Which one would you pick?

The Silverado, because I'm not a fucking faggot like you losers.

BTFO'D

>Fix
>Ot
>Rgain
>Dony

There's likely a good reason for this: companies have their own databases on what sort of collisions occur in the real world. Maybe ford brought them a one-off prototype for testing along with a cash-filled suitcase.

Ford literally can't compete

I like Toyotas. Something about Ford interiors depresses me.

Neither. I'm not a cuck that commutes to his office job in a xbawks hueg truck.

>Porsche
>worst model: 911
>best model: Cayman

Based

How is it based?

Boat rickshaw powered by small children.

Silverado > government motors

911 needs to die off so the Cayman can finally shine. It's good so see that people are starting to realize that the 911 isn't all that great

youtube.com/watch?v=22zIAXvzphk

Neither.

>shit vs shit

This.

Chevy high country

>buying a fullsize truck that isn't a Ford or GM
>ever

Toyota knows how to make a good midsize, but that's it.

that small overlap test is a real bitch

Its just twerking

Tundra

Ford, not even because of reliability or anything. The newest Tundras look oddly proportioned and just shitty in general, and I am usually willing to look past a vehicles looks.

Just dont crash...

I'll never drive anything less than 8 cylinders. Even if it means going Toyota.

Toyota tacoma
Isis recommend car of the years.

WTF are you on?

>doesn't know about physics

The truth.
They neuter the Cayman so it cannot compete with the 911, even though the Cayman has a better layout.

>he hasn't driven either car at speed

Neither, I'd just buy an old Dakota because it's what I need.

Even with that I'd take a Cayman over a 911 unless the latter is a turbo. The Cayman doesn't have useless back seats, an obnoxious 7MT (6 gears is more than enough) and has a proper MR layout instead of the RR meme.

>Audi

I dont believe it.

Cayman has the better layout.

I dunno man.

The fact that you need to drop the engine to do anything is kind of a big turn off.

f150

Would get the Fjord, but I'd take a Sierra over the F150 any day

Are you me, OP? I've been debating between the two for several months now. I want one of them to be my next ride, just not sure which one.

Toyota for the reliability. F150 for the features. Just not sure...

>Ford
>Ford
>Ford is so good
>Ford
>Muh ford
>Oh and everything else sucks lol
>ford

I bet he's sitting on a suitcase full of money with a blue oval on it.

Tundra. Resale value it's crazy good and it's extremely reliable.

Tundra; made in Texas, reliable, and isn't made out of Aluminum. But id really rather a 78 Bronco or K5.

How do you tow 10,000lbs and navigate 3' snow drifts?

Diesel? Ford. Otherwise I'd rather own a Tundra if I had to pick.

The tundra is outdated and if you wait 1-2 years a new one will be coming out.

The F-150 has some questionable QC and some breakable parts, though a great engine.

I'd say get a Tacoma

I picked the pic related. Either way the truck will last me 300k, the Tundra would last longer but average 6 or 7 less mpg.

The Tundras I test drove were coming in at 14 or so. The 150 I got is averaging 19 city / 25 hwy.

Tundra has more greater reliability but worse gas mileage, personally I found them too bulbous for my taste. F150 gets better gas mileage and is less reliable. Either way is fine just preference.

My 150 would have cost me 15k more as a Tundra.

seriously you guys? I'll be over here enjoying my god tier coil suspension system

Only vehicle: Tundra

Additional vehicle: F-150

Both would be standard cab as God and John Moses Browning intended.

...

Le angry ute returns!

>Have never Used their truck for actual work

Cool your jets grandpa

You drive 8 cylinders?

the toyota looks more pleasing. the Ford looks like it literally stepped out of one of those modern car design hate threads. it literally looks shopped to be stretched vertically

someone post the gif

The F-150 looks like something a wealthy spic living in a white neighborhood would drive.

This
Tundras are shit at cargo/towing