Whole post is stupid. Not sure where to start, not sure I should bother.
I guess I could start with, "Surprisingly, the study showed no genetic basis for a single “Celtic” group, with people living in Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and Cornwall being among the most different form each other genetically."
theguardian.com/science/2015/mar/18/genetic-study-30-percent-white-british-dna-german-ancestry
How could that have happened? I'm not going to explain. You can sit there and be ignorant, because I don't like you much.
>Furthermore there were probably maybe 100 dudes actually from Italy living in Britain back then amongst the Celtic population.
100 Roman citizen soldiers ("Roman soldiery contributing to DNA which is not 100% Celtic" [which was my quote] means jack dick about actual Italian Peninsula people) over 500 years? Seems legit. I hate your face.
>There were no Italians colonizing in the thousands anywhere.
Sigh. No one said "Italians". It's the voices in your head. Are you the guy who keeps jumping the gun in other threads, acting like he knows what he's talking about?
>One of the theories as to how the Saxons came..
No one asked this. Maybe the whole issue here is that you're hallucinating.
>With Roman collapse, it was a perfect power vacuum.
Right, which is why the Britons staved them off for half a century, initially. You're so clever.
>If you want to know for linguistics too, Latin came and left with the Romans.
Because Latin speakers didn't die in the 6th century's conflicts and the survivors didn't grow up, then, speaking invader language. Because monks like Gildas didn't speak and write Latin. Because Welsh. Because go talk about something with which you're more familiar, like picking your nose and cooking peoples' fry orders.
>Latin reintroduced by Normans
Please just go. Latin was incorporated into English in the Enlightenment.
Really. Stop. Just... stop.
Don't reply. Don't even apologize.
Stop.