Why can't Christians define Christianity?

Why can't Christians define Christianity?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

The deeply held conviction that Jesus Christ is the Son of God who rose from the dead for humanity's redemption.

Are Catholics Christians? The Orthodox? KJV only fundamental southern independent baptists? Womyn bishop Anglicans? Christians seem to not be able to define who is a Christian and who is not, in all these Christian threads there are people going around saying why x denomination are not Christians.

Nietzsche gave the best definition. In essence it's the religion of the powerless trying to guilt-shame the powerful into submition by the power of words, the weak, the strong, the slave, the master, etc. In short, slave-morality: the religion.

Inb4 muh Charlemagne.

Medieval Christianity is a religion of aristocrats, knights and rulers, so it obsviously downplays and reinterprets its original slave-moralistic elements, but Protestantism has brought them back, and PC, SJWism are some of its new, secularized incarnations.

Wow yeah, it's almost like religion is a deeply human concept that reflects different times, peoples and societies or something

If you confess with your mouth and believe in your heart that Jesus is LORD and God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved (Rm 10:9)

>Zoroastrians
>pagans
fuck you christfaggot Zoroaster was 3 times the man Jesus was.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicene_Creed

Just wow

Right Click
Hide Thread

...

t. Farhad
We don't even know when Zoroaster lived let alone what kind of person he was, you delusional twat.

Christianity is the belief in the death, resurrection, and deity of the historical person Jesus of Nazareth.

Christianity is not a monolith, ecumenism is really a big joke and should be discarded.

From my perspective, no, catholics, anglicans, protestants are not christians, the patriarchate of Constantinople I am also starting to see many problems with.

Because it's an external definition. The apostles just called themselves Jews.

That strawman though.

They can.

However, definitions are labeling limitation. So you can only gain so much from one.

One who follows Christ, is Christian. That is pretty much it. You understand the wisdom of His teaching, you are a Christian. You pray to Him and meditate upon Him and His teaching, you are a Christian.

All separation of Christian are because of man-made division, the illusion of exclusivity of the church.

Nietzsche doesn't actually understand Christianity but rather he believed in his own bias opinion which he held so strongly and doesn't go as far into Christianity as he could have

Philosophy and Religion in ancient times are not separate

What about modern "Only-New-Testament" Christians, are they Christians?

Pretty dumb considering the OT has all the cool shit in it.

>are they Christians?
According to who?

The NT is the only one that matters, including the OT into the Bible was a mistake

They follow the same Christ, but Christ mentions if we don't believe in Moses how will we believe in Him.

Big controversy because you have OT/NT Christians and only NT Christians, then OT only Jews and strictly Koran only Muslims all believing in the same God, separated by their lack of love for each other.

According to a popular paradigm of Christianity, but only to that handful.

fail