South Slavs were literally the most powerful Slavs

>South Slavs were literally the most powerful Slavs
>alpha conquerors who went furthest and humiliated Roman armies
>taught other Slavs how to read
>built cities while Poles and Russians squatted in forests wiping their ass with their hands
WHERE DID IT ALL GO SO WRONG
REEEEEEEEEEE

>alpha conquerors who went furthest and humiliated Roman armies
Aside from Adrianople they always lost to the Romans.

>taught other Slavs how to read
That was the Greco-Romans.

Oh look, it's another "My culture is the best" thread

So it's basically the old Southern vs Northern European story?

Was the first Bulgarian empire actually Slavic? I am genuinely asking because I'm not sure when the Bulgar's ruling moesia were slavicised.

Just Turk My Shit Up

>no tri moreta

shit map

The empire's population was mostly slavic, however the ruling class was not.

Slavs peaked in the Middle Ages

>Bulgarian Empire
>Serbian Empire
>Great Moravia
>Nitra
>Bohemia with Prague as seat of HRE
>Kievan Rus
>Old Church Slavonic

Both Cyril and Methodius were of Slacic descent,even though they've were born and educated in the Eastern Roman Empire.

Also,their alphabets were mostly based on a pre-Christian Slavic writing system and a smaller variety of letters from the Greek alphabet.

And the South Slavic invaders have only been defeated at Thessaloniki and Constantinople.

They were later slavicized,mostly because of the decisions of Boris the I.

They've spent too much of themselves in their constant battles against the Ottoman Empire.They've been going for 229 years,and at the same time,they had to keep the Venetians and the Hungarians from their backs.

>the most powerful Slavs
this is like bragging about winning a gold medal at the Special Olympics

>First Bulgarian Empire
>Slavs

but cyrillic is basicaly latinized greek alphabet with few slavic specific letters dawg

>Greco-Romans.

but they invented the glagolitic not he cyrillic

An acceptable half-truth.
Because of them,you have AC electricity,digital electronic computing,laser,light-emitting diodes,space travel,electric trams,the radioactive theory,the heliocentric theory,the periodic system of elements,bullet proof vest,grain harvesters,long-range telephones,color television and 743 other inventions(of which the earlier mentioned ones have catapulted Mankind into an age of unlimited technological development).

I bet you're Scandinavian.

>bunch of vlach tribe niggers in a confederation with the slavs


>HURRRR MUH EMPAYAH TRI MORETA NEVER 4GET

sage

This. Every Slavic person I have ever met has been bro tier. Idk how many people can have them and their last 5 generations go through nothing but revolutions, wars, communism and ethnic cleansings and still keep it real. Most of you weebos wouldn't last a minute in their shoes as you "lelkeklmao" because they fucking squat. Bruh most of y'all niggas can't even squat.

The schools in every country in the world teach children that THEIR ancestors were the most awesome and actually responsible for lots of cool stuff that others wrongly take credit for.

Austroslavism is best slavism.

slavs ruined that part of the world and took over from far cooler cultures
illyrians > slavs

t. Tonibler

>no modern Byzantine Empire stretching up to the Danube

There was no Illyrian culture by 900 AD

Heck, there wasn't even one by 100 AD

And peanut butter too, right?

>Heck, there wasn't even one by 100 AD

Nigger there were multiple Illyrian emperors. Diocletian, one of the greatest of them, was Illyrian.

>Diocletian, one of the greatest of them

triggered

>t. Christian

>first Bulgarian empire

Turkic ruling class?

At least someone gets it.

he killed Rome

t. Trve Roman

Unlike "them",our inventors and their respective inventions have been carefully recorded and can be easily traced by name,date and patents.

East Iranic.

>Diocletian, one of the greatest of them, was Illyrian.
He was from Dalmatia, but the Illyrian culture was long dead and replaced by the time he was born.

>shit-eating barbarians that settle closer to civilization than other shit-eating barbarians manage to become more civilized
What a shocker.

>East Iranic.
Source?

>He was from Dalmatia, but the Illyrian culture was long dead and replaced by the time he was born.

If you seriously believe that Roman culture completely and totally eradicated local culture across the empire then you've clearly never read a single book on the subject. Even in more heavily "romanised" regions like southern Gaul and Baetica the locals never lost their tribal and cultural ties. Many of the barracks emperors like Diocletian were IIllyrians serving in the Roman army.

What makes you even think Illyrian culture was dead? Archaeological evidence only ever survives when it is big stone public buildings like bath houses, 99% of the empire's population lived exactly the same way as before Rome turned up in the same wooden houses as before.

>shit-eating barbarians
op isn't talking about gemans, user

as if germanics and celts were any better lmao don't kid yourself Hans Cuckmich von Panzerkiampfwagen IV your ancestors were forest niggers.

>Where did it all go so wrong?
Ottomans and Habsburgs.
This. There is a certain melancholy in it, but the strength and endurance shine.
On point. In terms of scientific accomplishments Slavs together outweigh the Anglos and Germans together.
Hello Tonibler, enjoying heroin and kidneys?

True Slavs are shit but I hope you're not a Scandinavian thinking inventing a fucking cheese slicer was some groundbreaking moment in worlds history.

the word slave originates from slav but in their defense their culture was superior to that of germans and scandinavians who back then were no better than arabs today so if anything it goes

asians > romans > arabs > slavs >>>> scantys & germs

>he thinks Bulgarian are slavsq

I don't know about r1a and all that crap but ethnolinguistically they undoubtedly are Slavic. What's your point?

>>Serbian Empire

That's a valid historiographical term.

> implying the serbian empire wasnt the greatest slavic empire on the balkans

it lasted about a long as a fart

These. I'm not even Slavic but no one can take away their achievements.

>ethno
Nope.
The majority of bulgarians are fair skinned dark haired with light eyes just as the records we have describe the indo Aryan people and thracians Scythians etc.
Also a lot of words in the Bulgarian language have Persian origins.

And in my observations not a lot of people squat around here.
Also Bulgarians were known to be great warriors unlike most Slavs.

>googled Bulgarians
>see this

such fair skin

such light eyes

those are gypsies

modern bulgarians are the same as serbs (which is, turkified slavs)

that's a Mission East center, basically a Danish NGO dedicated to helping dindus around the world

Such white features.

umm, yes. Are we still talking about skin color? Or are we now drifting towards the Veeky Forums definition of white which is "no one"?

>modern bulgarians are the same as serbs (which is, turkified slavs)
Same how? Serbs got all their culture from Bulgarians and Byzantines. They were always a simple principality that had it's go at "empire"for like 20 years.

>turkifies
T*rks didn't mix with Balkan people. Only took them as slaves for the inner parts of the empire

Every fucking slav country talks about muh light skin and eyes just look at this slavwhore

she's still not white and neither are you fucking burgmongols

name a white country

>that skin
>white

guys on the 2nd row are almost as white as the flag

Though there are two theories; exogenic theory claims that the basis for the glagolitic script is the greek minuscule which Cyril styled into a majuscule. The endogenic theory claims that the letters are derived from the forms of circle (symbol of God's perfection) and triangle (trinity). Both theories are equally valid, but the endogenic is more poetic, hence I like it more.

Germany, entire Scandinavia, Switzerland, England, Ireland, France.

>Same how?
by virtue of serbs being more popular on the internets than bulgarians hence a comparison to get the point across better

>muh cherrypicking

by that logic russians are white

I don't care about your notion of white or the stupid label.
The fact is modern Bulgarians are descendents of indo Aryan peoples

That's why you look like gypsies right?

>Ireland

>Germany
full of Turks and now rapefugees
>entire Scandinavia
full of Somalis and Arabs
>Switzerland
full of Albanians and Bosnians
>England
full of Pajeets, Africans and Arabs
>Ireland
mmmaybe
>France
full of Africans

of course they are. Like I said if your definition of white is not "white skin" but is tall, blonde, blue eyes then only a couple faggots in Scandinavia outside the big cities are white

Yes

Because Scandinavians are the purest white people and if someone doesn't look remotely like them then he's not fucking white you slavshit.

>Germany
>Germany
>entire Scandinavia
Fuck off newfag.

>Bulgaria
full of gypsies so much that even refugees are scared of them

>that heavy make up to cover the shit skin

lmao

also facial structure is nowhere near white

guess you're not white then which begs the question why are you obsessed with whiteness

right so I was right - no one is white

Only russians squat and if light skin makes you white then japanese are white as well lmao Bulgariaslav kill yourself you're a living proof slavs are subhuman

>literally every single slav country claims it's not slavic

can't make this up

>literally every single slav country claims it's not slavic
Because its not that simple. You can't just put half of Europe under the same banner.

I'm Scottish you daft gypsie cunt.

when the English pajeets are making fun of how underdeveloped you are you really lose all right to international banter. How's that independence going

The more evil they are the prouder they are of their slavic heritage.

Lmao pathetic you guys just know you are utter shit so you make things up
Bulgars
>we wuz aryans 'n shiet
Poles
>we wuz Sarmatians 'n shiet
Russians
>we wuz Varangians 'n shiet

but you will never escape reality you're just slavs and your countries will always be shit

>Bulgaria and Ukraine breaking the pan-slavic color pattern
muh ocd

ran out of combinations

Macedonia too
>a goddamn rising sun for a flag

Everyone north of the Alps ate shit, don't know where you got the idea I was German.

>tfw no democratic, constitutional Austrian Empire incorporating Austria, Czechia, Slovenia, and Croatia

>Both Cyril and Methodius were of Slacic descent
Proof?

>implying the Soviet Union wasn't the peak of Slavic power

Were the Bulgarian Empires recognized as actual empires in their time or is it just a term used by modern historians?

There is some truth in that theory,considering that particular period in European history, many Slavic tribes were fair game for all kinds of slavers because they weren't Christianized yet.

Except Slavs have downed the Ottoman,Khazar,Swedish and the French Empire while the original Bulgarians were assimilated by the earlier mentioned Slavs after three generations of peaceful coexistence.

Guess who's the bigger failure here?

>Because Scandinavians are the purest white people and if someone doesn't look remotely like them then he's not fucking white you slavshit

Is that why they're carrying an abundant amount of R1a haplogroups in their collective gene pool?Roughly 30%?

Their Mother was Greek,but their father was a Droungarios,and at that time,they were mostly recruited from Slavic ranks within the East Roman Empire.

They were,especially the second one.

Self-hating tendencies are still very strong in most post-Soviet countries,it'll pass,just like everything else.

Also,people that are afflicted with this state of mind are usually very vocal about their opinions,so yeah.

>T*rks didn't mix with Balkan people.

>>South Slavs were literally the most powerful Slavs
>>alpha conquerors who went furthest and humiliated Roman armies
>>taught other Slavs how to read
>>built cities while Poles and Russians squatted in forests wiping their ass with their hands
Odlično

Just slap your CoA on Russian flag like the others