As for how the systematic abuse shaming of men will end, I think we'll just have to run out of money.
Women in general aren't independent of men, certainly a few are, but most are just better propped up by (mostly) men's taxes and shit like that. They're *superficially* independent.
All this largesse they're handed is the reason they're so shitty to men now; they get support either way.
In the Soviet Union, a restaurant would be paid regardless of the quality of service it provided. Support was guaranteed, not something you had to attract by providing quality to customers. Providing quality is hard, and you're getting paid either way, you have no competition, so...why bother providing quality?
It's the same with women now; they're merely responding to the current incentives of their environment. Why be nice and kind when men will have to support you either way? Why provide quality when you get paid either way, and you'll still get dick too since there's a fuckton of desperate simps out there?
If women were forced by the government to provide sex to men, then the quality of relationships would certainly degrade, and there would be fewer relationships at all. The same happens when are forced to provide for women.
But now, look at Greece: they ran out of money, and now their women have no gravy train with biscuit wheels fueled by men's taxes to live on, so what happened?
Many women have turned to prostitution for as little as it costs to buy a sandwich.
Well well, sex for resources, only this time the men get something for it, and there's no government middleman. The superficial "independence" was exposed. The pussy-bubble popped and now we see what it's really worth.
The cost of a fucking SANDWICH. Oh the irony.