What are the PURELY economics effects of immigrants entering the country?

Pretty sure the economist has an article about the economic effects of Mexican immigrants in the US. Turns out they're actually a net benefit to the economy.

Its a clear net positive for the country. Higher population growth. Higher gdp growth. Increase in demand for all consumer goods. Though primarily inferior goods and housing. Broadens base for welfare and social security. Allows sales tax to become a greater percentage of revenue.

It does have some negative effects on the the unskilled workers in our country and those who must share living spaces in the slums where they like to live; However , using this or the argument that they bring crime is paramount to demanding that we subsidize our own criminal under-class from foreign competition.

In uk 70% of immigrants receive benefits

>The pie is sliced a larger number of times in every case
No, since immigrants with jobs also help producing a bigger pie.

Is that an argument?

Does that connect to anything I said?

Or does it just hut your tribalist lizard brain?

>Higher gdp growth

not GDP/citizen though hahaha

>help producing a bigger pie

Lel not really, no. All they do is disrupt the industries, undercut wages, and make their own countries even poorer.

Regarding illegal immigration in the US:

Lower wages of low-skilled workers
Lower prices of goods
Higher health care costs
Overall increased economic output

I'll just paste what I wrote (which also counts the non-economic effects, but i can't be assed to redact it) in another thread a few days ago:

Assuming the benefit of the few pros is enough to break even on the huge expense of immigrating them in Europe like for food, shelter, welfare, etc. (which is completely absurd considering how they tend to work very little -almost nothing for the women- and always take advantage of every opportunity to leech and be proud of it), you have to consider the cost (for the economy and society) of the very high crime rate, the degradation that they bring, and the significant portion of their paycheck that goes to their country (taking money out of the economy), etc.

Also the hidden consequences like the value of properties in the areas where they go dropping because nobody wants to live with an unwashed mass of refugees as neighbors, or the number of people who move out of the country, or the massive bad publicity that this has brought (which can convince foreign companies to not invest in the affected countires), or the fact that they will never integrate, therefore creating division inside the country (between the locals, the immigrants, their "enablers", etc.) that eventually makes the country weaker as a whole (with all the consequences).

Plus the non-economic benefits such as a less safe country, the diffusion of Islam (take it from an Arab, you don't want a single muslim in your country. Even the good ones, which I'm sure are numerous, are still a huge damage to society for a many reasons) and the consequent rise in the probability of terrorist attacks, the weakening of the population (and its race in case of mixed-race children), since these people are often borderline retarded (seriously, check the average IQ and illiteracy rates of their countries) and very inbred, making the number of stupid people significantly higher (and increading healthcare costs because of the health issues stemming from their inbred genes).
(1/3)

Also middle easterns and africans tend to be a lot more impulsive and aggressive than other races (with the exception of maybe latin americans, they're the most aggressive/animalistic people in the world) and are significantly uglier (I know it's not really important, but if a herder had a herd of top quality white horses he would be crazy to mix them with a huge number of inbred horses of the worst breeds in the world. Imagine if paintings and frescoes died of old age and were capable of reproducing like living beings. Would you put a child's drawing in the Sistine Chapel, allowing Michelangelo's masterpieces to make painting-kids with ugly painting, forever ruining the beauty -and everything else, really- of the group, ruining the quality of the paintings themselves, generation by generation?).

And their culture, even ignoring their religion, is pure cancer under every point of view, as it's directly influenced by Islam and by the life that Islam makes them live (and for Aficans, even if they're not muslims, imagine what kind of people they are by analyzing the place they come from). An example of this are their pedophile tendencies, that of course manifest themselves on arab kids, but also on European kids, when they kidnap-rape them or "groom" them by turning them into addicts and giving them drugs in exchange for sex.
(2/3)