If the Efficient Markets Hypothesis is indeed true, what does it imply for traders and investors?

You can check for audited performances on their respective websites so you can educate yourself instead of being butthurt. Sad!

Sorry, my eyes are already raw from the number of ads on the blog trying to sell me super-secret market-beating strategies. I'm not falling for further click-bait.

I especially like how the site has it's own proprietary method of calculating alpha. I guess the industry standard wasn't good enough. Or didn't produce the desired result.

What a joke.

>attacks random website from which i found a couple of sourced articles
>doesn't even attempt to disprove the fact that EMH is invalid due to price distributions being skewed to the right side of the tail
>doesn't know about fat tails and how it is possible to make money with barbell strategies since he has not read Nassim Taleb
>visibly butthurt about his money being hostage of an index over which he has no control over
Low energy

>supports a meme trading strategy with all his heart and soul
>cherrypicks examples and time frames
>cheerleads to the exclusion of rationale critique
>disregards absence of scientific validation
>spouts memes instead of arguments
Low wealth

Never fall in love with your trades, kid. They don't love you back. Like your mom.

>I have no arguments whatsoever therefore memes
>Meanwhile i will further fuel my cognitive dissonance with shitposting so others don't notice it

Can't you admit when you're beat, kid?

Hmm, I'm the only one between us that's made any critical argument. All you've done is post a blog link.

Typical Millennial. Tweeting a Youtube video doesn't make you a media producer.

Still waiting for some evidence to support your claims....

>average three digit returns on average for years
>dozens of traders
Absolute bullshit.

You are the quintessential dumb faggot that plagues trading boards. No hate, just know what a dumb prick you sound.

>If the Efficient Markets Hypothesis is indeed true, what does it imply for traders and investors?

If true, it would imply that profiting from stock trades can only occur under two sets of circumstance:

>The trader has hidden knowledge which is not known by the market AND which has not been introduced to the market via market actions.

>The trader essentially made a bet on whether a stock would rise shortly after purchase, perhaps on the eve of some press release or government report about the relevant company. He is either right or wrong.

The EMH is patent bullshit though, so no worries OP.