Assuming they're both in the same economic position, who has more of an advantage in life?

Assuming they're both in the same economic position, who has more of an advantage in life?
The 11/10 dime piece broad with average intelligence OR
An unattractive manlet with a rare genuis mind?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CPznMbNcfO8
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Top shelf pussy is going to get a better average result.

Difficult to answer, the girl may never know rejection until she's well into her 20's by which point she lacks the discipline or the drive to actually accomplish anything.

She settles down with a guy who earns okay money, drives a low-level-luxury car and after the second child start regretting every decision she's ever made in her life because she took the easy route.

The 'manlet' (how manlet are we talking? Like Prince?) may not be taken seriously, and may never develop the confidence to believe in his own genius... but if he does then the sky is the limit.

I don't get why you guys put so much value in to height. All asians are manlets and they dominate STEM as well as finance now. I get what means with the confidence thing though.

I reckon ugly manlet has a better chance. Reason being, hot women burn out quite fast. I know 9/10 girls that looked like shit by the time they were 19 because they took to many drugs and it ruined their body and face. So now they are a 5/10 used up whore with no skills and wonders why no boys want her anymore.

tldr; alot of hot women end up without skills so ugly manlet has better odds

Women can parlay their looks into getting a man to pay for them. The more beautiful the woman is, the higher the status of man she can get if she wants. That's how it works.

She can capitalize on her looks while young and fertile, get a man to buy her, churn out a few kids, then divorce the guy and get extortion money called """child support""" and maybe even some more extortion money called "alimony" from him for decades, whereas she is required to do nothing for him anymore.

At that point it doesn't matter if she loses her sex appeal or not: she's set for life.

Sure, women throw away that advantage all too often in favor of getting fucked and chucked until their late 30's, but they have the advantage nonetheless. The fact that they waste it is immaterial.

The ugly genius manlet must work. He must still make something of himself and prove himself. He can't coast on his eggs and uterus because he doesn't have any. He's disposable, just like his sperm.

As for height, people *usually* treat smaller people with a casual disregard at best, or disgust and violence at worst. It's basic primal shit. They are not interpreted as a threat. Because they are not interpreted as a threat, it follows that there is less reason to treat them respectfully.

This is our closest relative. Remember that.

youtube.com/watch?v=CPznMbNcfO8

The man still has to work to secure his DNA's future.

/thread

It doesnt matter how hot she is if she doesnt know how to use it.

He may be unattractive, but he doesnt need to be attractive to become a CEO/millionaire. He can then appeal to 11/10's using creativity and smarts.

>he doesnt need to be attractive to become a CEO/millionaire

well, most CEO's are much taller than average.

Face it, we perceive people differently because of how they look. A result of this is that sometimes people can not maximize their potential due to a lack of social proof rooted in their appearance, and by "appearance" I mean immutable genetic traits, not just shit like being fat or unkempt

why would a man work to secure his DNA's future?

The "dime piece" will be a dime between the ages of 18 and 27. She'll be beddable for another decade. If she's not married by then, she's fucked.

The genius will be a genius from 18 (age he can legally fuck around with businesses) to maybe 50, and after that'll he'll still be razor sharp till at least 75, and who knows how far medical science will have advanced by that point. David Rockefeller is already pretty much immortal.

Medical science could bring the dime's looks back, but she needs to bag a rich husband to ensure this. The genius on the other hand is guaranteed to make money, so long as he's non-autistic enough to understand that his life is at stake.

Obviously it comes down to which one of them applies their gifts. The woman can become an instagram girl and makes hundreds of thousands per year shilling products, possibly even become a model or high class escort.

The rare genius can do a maths phd and earn big money in finance. both take work

>rare genius going into finance

what a waste.

>muh eggs are worth something
lmfao
to who?
menopausal women who want kids ?

theres no shortage of bitches.
and the younger the better.
entirely replaceable if looks are the only thing they bring to the table.

this thread isn't about the future of either party's dna lol.. its about advantage and quality
of that parties life.
this isn't fuckin mad max, fury road.

who the fuck on this planet genuinley cares about the "future of their dna"?

most ppl are so selfish they hardly give a fuck about their kids much less their extended progeny .

All life is about reproduction. Like pick up a science book nigger.

So you have 2 goals: (1) have offspring (2) Provide those offspring with the most resources possible. And ultimately have more power than other humans for generations, etc...

So in OP's example that guy still has to work, to get money/power, then he can have all the pussy he wants. But the woman just has to make her pussy available to the most powerful man she can come across.

So. the man still has to work.

lol.so your telling me you're entire life is all about reproduction?
then why don't you have any kids?

i have read the selfish gene dickface.

you're talking about low evolved animal humans who are a slave to there genes.

being a slave to your genes doesn't benefit your life in the slightest.

the woman has 2 work 2

to find the powerful man.

men have alot of ways 2 trick stupid women looking for an "alpha"

with money, or muscles, or social tricks.

but those women who are easily tricked aren't alpha females.

if a woman wants 2 find the true alpha male, she has 2 know what is really important, and ill give u a clue. its not someone who spends excessive money or has steroided muscles.

it actually nowadays is the ability of Nature/over nurture, 2 pass on a set of viable lasting survival and life principles. ie : a very special intelligence set.

ITT: kissless virgins

>The 11/10 dime piece broad with average intelligence OR
>An unattractive manlet with a rare genuis mind?
Depends on how well they both play their cards.
The 11/10 might be rational enough to realize her position and pull the same stuff that Ivanka Trump did, while the rare genius might not give any fucks about hedonism at all and just stays NEET and does all his research privately at home without ever publishing and giving a rats ass about the economic applicability if his results.

>Ivanka Trump
I meant Ivana

best thing is at that age , most women don't have the wisdom to know that and dont prepare for the decline.