Axes confirmed for pieces of shit!
youtube.com
haha get fucked Veeky Forums your precious axes are dog shit
Axes confirmed for pieces of shit!
youtube.com
haha get fucked Veeky Forums your precious axes are dog shit
Just because swords are superior weapons doesn't mean the axe didn't have its uses in combat.
Also, doesn't Veeky Forums hate swords and agree that axes are generally shit at fucking shit up?
No one hates swords because unlike axes they had some actual uses.
No one has ever said that on here.
Axes are shit, live with it
Why do we need the axes r shit threads daily?
It's just one of our house-hold autists baiting, let him do his thing.
There are 4 other threads in the archive of your anti-axe autism. Why on earth do you obsess so much over this topic, especially after people manage to refute you every fucking time? Do you have some kind of mental disorder?
For education purposes. This time I have someone to back it up and as usual - I was right, Veeky Forums was fucking wrong.
>refute every fucking time
[citation needed]
I suppose so.
Quaint, I've only seen that axes had their place but was generally inferior. Good that you get to feel superior though. Now, please, stop making these threads.
>taking scholagladiatoria seriously
nigger please
Dumb animeposter.
If axes were bad then why would people in so many different cultures use them for so long
lol that your life is so devoid of joy that this is something you feel worth bragging about
Axes have more weight distributed at the end, so it is better against armored assailants. Also, axes doubled as tools, so they were great weapons for peasants becuase they were super useful in so many ways
There is literally nothing wrong with most of Matt's videos
It's a well known fact that the real master race of weaponry are polearms and maces, above all, warhammers.
I agree - except those where he says "tachi" because he pronounces it wrong (tashi).
back to Veeky Forums, everyone knows that the sword is the coolest weapon
>claims the normans weren't french or frankish because he can't accept britain losing to them
lmao
If Australia invaded Indonesia and conquered it, would you say It was an Australian victory, or a British victory?
Normandy is connected directly the france, and culturally at the time was frankish/french (depending on which you consider it in 1066). The northmen had settled there for over a hundred years, had intermarried with the french and had adopted french customs. They were a subculture.
lol vikings conquered like half of the known world with axes and u guys say its useless...
British if it was under the British Empire, t.b.h.
Not Dane Axes.
most, except when he is opining on things he has no expertise in. Has he studied any martial art that include systematic use of an axe or hatchet?
and dont get me started on his katana video
Is it true the katana can cut through sky scrapers?
shaped for shearing
sharp as razors
...
>muh folded 10,000,000 times supersword like in my animes
Literally nothing wrong with his katana vids
You should never take a brit seriously when he's talking about something related to britain. Ever. Brits are worse than Americans when it comes to delusion about their country and history.
I'm glad your reading so much into what I am saying.
There is a lot wrong with it. Katana did change throughout their history, as did the nuance of their use, and chalks his misconceptions up to the Japanese being blindly traditional.
He is a hema guy with a giant chip on his shoulder because of the katana iconic status
at leas skallagrim acknowledges his thoughts are shaped by working with European blades. Matt pretends his hema experience makes him an expert on other types of swords too
Doesn't that video claim axes are roughly equivalent (but different, higher impact less nimble) to swords if you also have a shield?
Or maybe I was thinking of another guys video, I cant find the one I was thinking of.
Though he does seem very unhappy with katana
Yeah I think it was another British guy I was referring too.
This guys videos are ok
Probably Lindybeige
He's far from as well sourced and informative, more of an entertainer
>NOT MACES AND SPEARS
AHAHAHAH FUCKING FAGGOTS
I don't get it, OP.
Where does he ever say or imply that?