>What is this? Ace Attorney Online! Allowing anons to unite to talk, shitpost, perform AA-like trials and have fun overall. Our server is Attorney Online Vidya, come join us!
It WAS in the strawpoll doc, someone removed it, Lupa is aware and he will put it back.
Robert Wright
Lucina is being added now? Why though, she's not even close to AA related. Are we just adding anybody now?
Isaac Jones
First of all, it is impossible to remove things from the strawpoll documents as it is in suggestion mode
Second, she wasn't approved yet; Strawpolls will only be examined and approved/denied on the update day, meaning this strawpoll still has a few days to go
David Adams
>Why though People want her
Colton Rogers
So we can poll for anybody then?
Brandon Young
we will see my friend.
Blake Green
As long it don't look like shit.
Yes.
The strawpoll are here for that.
Thomas Sanchez
>we will see >24 votes in favour 62% already
Chase Bailey
Well. I begin to work on the lipflap then. I think they look nice.
Connor Morris
The only saving grace for this character is that she can team with Barnham
Elijah White
Read the rules, you can poll for anyone as long as it meets some minimum quality conditions that are specified there.
Owen Lopez
That was the idea.
Anthony Morales
>Rise continues to trigger Autists
Anthony Rodriguez
...
Hudson Cruz
>rip never.
Joseph Adams
Are you implying a certain group of people are autists while also implying at the same time that the group of people you identify with are not autists?
Grayson Flores
...
Kevin Cook
So when are we going to add Azama from Fire Emblem Fates?
Juan Edwards
>Never played AA but found this thread by accident >Play a couple games of AO >Have a blast >Makes me want to play AA >Emulate it on my cell phone cause apparently cell phone NDS emulators are a thing >Have blast >tfw playing AO makes me want to play AA and playing AA makes me want to play AO
Please never let this feeling die.
On another note, people are arguying over Rise but I have no idea who that is and I tried googling I dont even know what im looking for.
Levi Taylor
Make a strawpoll and then put it in the suggestion doc
Eli Taylor
it's a waifu
Robert Ward
Rise Kujikawa. Persona 4 character. Girl who people want to use as a witness for whatever reason.
Luis Turner
>people are arguying over Rise but I have no idea who that is A character from Persona 4
Noah Moore
Oh yea her. I see now. This whole thing makes sense now.
Hudson Jenkins
>for whatever reason I know, I hate when people choose a character as a witness.
Henry Ross
> Lucina, Barhnam, Asougi team
You just sold me to her you cheeky bastard.
Anthony Perry
...
Daniel Barnes
...
Xavier Williams
...
Chase Torres
...
Anthony Turner
>all of a sudden we gain 7 no Lupa we really need to move to the new survey.
Charles Wilson
Anyone feel like casing?
Samuel Cook
No, I'd rather spend the rest of the day shitposting in the thread about Lucina and RIse.
Lincoln Thompson
You meant acting like a little passive aggrssive bitch. I just want to case man, why do you bring drama when I just want to play. Fuck outta here with this shitty ass attitude.
Robert Long
Yeah sure, what area?
Angel Clark
Area 1
Ayden Powell
Oh boy.
Daniel Sanchez
Is it a civil case?
Brandon Cook
No I just forgot that area 1 had some special properties. the guys in game told me it didnt matter though so I guess were staying.
Kayden Sanders
Hello
Jose Gray
>55 voters in under one day >implying this is legitimate >implying this is happening Lucina is Rise 2.0 then?
Cooper White
Guys, roll with me on this for a second-
We all know that the sheer length of cases can get to be problematic for older players and intimidating for new ones; as fun as a 6/7/8 hour case can be, it's also damn hard to set up a complete window of time where you can be on AO without a single interruption or conflict. I know that just in this past week, there have been many days I would've loved to case but only had a few hours available to do it.
So, I started thinking about it, and I had this idea- what if we were to dedicate a courtroom to "light" Turnabouts? Basically, cutting out all the fat and doing cases with a light crew of: 1 Defense Attorney 1 Prosecutor 1 Judge 2 Witnesses
that can cycle cases in and out within 2/3 hours? It'd be much more in-line with the size and structure of the original AA cases, and you could just start with the Prosecution presenting the case against the Defendant and with (nearly) all evidence available to start rather than lengthening things up even more with the Detective, CE, and requests. Leave the cases up to the witnesses, and keep the DA and Prosecution rapid-firing back and forth with the Judge to supervise it all.
It'd be a great way to make getting into the game more accessible for new players, giving them a chance to case without having to dedicate an entire 8 hours their first time in. Plus, there's less pressure on if you possibly fuck up a case, because they cycle out faster and a mistake is gone before you know it. And, it gives a nice alternative for when you don't have the full day to devote to AO but still want to get a case going.
Thoughts?
Grayson Richardson
It looked pretty legit until this thread.
But well. People gonna complain.
Jack Jones
I doubt the amount of people actually makes it longer.
Robert Cooper
This has been discussed before.
There already exists a 4 hour doc, modify it to remove the co's and you have your idea.
We never have a case going on in every single room so devoting a room for it is not needed.
Henry Williams
>60 votes now where at least 25 of them came out of nowhere LUPAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Adam Cruz
>30-35 was realistic.
Now it's 60 and like half of the no came in less than 5 minute
Zachary Wright
I think the idea of a devoted room would just be that if I, say, want to do a light case, I know where to go and I know that everybody in that room also want to do a light case. It avoids the probable arguing that you'd get from some people wanting to case at length and others wanting to do light ones.
But, that's just my thoughts. Like you said, it's rare for every room to be taken in the first place, so I doubt you'd run into an issue of a group wanting to do a full case and having no room for it.
Oh, I'm absolutely sure it does. Between an additional testimony, CE, and requests, and the returning Detective bringing new evidence in half-way through a case, plus benches having three times the people on each side, it's part of why cases extend as long as they do.
Brayden Ortiz
It's already have been tested. It doesn't.
CE are why case take long. Witness alway do long testimony with little contradiction hidden behind a wall of question.
Then we have THEORY TIME and MUH DOUBT each time.
Trust me. We already tested and the number of people isn't the problem
Caleb Ward
Well, what about also limiting witnesses in light cases to 8 lines of testimony? Less to dissect and over-analyze, shorter CE's.
And like you said, CE's are why cases take so long. In that case, doing cases without a Detective testimony/CE would shorten them considerably, no?
Christopher Bell
Detectives are basically first witness and lay out the scene. If you get rid of anything it would be the second one.
Evan Ramirez
Could that not be established previously in the case doc/opening statement, though? The problem with having only one witness is that it's either indictment or bust for the defense.
Jayden Scott
Any cases about to start up?
Joseph Baker
if you want more people to complain about the length of case building and muh pre-written, it could.
Ryan Allen
This
People try to hard these days with their CEs
What's wrong with a short CE that has a contradiction in plain sight?
Gabriel Foster
If it's complaining and actually being able to case versus no complaining and not being able to case, I'd take the former any day.
And I don't think it's too "pre-written" to just have a description of the crime scene written in the doc instead of written as the Detective describes it. Hell, most cases I've done recently have had maps and explanations just like that already, reducing the detective to just repeating what the doc and evidence already says.
It becomes the same thing, minus the steps of bringing out a player, having them say it themselves, then going through CE and requests. You end up with a description of the scene that witnesses will use in their testimonies either way.
Brandon Martin
...
Caleb Lee
Updated Terry breakdown. Thoughts?
Elijah Hall
Can we make these a thing?
Camden Morales
No because the emotes of 2d Ryu are like only four
Isaac Gray
Case in area one starting up, and no it's not a civil case. Needs supports and a judge
Michael Thompson
imgur.com/a/QQLmS Eh, there's like 10 if you count with and without the defenseband. Although it doesn't have the preanims.
If only he had a pointing animation. Then he'll be okay.
Jordan Green
Why not leave the background transparent and then the black screen?
Hunter Brown
Streaming in Area 1
twitch tv/lawfuldickish
Justin Diaz
You mean like this?
Benjamin Powell
i think he mean No courtroom Background
Xavier Jones
Hey guy fixing Wellingtons ini, how's the progress coming? Thanks for doing this shit
Austin Young
Well I need to know what's wrong with it exactly. I was told he's just completely missing his breakdown?
Joshua Hill
>Neil isn't on the iniswap char.ini ONE JOB
Sebastian Walker
>2 witnesses
Too much of cases nowadays is the prosecution stonewalling and demanding verdict after one witness instead of moving on, this area would need a rule preventing that shit from prolonging the case.
Luis Williams
Oh, right. It's transparent in the final gif, I only added the courtroom background so you have a better idea of what it looks like ingame.
Luis Sullivan
>demanding verdict after one witness instead of moving on You mean the way it's supposed to be?
Luis Turner
Except guiltyfags have their own definition of what "reasonable doubt" is and will deadlock the trial unless their extremely narrow definition is met.
See: that fucking Gundam trial.
Sebastian Moore
Except it's not up to the prosecution to choose when the verdict should be. The judge decides when and if the next witness comes up. And if the Judge is feeling like a guiltyfag then you just got bad luck.
Andrew Torres
Manfred tells Wright to find a contradiction in the first testimony of 1-4 or he's going to be held in contempt of court and a guilty verdict delivered.
We aren't even at that level yet.
Wyatt Diaz
Oh okay my bad then.
Lincoln Parker
Yeah, the breakdown is in his folder but it's split up into two animations
Bentley Price
Oh I see, no emote in the ini file is using (b)break.
This should be an easy fix
Dylan Harris
In that particular instance, multiple contradictions had been pointed out, including one completely changing the time of the crime to a point the primary evidence linking the defendant to the scene was no longer valid.
Instead it was 2 hours of shitposting instead of bringing up the next witness to refute the discrepancy.
Daniel Clark
Actually what the fug. (b)break looks like the end of the breakdown, but (b) is the talking animations while (a) is the idle animation. They should have been reversed.
Mason Howard
What you are saying is absolutely unacceptable but completely what the prosecution is supposed to do. The issue here is the judge.
Lucas Reyes
Yeah, it seems like judges nowadays seem more interested in just providing bantz instead of actually trying to direct a case.
For one, I can't believe that the judge didn't step in for the case a few days back that had two 40+ line testimonies
Andrew Collins
Any areas ((case?))ing?
William James
>detective presents all the evidence and facts instead of a testimony >everybody understands everything >takes less than 30 minutes for detective + requests Why don't we do this more often?
Gabriel Thomas
area 1 is casing
Easton Perez
I notice that judges are willing to give the defense a billion second chances for no real reason more than what you guys are talking about
when did this trend of detectives just being witnesses start anyway
Lincoln Turner
You mean with Vasquez and Ron? Fortunately it was just shitposting and was completely skipped.
Ayden Foster
>i got screencapped Nice.
Aiden Allen
>peanut gallery shouting at the DA about contradictions during detective
Detective shouldn't even have them, they're supposed to establish the scene. The only thing resembling a contradiction should be an overlooked aspect of the evidence, which is just request material anyway.
Jason Ward
There were no contradictions. Everything Thundercock said was a fact about the case as we know it.