking up everything he accomplished from ideology and actual physical buildings.

Wouldn't Tankies be the ones looking forward to getting raped by the Red Army?

they are both products of socialism, real the Road to Serfdon, most poeple oposed them but they shared a lot of institutions.

The lovely fruits of democracy

At this point it's not worth quantifying. It's undeniable that both did some of THE MOST FUCKED UP SHIT of the 20th century, but you can't really just outright say that one of them is better or worse.

>look i made -another- thread for /pol/ and /leftypol/ to shitpost about each other

>who was worse
This is a political question. To be a historical question you'd need to specify a lens, for example, the Nuremberg trials. For the Nuremberg trials no Soviets were prosecuted. QED.

By specifying the lens, you're specifying the answer. Which lens is selected is a political issue. Therefore you are solely asking a political question. Fuck off to