Are his history videos any good?

Go away, Sargon.

neither is anything sargon has ever said despite him thinking it was an argument

>the most powerful person in the world literally cites the wage gap myth
>if you argue against this you're a reverse SJW and just as bad as everyone on tumblr
Wow, it really makes you think!

Not to mention Sargon has never claimed or acted like men are oppressed. Rather he's insisted those in the western world live under a meritocracy, and none of us truly are oppressed. But nah, he's clearly just as bad, what a fat fuck moron.

Ah, that guy and his phillippics.

The saddest aspect is that someone like him gets paid for taking the stand he does. Meta af.

Relax bro, the president of the United States is a feminst. Multi-billion dollar corporations are openly colluding with western governments to try and guide online conversations in the direction you like.

So shhhh. Everything's gonna be ok, the establishment has your back.

I don't follow. Sorry. If you're implying that I took a side in anything then my post must have been truly awful to have made believe that.

May be if I tried memes.
>He's not the hero they need, he's the hero they deserve.

...

I really like this post 2bh and would subscribe to your newsletter if you had one.

>I value facts which is why I take a stand against feminist lies

>WHAT YOU THINK RACE CORRELATES WITH IQ? DON'T YOU KNOW THE ONLY REASON AFRICA AND INDIA DIDN'T CONQUER THE WORLD IS POPULATION DENSITY? YES INDIA AND ASIA MAY BE THE MOST POPULATED PLACES ON PLANET EARTH BUT THE REASON THEY'RE BACKWARDS IS JUST IMPERIALISM. t.sarcum of mossad

>Wage gap
>Myth

youtube.com/watch?v=it0EYBBl5LI

>that video thumbnail

Much like other Gamergaters and "MUH ESSJAYDUBBLEYAS" YouTubers, he feeds off the viewership of alt-right reactionaries who need something to during their refractory periods between bouts of furious masturbation to black cuckold pornography. Anything pertaining to history will be tainted by this. It's about as good factually as any mid-tier internet quasi-pedagogue, but the WE WUZ is so strong as to be off-putting.

To quote the man himself
>Buzzfeed, you can shut up and fuck off. White men are the ONLY people on Earth it is okay to mistreat.

This is what goobergaters actually believe.

>ITT: People who have never watched any of Sargon's history videos

The videos where he reads historical texts are good. Comfy audiobooks for free.

The fact that they're narrated by Sargon's smug voice is already a price.

Fair.

Better than anything in this shit board.

But still subpar.

His history videos are just him reading actual historical sources, so yes.

THEY'LL CALL YOU NAZIS

Better than most readers. Ive tried listening to some librivox books but they've always been awful. Sargon's audiobook videos are decent.

>viewership of alt-right reactionaries

Except that Sargon is literally nothing like that. He has alt-right viewers, who are always the most vocal when he says something along the lines of "i think the welfare state is a good idea".

Also he has done polls like 6 times about the political leaning of his viewer base, and it always comes out as left-leaning.

Doesn't necessarily equate to "men are oppressed". But he isn't wrong. Treating men badly has the least negative connotations even if men are the least "oppressed" demographic.

/pol/tards actually tried to raid one of his polls because he's a "cuck"

Isn't he one of those 'I take ridicolously redundant feminist shitposting seriously, let me explain why this one article is wrong in an hour long video'?

He literally is a cuck though. Literally. He raises another man's child.

What a "great" video

nice projection desu

>this is what people think cuckold actual means

youtube.com/watch?v=AB9VfJZ7CfU

soak in the pretentiousness

>Treating men badly has the least negative connotations
It doesn't.
Black guy tries to buy a BB gun at Walmart and gets shot.
White guy shoots up a church and he gets burger king.

>housework is a job

Wew lad, I normally defend crashcourse history but this time he's going too far.

>In evolutionary biology, the term is also applied to males who are unwittingly investing parental effort in offspring that are not genetically their own

outside a home it would be termed a job....what else do you call cleaning, doing laundry, cooking etc

They're doing it for their own benefit, not just their family's.

By that logic me making a sandwich for myself constitutes a job

Your duty to not live like an animal? Washing old man is a job. Is taking a shower everyday a job too?

I should add that by no means I think the wife should do it all, specially not if she's working too. But considering it a job is just ridiculous, it's going too far like I already said.

ITT: People who have literally never watched a Sargon video and don't have the brain cells required to understand what he's saying.

>He thinks cuck is a scientific term.

truly only the enlightened are capable of taking in something so profound

>this /pol/-meme again
Feel like providing a source for this claim?

>muh false dichotomies

I am not sure about your country, but over here it's always talked about as if the boss choses to give them a lower pay, not that they just do wageless work more.

he has a perfect "british intellectual" voice. however, i still feel no desire to watch his videos

...

i don't like him. he seems really autistic about "being right" and comes off like a tinfoil hatter. and anyone who opposes him is supposedly a "SJW"

Zizek, Scaruffi (only for music) and Thunderfoot are good.

The rest I agree, are fucking trash.

>filthy frank
are there people who actually take him seriously?

Who's the guy under Michio Kaku?
I'd add Hitchens to the save pile, but you probably wouldn't.

Someone shpuld do something with dead ones.

That list covers pretty much anyone political with any popular following at all. It just seems like a giant wank designed to make you feel better than everyone else.

I thought filthy frank was an humour channel. I mean, look at this:

youtube.com/watch?v=wsLOicueFRM

How is that pseudo-anything?

Pierro Scaruffi.

The man who hates The Beatles.

>Goobergaters
What the fuck are you doing here. Don't you know this isn't r/ShitRedditSays? Fuck off cuck.

>I care this much about video games
I love how "virgin" is not one of Goobergaters generally used insults.

>poster is making a point about gender
>you respond to him with some racebaiting bullshit that has nothing whatsoever to do with gender as a counterargument
Are you retarded?

If you read Sargon's actual quote it was as follows
>>Buzzfeed, you can shut up and fuck off. White men are the ONLY people on Earth it is okay to mistreat.

Not "men", "white men".

Then that's even more retarded, because white men are more likely to be killed by the police than black men are these days. It's just that the national news media never says jack shit when it happens.

So I still don't see the point.

Proportionally to the population black men are exponentially more likely to be killed on the count there are simply more white people.

And more likely to be arrested for non-violent crimes such as possession for that matter.

>So I still don't see the point
The point is that white men are not the only demographic it's okay to mistreat. As a matter of fact they're probably the most protected demographic bar none.

>Then that's even more retarded, because white men are more likely to be killed by the police than black men are these days. It's just that the national news media never says jack shit when it happens.

Per capita, that simply isn't true.
Say what you will about the liberal bias of the media, minorities are profiled and arrested disproportionately by largely white police forces.

I would say it has less to do with conscious discrimination and more to do with very old tensions in our nation that play out on a daily basis.

His is cancer
Sargon historic vids are good.

>he's a goobergater

But muh eqality! Since we are all the same why you leftist cunts are making any comparissions?

tell me. how does sargon cock taste?

Yes it is, I'm not that person but I agree with the sentiment. Victimhood culture is an invalid form of rhetoric/youth culture that favors emotional appeal to the greedy self absorbed individual over depersonalized logic. Instead of a statement holding universal truth they say "this is mean to people like you and me and therefore what we believe is right, because people that are mean and against us are not right".

Both SJWs and the alt-right have tapped into this sphere of narcissistic identity whine and think circlejerking with each other to purify any dissenting voices counts just as good as correct argument.

"Hilarious" how the alt-right criticizes SJWs for this behavior but can't get the log out of their own eye.

>unwittingly

>The point is that white men are not the only demographic it's okay to mistreat. As a matter of fact they're probably the most protected demographic bar none.
This is retarded, because the standard for what makes women and minorities victims of discrimination is so vastly different. Why is it 'protection' when men get higher prison sentences than women for the same crimes, but 'racism' when blacks get higher sentences than whites crimes? Or are we just supposed to ignore those contradictions?

Feminism has nothing to do with the conversation about race, at all.

The image of equality I'm painting here is the right of black people to not be killed by cops or sent to jail over nothing.

Is that really the kind of equality you're against?

Is anyone who criticizes feminism now alt-right?

Buzzwords: the post

9 times out of 10 yeah.

>Victimhood culture is an invalid form of rhetoric/youth culture
Victimhood culture is now the dominant culture in the west, period. It's preached and taken seriously in state institutions, and even politicians make regular appeals to it. Just look at this person who's in one of the highest offices in the Canadian government wallow in pity for herself after getting bumped, and how nobody calls her on it:

youtube.com/watch?v=FUtCFRp6wBw

I mean, I hate feminism and I made that post so I'm guessing no.

But the fact you immediately twisted it into "I'm so misunderstood and persecuted" says a lot imo.

You know when you criticize SJWs one of their favorite responses is "Oh SJW are a reactionary boogeyman that don't really exists. Anyone that speaks out in favor of equality for women or criticizes being a jerk is SJW now."

So interesting that there is so much parity in style between these two groups.

>“If one adjusts for the racial disparity in the homicide rate or the rate at which police are feloniously killed, whites are actually more likely to be killed by police than blacks,” said Mr. Moskos, a former Baltimore cop and author of the book “Cop in the Hood.”
>“Adjusted for the homicide rate, whites are 1.7 times more likely than blacks die at the hands of police,” he said. “Adjusted for the racial disparity at which police are feloniously killed, whites are 1.3 times more likely than blacks to die at the hands of police.”
washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/21/police-kill-more-whites-than-blacks-but-minority-d/

This is a bait but i'll still reply:

>Black guy tries to buy a BB gun at Walmart and gets shot.

One case. One case. One case. Don't try to act as if this was some normal thing that happens every day.

Besides, we weren't talking about actual oppression we were talking about the connotations of treating someone badly.

Treating blacks badly in the U.S has massive negative connotations due to the history that U.S has with race.

Even your single case example had MASSIVE backlash.

>White guy shoots up a church and he gets burger king.

Point out where in the U.S law does it state that if a white person shoots up a church, he must then be given a burger king.

>Is anyone who criticizes feminism now alt-right?
My response to your post where you were implying Sargon was alt-right.
>But the fact you immediately twisted it into "I'm so misunderstood and persecuted" says a lot imo.
?

>One case. One case. One case. Don't try to act as if this was some normal thing that happens every day.
Judging by how often similar cases happen it may as well be. Not to mention even one case is too many.

>Even your single case example had MASSIVE backlash.
Except the parts where the cops in question get off scot free.

>Point out where in the U.S law does it state that if a white person shoots up a church, he must then be given a burger king.
I don't think it says in US law that if someone is walking while black it means they must be shot, no?
Because it's a lot more complicated than what the law says.

>Except the parts where the cops in question get off scot free.
These cops got off scot free too, and the media had not a word to say about it:

youtube.com/watch?v=DngOL6LokN4

You're still dancing around the point:

I and Sargon in his original video were talking about public opinion, how violence against a certain demographic is perceived.

Men < Women

Whites < Minorities

Even if, they hold privileged positions in society it is irrelevant.

Every time Sargon talks about U.S racial issues, he goes out of his way to point out "they might have a point" or "blacks might be oppressed, i don't really know".

Painting him as some sort of white genocide "muh whites are oppressed" is just misleading and lying.

Kill yourself.

>I and Sargon in his original video were talking about public opinion, how violence against a certain demographic is perceived.
If you mistreat a black dude with the justice system ruining/ending his life it's pretty damn bad. The so called mistreatment due to public opinion against white men is trivial in comparison. Getting called a bigot on the internet is not proof of a society-wide conspiracy of white genocide. Also note that this rhetoric of cultural bias is exactly what the so called SJW's he's against ground their views in.

>Even if, they hold privileged positions in society it is irrelevant.
That is the exact opposite of irrelevant.

KILL YOURSELF

Most of what he does is reading some ancient texts

Say no more, the cops in all likelyhood will beat me to it.

>If you mistreat a black dude with the justice system ruining/ending his life it's pretty damn bad. The so called mistreatment due to public opinion against white men is trivial in comparison.

But that wasn't the topic of the discussion, try and get it into your head.

>Getting called a bigot on the internet is not proof of a society-wide conspiracy of white genocide

And no one claimed it was. You brought this up on your own.

>That is the exact opposite of irrelevant.

Quote mining. I was stating it was irrelevant to the discussion that we were having, which it was.

What? SJWs ground their rhetoric in notions of intersectional privilege and oppression. You're arguing for SJW positions by talking about how racial privilege is the most important issue on the table while claiming your opponent is just as bad as an SJW.

If was ever an appropriate image for anyone, it's you.

...

>But that wasn't the topic of the discussion, try and get it into your head.
Yes it was, you seem to have a very short attention span or either got into the argument just now and didn't realize the context.

>And no one claimed it was. You brought this up on your own.
I was being hyperbolic, sorry.

>Quote mining. I was stating it was irrelevant to the discussion that we were having, which it was.
In any case it is still not as they obtain and maintain their privileged positions with popular approval. Most directly in the government.

"alt-right" it's just a buzzword, the way i've seen it use it doesn't mean anything.
It used to be used to describe white nationalizes, now it describes anyone with a different opinion than an sjw

>Quote mining. I was stating it was irrelevant to the discussion that we were having, which it was.
Indirect oppression caused not by explicit law but by societal and cultural biases that work against women and minorities.

>You're arguing for SJW positions by talking about how racial privilege is the most important issue on the table while claiming your opponent is just as bad as an SJW.
1. I'm not saying racial privilege is the most important issue on the table.
2. I'm not saying my opponent is just as bad as an SJW, nor am I even saying being an SJW is particularly bad. I'm saying this is a very SJW-esque tactic for a supposedly anti-SJW position.