Is this a historically accurate WW1 scenario?
Is this a historically accurate WW1 scenario?
Easton Peterson
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
myredditvideos.com
twitter.com
Lucas Ramirez
Is it trying to be realistic? I got the impression from the trailer that it was going with a sort of "WWI on crack" schtick.
Hunter Taylor
Not sure, they are not giving the impression atleast
Josiah Johnson
>Is it trying to be realistic?
It's a video game, senpai.
Evan Allen
I mean, I'm pretty sure aeroplanes and cavalry operated in the same campaigns, so it's not unfeasible to think that something like this COULD'VE happened.
Whether it actually DID or not I don't know.
Wyatt Sullivan
given those are Italian planes shooting at Entente troops (doesn't look like any Central Powers kit) I don't think so
unless it's supposed to be blue on blue
Owen Martinez
Could be Ottoman troops
Joshua Wilson
>Entente planes firing on Entente soldiers
Probably not
Nathaniel Phillips
These fucking normies need to stop ruining my history, keep your autistic CoD weapon customization shit to modern era
Owen Nguyen
Although could also be true, the gun is probably some variant of a Martini-Henry carbine
Tyler Parker
Watching the stream this is fking cringe
It's fking WW1 with modern combat tactics, and they are actually pretending it's historically accurate
Brayden Cooper
>thinking video games have an accurate depiction of what really happened
This is what WW1 was really like: youtu.be
Lucas Perry
is this the official e3 on Veeky Forums thread?
who ready for sony tomorrow, theyll make e3 great again
Tyler Ward
>It's fking WW1 with modern combat tactics
well strictly speaking infantry tactics for most of the war are the ones used throughout the rest of the century, allowing for obvious proliferation of automatic weaponry
Camden Nelson
Will Tom Hanks roast them again?
Juan Fisher
>no France
FUCKING ANGLOS
FRANCE CARRIED THE WAR FOR THREE YEARS
Logan Robinson
Not letting your men go and die for a pointless war in the Middle east turned you into surrender monkeys forever.
Ayden Lewis
>Italy makes it into release
>France doesn't
STOP HE'S ALREADY DEAD
Jose Gomez
The Italians were absolute shit, and there were Entente Troops operating in this theater.
So this could be a friendly fire instance.
Elijah Murphy
will captain miller roast them again*
Brayden Reed
>france
>carrying world war one
mate... the brits protected your arse more than once in that war...
>inb4 brit... I'm a belgian
Aiden Cook
These pictures are much better than actual The Onion at this point
Mason Morgan
They were absolutely pitiful in 1914, could've been done without in 1915, and only started playing a vital offensive part in 1916, the same year that the French army at Verdun literally saved the entire front.
Jonathan Gutierrez
certainly the british were absolutely key in the victory but to somehow diminish the role of france, the single biggest allied combatant in whose very country the key engagements of the entire war were fought, is beyond bizarre
Dylan Ramirez
You're right that France didn't carry the war alone, and that the British took up a significantly greater role in the hundred day's offensive, France was the only thing that kept the Western Front from collapsing. If France had failed at Verdun or the Marne, there wouldn't be anything for the British to bail out.
For example, the Somme Offensive (a case of the British protecting the French) was a secondary operation conceived for the sole purpose of keeping the French line at Verdun from collapsing. Ultimately, it was the British blockade that forced the Germans first to call off the Spring Offensive and then into Armistice; but if the French hadn't held on before that, the Royal Navy would never have had the chance to do so.
Mason Howard
I'm in no way shape or form diminishing the role of the french... but come on, the guys almost had a communist revolution in their ranks because their high command was so incompetent that they bombarded their own trenches... the brits saved them at one point because the french army was collapsing... also, saying like that frenchie did that the brits were absolutely pitiful in 14 and could've been done without in 15 is even more bizarre... without the brits holding out in the western corner of belgium, the french would've been caught with their pants on their knees...