Why did the blacks have a succesful uprising in Haiti but not in English held colonies?

> What were Anglos secret tactics to keep 'em in check?
whipping posts, humiliation, setting home slaves against plantation hands, etc.

Oh I didn't know about this 10keys

Are killings in a slave revolt ever justified?

Yeah i'd say so

To be dehumanized and made a literal slave, doing anything to reestablish your humanity is understandable

>There is only one concept of slave

and slaving in a caribbean sugar plantation wasn´t the best one

Don't worry, you're not alone. The majority of posters here make sweeping statements without even a cursory glance at wikipedia.

the tree of liberty gotta be litterd with the blood of freemen

[spoiler]nah[/spoiler]

Are there any logical ways you can become a free man and not a second class citizen or worse (and back to slave even) without them?
That's sort of the kicker.

>Why didn't even one black get an idea to rebel?

Faggot have you ever read a book?

French revolution happened

Much smaller part of the population, plus the plantations were much further from each one than in Haiti.

>In the United States during the same period they were 15% of the population

More like 20%.

>What were Anglos secret tactics to keep 'em in check?

Never being at war with the entire civilized world
Britain was pretty cowardly and thus always on the most numerous side in wars, so they never had to divert so much manpower in vital combats that slaves overseas could successfully revolt without being really taken care of

If they win.

What about the killing of innocents?

t. Pierre du Fromage

Why are we acting as if "black" is synonymous with "slave"? As I understand it large scale slavery was mainly for America and the west indies, not so much for the other English colonies. The Zulu war was not a slave revolt

Who said it was?

>Wow they murdered the only good people and destroyed all the infrastructure and turned Haiti into the world power it is today!