How will cars look like in 30 years?

>resources are finite
>resources are the object
>resources are not objects classified by their utility
this is the most cucked mentality. there is no such thing as limited resources. to say so is to say that technology cannot develop beyond its current state.

Literally thought someone had taken a picture and squashed the aspect ratio.

>6th mass extinction right now
>entirely anthropogenic
>majority of species on Earth will be extinct in the next 100 years
>REV UP THEM ENGINES AND ROLL SOME COAL YEEHAW
>DRILL BABY DRILL
>FARM THEM SHITTY FARMS AND BURN SOME FORESTS, NIGGERS, Y'ALL ON YOUR OWN

Fucking pandas deserve to die, am I right or what? I fucking love destabilized environments.

Sorry to see that you've drank the Kool-Aid. Too bad.

>extinction
>hasnt been seen for 50 years
>a lot of taxonomists/zoologists got their degrees making up species that never existed
>identifying duplicates because of slight variations in phenotypes
>NEW SPECIES
>species not seen in 50 years
>must have gone extinct
>because....
>POLLUTION
pic related. peppered moth.

...

how cute, it's disguised as a real car

you could say the same about the person in that car

What kills me, is the rim covers cover up the bicycle spokes. Like why.
Why

>majority of species on Earth will be extinct in the next 100 years
A. No they won't. Only the fags that are used to the cold weather
B.Stopping deforestation is literally the cure to global warming
C. Global warming will never be solved, imagine how many scientists will be out of a job, how much the gubmint will lose in taxes, and how many moms will lose one of their bitch points. Global warming is here to stay. just like cancer. There are so many thousands of jobs associated to treating cancer. Whoever finds the cure for it better find a bunker to hide in.

Y
E
S W E D E N

...

pls no

Or we could just biologically reengineer those extinct species or help them evolve and adapt to the environment as we change it, except moral conservative types are holding back genetic science.

>Or we could just biologically reengineer those extinct species
Too much work for literally no payoff.
They would only exist for posterity.
>help them evolve and adapt to the environment as we change it
Unfortunately evolution takes longer than the climate is changing.
>except moral conservative types are holding back genetic science.

We care about the fact that you need to kill a human to further your science.

And to add, humans are a product of nature, so what we do can be considered natural. While some species are dying, others are flourishing.

ouch

this is what people thought cars of the future would look like ten years ago. When the price of gas was going up without stopping and smartcars were getting popular.

Surprise surprise, we have gotten no closer to that future and are in fact moving away from it. Bigger cars are being made to be more fuel efficient, and the only people that are probably complaining are city dwellers who have are turning towards more high-tech cycles like the one in .

Whatever the cars of the future end up actually being like, I'm sure you all will hate it because:

>you won't be able to afford it
>it won't look good to you, and
>it won't be an R32 GTR, Civic EG Hatch or a Hachiroku (but I bet you fags will warm up to toyobarus and practically worship them in 20 years).

>consumer driven car designs
>any year

THIS WAS SUPPOSE TO BE THE FUTURE REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

nothing wrong with human life ending

its shit

I'm really disappointed in you guys. This should've been a modern car design thread.

>reddit memes

We won't have cars in 30 years. It'll all be public transport i.e. cuckmobiles.

This is why I detest environmental politics. I'm from the Pacific Northwest, and my family is involved in fishing and forestry, and has been for generations. It irritates me that in the current political climate, there is very little room for environmental stewardship and resource management.

Most modern environmental regulation isn't going to work, because it's not supposed to. It's just a power grab by the state and federal governments, and when it "fails" they'll use that as a pretext to grab more power. Major industry players are mostly OK with it, because it puts the squeeze on smaller competitors first. The Sierra Club/Greenpeace types don't want us to exploit our natural resources at all, because they want the entire region to be a nature preserve. The obvious side effect of this nonsense is that we import the natural resources we need from countries that don't care about the environment at all, like Brazil or Burma. With that said, we do need legislation that ensures that common goods, such as fisheries and forests and fresh water, are exploited responsibly and in such a way that they will be around for future generations. When you look at things like American Bison, or Passenger Pigeons, or the forests of Ireland, most of the resources that have been totally destroyed have been renewable ones. There needs to be a mechanism in place to ensure that renewable resources renew.

The focus on CO2 emissions is completely useless except as a power grab, and allows people to ignore more serious issues like a comprehensive reform of the Colorado River water rights.

Everything in capitalism is consumer driven you retard

How else would businesses make money?

maybe in 1st world cuckholes

you are a dumb nigger

3rd world cucks won't have any car makers to buy from lmao

Mexico is like the number one producer of cars now, by volume.

>there are no used cars in the 3rd world
stop being fucking stupid

Producer, but there aren't Mexican manufaturers

Used cars will eventually run out of parts

>Used cars will eventually run out of parts
and?
several replacememnt parts are already made all over the world

you can buy a lot of parts for american cars from china, brazil and india

>cars
>in 30 years

i wouldnt be surprised if they were taxed to death and almost impossible to own a personal one let alone one being able to be driven by a person.

shits going to be like uber or lift.

that is, if all out war hasn't broken out and fucked the american infrastructure more than it already is

Heh. That's cute. Someone actually believes the human species will still be around in 30 years.

can we at lest agree that a car is no good when stuck in a traffic jam ?
I really do think commuters are killing the car though over use
rather than as the luxury personal transport used to be

survived the cold war mate

what do you see killing the human race in 3 decades

like this

...

I'm so anxious about the future because of depleting crude oil resources. There are believable papers on depletion which predict drops as early as 2020 and no later than 2040, what that means for global economy is chaos. I fear that I'll be driving some fucking battery or methane powered plastic bottle by the time I have enough money for a decent car, I fucking despise the thought of it. Please tell me I'm paranoid and wrong

Listen to this to get you in the mood
youtube.com/watch?v=rcInO7drL6M

>muh peak oil
People were saying the same shit in the 70s. It's all hogwash.

Too many windows to be a car from 30 years in the future