>I don't think so. If you really are able to get 15% per annum, consistently on a relatively large amount of capital, you'd easily top most hedge funds. Consider it this way: you double your money roughly every 5 years.
>If you ran such a fund for 20 years, it's 16x the original investment; at 30 years, it's 66x the original investment. That puts you into the category of legendary investor.
>easily top most hedge funds
so? why is that a problem?
you have a fear of success ?
hedge funds are run by humans, usually stupid greedy , privilege white boys.
ofc i can do better than that.
also.
if you aren't in this game to make money. get the fuck out my face.
think astronomical return on investments are
"rediculous, or "far fetched", or "unrealistic"
and that i am 14 years old?
no... you are just vastly ignorant.
u dont wanna make money thats fine with me , go fuck urself.
aol.com/article/2012/08/14/coca-cola-stock-share-worth-millions/20299696/
people think saying negative "realistic" shit will make them sound smarter.
but it only proves you dont have any experience or education in the nature of the market.
>legendary investor
who like warren buffet?
if he can do it , why the fuck cant anyone else?
you think he got lucky ?
you have to use prudence when managing your portofolio , and keep an eye on the company's financials,
if you have to pull out of a dividend bearing company after a few years, then do it.
and take the dividends you accrued with you.
im not gonna sit her and detail and out line every little fucking step you need to take in managing a portfolio and achiving astronomical gains, its not nearly as hard as u think, but it will be pretty hard to do with all ur money sitting in some ass holes mutual fund managed by someones nepotist nephew , who drank his way thru college .