ITT: Hondafags explain why this is considered a super even though a cobalt ss/tc beat the shit out of it around Laguna...

ITT: Hondafags explain why this is considered a super even though a cobalt ss/tc beat the shit out of it around Laguna seca

Other urls found in this thread:

fastestlaps.com/tests/sgizlei75shh
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Musclefags plz explain why mussel cars have are considered so mussel when a cobalt ss/tc beats the shit out of them in everything?

the cobalt is a piece of shit that will turn off while driving at highway speeds, crashing and killing you in the process, it doesnt matter if its fast, it's a piece of shit and you are a cuck for thinking its worth the talk

LOL... how fast a car goes around Laguna is the only metric you use to compare them. Fuck off Sheldon Cooper

they are not fast. and they are not comfortable.

a total poser car to be honest.

and yes, I've driven one.

Because it had a super car price tag and production numbers, never mind it was slower than commuter sedans
> na v6
> supercar
Top kek

ITT Hondafags explain why this is a supercar when a E36 M3 was faster for half the price new and 1/4th of the price used

They were never considered super cars when they were sold.
>Because it had a super car price tag
No it didn't Not even adjusted for inflation. They made a lot of them too.

Because it came out before the Cobalt did, and you dont get to take back cars original titles.

the nsx is considered a supercar?
by who?

Just look at it ffs.

Retards who don't realize that the first gen was classed as a 'sports car' and that the second gen (what we're getting with the 2016 model) is classed as a 'super car'.

By reaching weebs.

>this same autist

Who gives a fuck, just like what you like and stop caring about irrelevant lap times.

>2jz swap
>600whp achieved
>supercar

Also
>Japanese speed restriction

stay mad the cobalt is a piece of shit

it's another "europoor is mad as fuck the NSZ was better than the ferraris of its day" post

go get cucked by ahmed

>2JZ swap

you have to be 18 to post here kid

...

most overrated shit, plastic and bland

0 soul

>not comfortable
The fuck?
They are max comfy. Are you like 300lbs and couldn't fit in the seat?

Except it wasn't.
Anyway, don't you find ironic you get cucked into buying anything that isn't made in your own continent? :D

>proof it was
>n-no it's not true!!
kek, tripcuck on denial

> don't you find ironic you get cucked into buying anything that isn't made in your own continent? :D
nope, is cuckoldry the first thing you think of when talking aboput cars, you have issues

> a 260-hp car is faster than a 15 years-older sports car

WOW!

If you think a puny NSX is a match for a F40 you have serious mental issues.

>nope, is cuckoldry the first thing you think of when talking aboput cars, you have issues
Strange you were the first to mention it :^)

>fact that the NSX can match it with no issues
>n-nooo its not truee!!!
stay in denial, tripcuck

>Strange you were the first to mention it :^)
whats the problem is talking about cuckoldry making you feel insecure?

It's 1991. You can get a 3,010-lb, mid-engined sports car with a 270-horsepower 3.0-liter V6 for $60,000 (about $106k in 2016 dollars). Tell me that's not a good value.

Nurburgring times
>Ferrari F40
7:18.70

>Honda NSX-R NA2
7:56.73

Both from flying starts.
Can you please shut up now bby?

>ferrari
>being able to finish a lap around the nurburgring without catching up flames

top kek
seethe NSX lapped tsukuba faster than the f40

No one cares about your shitty tsukaba meme track.

Actually, plenty of people paid $60k in 2014 for a mid-engined sports car with a 2.7-liter 6-cylinder making 275 hp. Considering 13 years of technological advancements, the old NSX doesn't sound too bad at all.

>this assmad

Forgot the image. Also, checked.

Your bait is almost as a stale as your mommy's cunt.
And by the way, the F40 does Tsukuba in 1:03.95, while the NSX-R does it in 1:05.41.

I'm sure your little pink butthole must be absolutely burning from all that Golf Clubsport destroying the Honda flying saucer stuff, but there's no need to go full retard about a worthless track who nobody uses as a complete benchmark, apart from some japs who don't have access to anything better :)

>13 years
M8

>NSX does it in 1:05
nope
see 1:03, faster than the f40

stay analmad

>civic
pic related

Also, just because you love jap shows so much...

Best Motoring oval

>F40
1:29.21

>NSX-R NA2 (a 15 year newer car)
1:41.57

kek

>the car literally needs draft in order to do a faster lap
Suffice to say, it's not a verified time. And even then, it doesn't hold a candle to the F40 in a real track where it gets btfo by almost a minute.

>mfw my Punto has more torks than a NSX
literally dying here

>oval
tip top kek

>draft
lolwat

>F40 in a real track
a ferrari can't finish a lap around the nurburgring without catching up in flames
just see
fastestlaps.com/tests/sgizlei75shh
>This laptime is a calculated estimate - not a test result.
>Real test results may differ!

KEK! literally can't lap the nurburgring

probably caught up flames after a minute

>mfw you drive a shitbox punto yuropoor shitbox
KEK! literally dying here

I don't consider it a super car, but I've been planning an nsx build, 400hp NA, wider tires, kW v3, and weight reduction. Is there a reason why I should think otherwise?

Sure it was because it caught fire, kek.
After all having twice the power and still managing to be lighter than a NSX wouldn't make it faster at all.


>>mfw you drive a shitbox punto yuropoor shitbox
>mfw you drive a torqueless ricebox
How does it feel downshifting to 1st everytime you want to pass a bicycle?

because supercar depends as much on price as it does on performance

Nevermind the shitposter the F40 and nsx isn't really in the same class

The F40 went for nearly $400k while the nsx type r went for $80k

To be fair to the original NSX, Japan up until recently had a 276hp restriction, and compared to a 63hp Kei car or something that half of them drive, it would feel like a rocket ship.

see >This laptime is a calculated estimate - not a test result.
>Real test results may differ!

>mfw this europoor is bragging about a fucking laptime set in a fukcing videogame
>mfw the f40 NEVER EVER lapped the nurburgring because ferrari knew it would catch up in flames
>mfw the f40 is slower than the NSX-R first gen around tsukuba

KEK!
E
K
!

tripcuck on suicide watch

the c5z corvette makes more power and is lighter yet its also slower than the NSX-R, stay asshurt

>mfw you drive a torqueless ricebox
i drive a shebby v8 though

>i drive a shebby v8 though
Then you're not the one to go on about cars catching flames.

jokes on you, i am a ford fanboy

remember the 4 victories at lemans back at the 60's bby

>remember the 4 victories at lemans back at the 60's bby
So?

FoMoCo>FCA

Ferrari has 9 wins, Alfa has 4 wins... Your point being?

>"hurr durr we ferrari we da best at lemans"
>gets cucked by ford 4 times in a row
>"i dont want to play anymore ;_;"

KEK

can't make it up

>what is inflation
a base cayman is not worth100k, just as the NSX was always poor value

/thread

My bad, 23.

No one said a base Cayman was worth $100k. The NSX is not a bad value, either. If you "inflate" horsepower the way the dollar has inflated, it's not unreasonable to say a 270-hp MR 3000-lb sports car for $60k in 1991 was a good deal.

I'm sure I can put a top fuel engine in a civic somehow. More power, probably lighter
doesn't mean it will work

It's a supercar because Gordon Murray says so.

a genuine 400hp NA from 3.0 or 3.2 litres would mean horrific reliability and driveability.

Well I was thinking with a 3.5 stroker, and itbs

you are clueless

its always been considered a sports car. pretty sure it cost the same as an RX7 back in the day.

It actually cost twice as much

$70-90k.

FD RX-7 and E36 M3 was $35-40k when they were new

And the M3 was better than the NSX at least...