ITT: Hondafags explain why this is considered a super even though a cobalt ss/tc beat the shit out of it around Laguna seca
ITT: Hondafags explain why this is considered a super even though a cobalt ss/tc beat the shit out of it around Laguna...
Other urls found in this thread:
fastestlaps.com
twitter.com
Musclefags plz explain why mussel cars have are considered so mussel when a cobalt ss/tc beats the shit out of them in everything?
the cobalt is a piece of shit that will turn off while driving at highway speeds, crashing and killing you in the process, it doesnt matter if its fast, it's a piece of shit and you are a cuck for thinking its worth the talk
LOL... how fast a car goes around Laguna is the only metric you use to compare them. Fuck off Sheldon Cooper
they are not fast. and they are not comfortable.
a total poser car to be honest.
and yes, I've driven one.
Because it had a super car price tag and production numbers, never mind it was slower than commuter sedans
> na v6
> supercar
Top kek
ITT Hondafags explain why this is a supercar when a E36 M3 was faster for half the price new and 1/4th of the price used
They were never considered super cars when they were sold.
>Because it had a super car price tag
No it didn't Not even adjusted for inflation. They made a lot of them too.
Because it came out before the Cobalt did, and you dont get to take back cars original titles.
the nsx is considered a supercar?
by who?