Spot the difference

You, retard, you didn't even bother to read the wikipedia page about him before spouting your bullshit here?

His mother was 100% native Sardinian, his father was Italian with some distant Albanese heritage, he was born in a Sardinian village and lived in Sardinia for all of his childhood and most of his teenage years.

He is Sardinian.

I think that people started trying to discredit gramsci after /pol/-tier fuckers figured out that what he says is dangerous to their continued existence. The irony is that /pol/sters are trying to build their own cultural hegemony while denouncing the theory as evil Jewish cultural Marxism, as if that's a real thing outside of the diseased minds of those mindless fucks.

>ones ideas have been the most valuable to the CIA
>the ones makes mongol balls jokes

FTFY

>I think that people started trying to discredit gramsci after /pol/-tier fuckers figured out that what he says is dangerous to their continued existence.
>evil Jewish cultural Marxism, as if that's a real thing
wew lad

/pol/ in action, using dead memes instead of using arguments. How's grade 11 treating you?

desu they'll discredit anyone jewish it doesn't matter if its gramsci or benjamin or adorno all their ideas are interchangeable and not different apparently

Just goes to show that they don't read anything by the authors. So many of these cucks go by secondary or tertiary sources. They fill their minds with right wing propaganda and then they call everybody else cucks. They're too cucky, so the irony goes over their heads.

It would be interesting to see if anyone has written anything linking their ideas

How is cultural marxism a spook? Can you give yourself over to an idea which you oppose?

Bit rich coming from someone sprinkling "cuck" every third word.

to engage deeply with the substance of any one individual kike idea is itself a sort of trap. Like human beings, jews sometimes have different gradients in their individual value systems, different politics. There are neoconservative jews, anti-zionist jews, atheist jews, observant jews, and the power center of New York, home to roughly the other half of the world jewry, is sufficiently bustling with "diverse" jew thought that several of them regularly make their way over to fox news to gab in a segment.

But what the jew has in common, above all else, is his internally chauvinistic group identity as survival mechanism. Somewhere in the back of his pate, he knows to stay with his own. That is the real reason why many atheist jews 'come home'. The jews' trouble is that he has so much excess mental energy, and his religion and his culture require a /genuinely/ hateful level of chauvinism to make a brownshirt blush, that he can dissipate by diverse individuals, these manias of his. Until he is caught well off-guard as previously in the exceptional example, or otherwise wears out his welcome, and is expelled again as per usual. He cannot shake his hatreds, his resentments, his chauvnisms. He is, at the bottom of his heart, even more intractable in these than any bald-pated German.

The point being that all other political flirtations and labels with which jews secondarily affiliate themselves, are always and only ever, secondary to the /primary/ concern, label, identity, which the jew more caringly adheres to, which is, simply, jew. jews first.

So you see, friends, you believe that you are wise, or well-read, or learned when you differentiate between "jew who believes x" and "jew who believes y". But you fail to recognize that x and y are always and only ever secondary considerations. The nose knows...

"x and y are subordinated to the prime directive: jews first."

/pol/ is always right. Do you know that?

Cuck

I'd say Gramsci was a retard, whereas Zizek is more of a clown

What you're saying is pretty funny, because Gramsci has been pretty much appropriated by the European new right since the 1970s.

Wow, great arguments, 10/10 post.

t. nuraghe

>mfw Gramsci is impossible to discredit

...

...