Quid Est Veritas

What is Truth, Veeky Forums? Is it universal? Is it relative? Can we know it?

Define truth.

There are many types of "truth". A mathematical proof is "true", and so is a fact, but they're not at all the same kind of thing. "Truth" is a bucket term like "religion" or "literature", it covers a wide range of concepts that are only slightly related, and seeking to consolidate them all in one concept is a mistake.

>user asks what truth is
>gets response asking what truth is
What a great thread.

why is roman hitler interrogating jesus?

Read the Bible, or even just google the thread title

That's not Jesus, that's Greek Hitler. The painting depicts on of the earliest known time-travel SNAFU's.

its probably pontius pilate if thats jesus but still why does he look like hitler

How else are we supposed to answer? Yes/no?

>What is Truth, Veeky Forums?
Truth is no object and cannot be defined

>Is it universal?
Universality is a man made concept and cannot be applied to truth

>Can we know it?
Human knowledge is too limited to comprehend truth; it can only be experienced

I forgot
>Is it relative?
Relativity requires two or more objects and as said truth is not an object, therefore truth is not relative; it simply is

>What then is truth? A movable host of metaphors, metonymies, and; anthropomorphisms: in short, a sum of human relations which have been poetically and rhetorically intensified, transferred, and embellished, and which, after long usage, seem to a people to be fixed, canonical, and binding. Truths are illusions which we have forgotten are illusions- they are metaphors that have become worn out and have been drained of sensuous force, coins which have lost their embossing and are now considered as metal and no longer as coins.

There's no such thing as truth, and if there is it would be utterly ineffable. Human experience is inherently and eminently subjective, so how could so many subjectivities ever possibly recognize and then be able to transmit an "objective" truth that is received correctly and "objectively"? There are things we can more or less agree on, but Truth is metaphysically equivalent to believing in a soul or spirit behind all things

>There's no such thing as truth
And only Sith deal in absolutes.

Subjective consciousness. We scan the world, whatever it is, (and which we are part of) for the patterns which make the truth.

JPWW

>what is Greek as a common tongue

Also what's the Hebrew translate out to? The part prior to Quid Est Veritas?

Est vir qui adest

But le jesus spoke every lanugage

>I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel. It is not right to take the children's bread and throw it to the dogs.

Also it's unrealistic Pilate would ask a question in Latin in the first place. Both because as you said (outside of government and military functions) Greek was the common tongue of the educated east, and because Jesus was at best a semi-literate who could only speak Aramaic, and maybe knew some Hebrew as well.

We only have only have one instance where Jesus may demonstrate the ability to write (John 8:6-8). Which even then is pushing it not only because it comes from the least historically reliable gospel, but because the Pharisees don't react to whatever he "wrote" in the dirt, and only react to what he says to them. So it's possible he may've merely been drawing something, but even then whatever was drawn didn't affect the course of conversation.

>text is taken from His encounter with the Canaanite woman
Then why is that used for that picture? It makes no sense there!

I don't think Pilate really spoke Latin there instead doing Greek assuming it would be a common language Jesus might know or at the very least he'd know Aramaic for his job as "Governor of Judea" and Quid Est Veritas is just how the Gospel writer recorded it. Like if a Korean translated the Assassins Creed Revalations novelization and we were discussing a scene between the Italian Ezio and the Turkish Yusuf. It might be written in Korean, but neither of the characters are speaking Korean.