This guy posting the chicks is a fucking contrarian retard.
I can't even be bothered reading what you type
Is Bitcoin a false flag?
Eli Richardson
Carter Nelson
>About a year and a half ago they started spamming the blockchain meme to try and distract the goyim from bitcoin
There really hasnt even been that many mainstream articles on blockchain tech. All the spam is coming from crypto media (i.e. coindesk, cointelegraph, etc.) who regurgitate the news ad nauseum. The bitcoin crowd loves this news because they collectively feel that banks looking in to blockchain tech validates and legitimizes bitcoin. I find it hard to believe that the uses between bank run blockchain tech and bitcoin itself would be at all compatible, but thats just me. Every time that major news outlets post anything blockchain related, they mention bitcoin. I don't see how it detracts from bitcoin at all, rather it pushes it to the limelight. If they really wanted bitcoin to go away they would not mention bitcoin at all and let it fade into obscurity. Again, I am just not to sure with your analysis that banks are trying to crush bitcoin. There are a lot more damaging things that they can do than write glowing articles about the tech and put it on magazine articles and talk favorably about it on bloomberg. I'm not seeing any war on bitcoin at all here.
Cooper Jenkins
Fuck. These hot chinky girls are positively distracting.
Josiah White
Again, they can't do shit nothing about it but trying to do damage control, in other words, rebrand Bitcoin as "blockchain tech" and release their own shit. When you try to ban something, you just raise it's popularity, case in point: Russia. The more you scare people away, the more curiosity it creates around it.
They can't do nothing about Bitorrent, they can't do nothing about Bitcoin, it is what it is.
>With bitcoin on the cover. Talking about bitcoin specifically. Why have it on the cover at all if bitcoin is such a threat? Why give it any amount of credibility?
Read point above. It's too late to try to act as if Bitcoin doesn't exist. Talking about blockchain tech without talking Bitcoin would expose them.
>Not exactly.
Yes exactly. Cheap as fuck electricity = free money, so they naturally became mining leaders. If it helps moving capital around, good for them too.
There's a lot of racism around China being a leading Bitcoin force. If they were some northen European country, there wouldn't be so many weird theories around it.
If other countries aren't invested in Bitcoin is because they are too dumb to see the importance of being well positioned yet.
The US is constantly saying Bitcoin is used by deep web pedophiles and terrorists funding ISIS and shit, I've seen it on TV several times, but the view with slowly have to become more netural or even show the positive side, just like the internet was something that weird freaks used at the early stages.
And again, it doesn't even fucking matter, who created it, as long as it's open source. TOR was greated by US army, and now they can't stop it, they can't do shit about it other than some lame tricks and exploits that don't do shit at a core level.
Bitcoin will eventually mutate to schnorr signatures anyway, so all that dumb paranoia about how it uses an algorithm that has ties to the NSA will be over.
Adrian Lopez
Blythe Masters did a fucking cover with Bloomberg magazine, "It's all about the BLOCKCHAIN". Are you fucking kidding me.
You may honestly be too dumb to read between the lines to see war beyond direct attacks. The rabbit hole hole goes way deeper.
Julian Myers
>If Satoshi really is one of the top cryptographers in the world with libertarian leanings, why would he knowingly use elliptical curve cryptography to generate private keys when he knows the NSA has had backdoors to ECC in the past?
fun fact! Satoshi used Secp256K1 instead of secp256r1 which was NIST approved and we late come to find out, thanks to Eddie Snow,that it was owned and had a back-door. So.. Satoshi was smart enough not to use the NIST one... explain that. you can't1
Jackson Johnson
Why would they need to ban it or rebrand it if they created it? Obviously it serves some purpose to them. Even if bitcoin is a threat (which I don't believe, since I think that it is a trojan horse), there would absolutely no reason to spin a positive light on it in major news outlets. I don't agree with you that all of the reporting is just on blockchain tech. They report favorably on bitcoin as well. If they were trying to kill bitcoin, wouldn't the best course of action be to let it fade into obscurity and not bring it to the public eye so often?
>importance of being well positioned yet
Positioned for what? China already controls the majority of the mining and the the majority of the transaction volume. The rest of the world has let them have bitcoin. I would tend to agree with you if we have seen some major increase in transaction volume from anywhere else, or even a push towards that, but we don't. Even the US, which used to control most bitcoin transactions has lost enormous ground to China and has not tried to reclaim it. If anyone was worried about China completely cornering and dominating the bitcoin market, nobody has shown it.
Daniel Brown
>bloomberg.com
>bloomberg.com
>m.reddit.com
>bitcointalk.org
So much for your theory that bloomberg only writes good articles for blockchain tech and not bitcoin specifically. That is just a few articles (there are more) and that is just one major news outlet. Again, where is this war that you are alluding to? I see 10 bitcoin praise pieces for every 1 that offers even the slightest negative connotations. I really am beginning to think that bitcoin users created this ficticious war because if banks and governments are not really concerned then you probably woudnt like the implications.
Angel Perry
>bloomberg.com
>One cause for that will probably be the lower-than-anticipated pace of consumer bitcoin adoption. Sharp swings in the digital money's value against the dollar and other currencies will continue to turn off users and make bitcoin impractical for everyday purchases.
All articles always tend to end like this.
Dude you are fucking annoying. I alread told you, they would look like retards acting as if Bitcoin doesn't exist, they can't let it fade into obscurity, none of those articles saying Bitcoin is awesome.
Again, nothing of this matters as long as the project is open source, TOR was created by US Army, so fucking what, they can't stop it now. There are no tricks behind the curtain. The only legitimate conspiracy theory is the Bitcoin hardfork one, where they try to take control of Bitcoin via a hardfork to kick the current dev team (example, Bitcoin XT which had anti-privacy code, Bitcoin Classic is a less agressive one but is anti node decentralization added to the Gavin-Wright conspiracy as well)
Other than that, no, Bitcon will save your ass once they remove physical cash, so start learning how it works now and be thankful you even know it exists. You can either do this, or keep fabricating arguments into your head to justify your fear to buy in and get involved.
Oliver Ortiz
Fuck bitchcoin buy ethereum