The BMW M-Series killer??

Since when Veeky Forums??

Other urls found in this thread:

nurburgringlaptimes.com/lap-times-top-100/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

It's not hard to kill a BMW. It breaks down so often.

But they're supposed to be the ultimate driving machine tho...

/thread

and alfas don't?

>BMW is unreliable
>But Alfa is perfect, they're more solid than a Hilux

Never said that

>It's not hard to kill a BMW

When a Mustang with ancient suspension technology went toe to toe with an M3 in 2011 i think its be established that if your performance goal is to "kill" an M series you should set your goals higher as your performance will be "average" instead of ground-breaking. (assuming you want to be the ULTIMATE driving machine and not the slightly above or below average one)

>It's not hard to kill a BMW
Hell a corolla can do that

stop shilling for your italian garbage mario

The E92 M3 was introduced in 2007 and the Mustang GT in 2011
Both cars had simillar power to weight ratios so they really were quite close
The mustang was still slower in every aspect though
2 years later the new M3 was released and it walked every other performance sedan, it has always been the same - every time other auto makers are starting to catch up with the current M3 BMW releases a new model or a competition package which sets the new benchmark

Sure, but you implied Alfa's are reliable and will kill BMW

>implying

I have a 2009 M3 with 140,000 miles, only issues so far being:

>oil pan cracked
>passenger airbag broke
>seatbelt sensors failed
>windshield wiper is about to break, going to replace soon

Not bad desu, I don't really consider that unreliable.

TOP KEK

>The mustang was still slower in every aspect...

OP have you ever driven a modern bmw?

Compared, a new Audi A4, which is a car that has nothing to do with the driving pleasure, has a better steering and feedback.

Shitty steering, shitty suspension and now they're selling 3 cylinder diesels and petrol also MPVs.

Nobody has to kill Bmw...Bmw has already killed itself.

BMW still has a lot of work to do to catch up to Alfa in the ring, tho.

Daily reminder that every Giulia has been engineered starting from the Quadrifoglio as base

>The Quadrifoglio is not a tuned version of the base model like every competitors

Step up to Alfa Romeo's level, pleb tier "premium" brands.

How much of an autist do you have to be to believe/think the usual BMW client will ever even think about a shitty Alfa?

lel

Theres only one thing this will kill. Alfa itself.

>BMW client
Lol shut up satan

Looks like shit.

Want the evil looking Alfa back.

>being this retarded and ignorant

In the last years many Alfa's customers migrated to Bmw because they were not offering a comparable product, RWD and focused on the driving pleasure.

Now that Alfa Romeo has come back the ex Alfisti will go back to their mother Alfa Romeo master race.

It's the circle of auto makers, Alfa Romeo is the undisputed queen.

>tuning up a base model is somehow worse than de-tuning a top model

they're both shit

>looks like shit

Where? Also they're posting everytime that ugly ass rendered image...

Try with something taken in real life like pic related.

>carbon fiber drive shaft standard with every trim and engine
>most light car over competitors

Stay mad

I forgot the ad hoc suspension and Brembo brakes.

>he does it for free

top kek you cuck

Yea, I remember the 90s... Back when the power of a mustang v6 was 143 hp and the corolla's I4 was 130. I miss when Toyota made good cars...

>If there's a german or american model involved, then it's not a shill thread
>if it's Alfa Romeo then here we go

Ignore BMW fangirls posts, don't reply to BMW fangirls posts.

>The dick goes in all fields

...

The E92 M3 is 0.4 seconds faster at 0-100 kph and is faster on tracks
A lot of work? Considering the Alfa lap time was set by a stripped test mule and running on street illegal racing slicks driven by a professional and the M3 lap time was set by a journalist on street tyres, i wouldn't say "a lot of work"
Also there isn't even any proof for the Giulias lap time, no video or anything.

>no proof for the giulia lap time

nurburgringlaptimes.com/lap-times-top-100/

>46

That's a claimed lap time
There is no proof to back the claim up

There are other claimed records (many) without video proof like the one from the previous fastest sedan obtained by the Porsche Panamera Turbo S and nobody is crying about that.

Is that 7:39 lap time in the official nurburgring lap times chart? Yes.

/thread

>/threading yourself
literally kill yourself

Go be mad elsewhere

>the mustang was slower
Not anymore. KEK!

how is that any different from just posting /thread without any other text?

>implying you can have threads about anything that isn't jap shitboxes

So you actually start these threads everyday to shill for a car you will never be able to afford and on top of that you do it for free. You are Veeky Forums's top cuck desu senpai

He is the OP you tard

Saying it doesn't mean that it necessarily is true.

Fuck off now.

>FUCK OUT OF MY SHILL THREAD REEEEEEEEEE

ok

Everyone and their mother is saying the Giulia is faster and handles better than the M3/M4.
It's a car developed by Ferrari engineers, what'd you expect?

That might be my favorite photo ever.

When is alfa going to bring in some diffrent grills for the Giulia? I want the ones on the right, the horizontal chrome on my base model. blue exterior brown and wood inside.