/wtg/ War Thunder General

NEVER EVER-Edition 2.0

Changelog of the things the fucked up most recently:
warthunder.com/en/game/changelog/current/600/

>Official Site:
warthunder.com/

NOTE: You get given a premium aircraft for your first victory in game!
Need a faster download? Switch Language in Launcher.

>Wiki with Release Trees and General Tactics:
wiki.warthunder.com/index.php

>Fan created skins, missions, locations, fictions etc...
live.warthunder.com/ (Warning! Pure weeaboo and horsefucker autism abound)

>Ammunition Types
wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Category:Ammunition

>All the Air RB/SB maneuvers you would want to know + Engine thingamabobs:
steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=200974026

>Every Airplane Instrument Panel translated
mediafire.com/view/q4nybrogygdchdb/ND's_aircraft_reference_guide.pdf

>Joystick Comparisons:
xbitlabs.com/articles/multimedia/display/joystick-roundup_8.html

>Veeky Forums chatroom
kys

>teamspeak
kys

>DIY Headtracking
pcgamer.com/how-to-build-your-own-ir-head-tracker/
ebay.com/itm/161710468074

>Reminder: This general is under siege by Gaijin paid shills, wows shitters outside their containment thread and >>>/gaschamber/ cancer forcing shitposters. Do not respond to the shitposters. Report, ignore and move on. Do not encourage the shitposters.

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/4xczuo/heads_up_youtubers_your_monetization_can_be/
mega.nz/#!6YJylIpa!dlXf1LY9lDeJyI5hPw3jNlks97NpnbiTfLiRJnyiE3o
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>PT BOATS

...

>there are people who unironically fly jap planes

>Asshole teammate brings over three fighters over to the airfield that are chasing him while I'm on the runway repairing

>The AAA didn't shoot any of them down as they changed targets and went after me

Fuck it. I'm done.

nth for shipfag tears

When?

nth for the Il-28 is underpowered

Reminder that Gaijins choice to implement small boats makes large boats an impossibility in gameplay sense.

They have essentially created a situation where adding large ships will completely invalidate the existence of the small ships they have spent so much resources on.

Good, no more weebs shitting up war thunder spamming POI

Reminder that Gaijins choice to implement biplanes makes jets an impossibility in gameplay sense.

They have essentially created a situation where adding jets will completely invalidate the existence of the biplanes they have spent so much resources on.

>jets are Tier V
>biplanes are Tier I
>PT boats are all tiers

Good logic, shill.

proofs

>wahhhhh stop out turning me wahhhhhh

>Battleship
>WT

FAST
ATTACK
BOTES

>Thulle_administrator 9 hours ago
>We will show you additional boats during the Gamescom 2016, stay tuned!

give me one good reason other than muh gup

>implying paddle boats arent enough for weebs to spam poi

see you on river maps :^)

>Inna Centurion 3
>Run up against a T-34/85
>Knock out all but one crew men with two shots
>Proceed to spend FIVE SHOTS, all that bounce, trying to pen just under the driver's hatch.
>They all bounce.
>Fresh crewmen arrives and I have to kill it with a turret shot.

Even in Arkaden...

>according to Gaijin those nip tanks being transported from Kubinka are unrelated to Gamescom and War Thunder

dumb weeb

Tally cary with 4.5 inch howitzer?

>muh gup
what?

>can't even pierce t-34

>people acting as if slavs were the only nation that wouldn't have had many big ships
>ignoring "that" nation with the largest playerbase had naval strength on par with USSR too

jesus fuck with the "muh can't kill a T-34" shit

it's a 4.5inch howitzer on a rally car, you are telling me you couldn't POSSIBLY make it work because the finns couldn't reliably pen T-34s with it?

They would also have more than enough to fill a DD, CA and BB lines. Potatoes wouldn't without 3/4 of it being paper.

>They would also have more than enough to fill a DD, CA and BB lines.

No they wouldn't, deluded naziboo. Outside of submarines their navy was as relevant as the Soviets. The most meaningful engagements the Kriegsmarine participated in was when one of their ships got sunk.

>Implying a bote game needs more than bongs, burgers and jap lines.

reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/4xczuo/heads_up_youtubers_your_monetization_can_be/

>during WWII Germany's navy had 2 battleships, 2 battle cruisers and 3 pre-dreadnought battleships, 6 heavy and 6 light cruisers.
>They would also have more than enough to fill a DD, CA and BB lines.

>mfw PT boats

>Slavs can't make ship lines without paper
>Now look at these paper kraught lines that could be added
yfw Germany would Literally need Italy to fill out their lines without paper ships

>I want 5 hour matches where I slowly close the gap with my BB on an enemy 20 km from me while hiding behind rocks because that's what ships will be

A "filled out" german naval line would literally be Italy with a few German ships in it

+2 SL

Yes, because tanks and planes adhere so stringently to realism that there's no possible way that Gaijin could make some sacrifices for the sake of gameplay for ships. They are definitely not using the realism argument as a scapegoat to hide whatever their true reason is for not adding proper naval forces to the game.

>Fast Battleships and Battlecruisers don't exist
>Every game needs to be simulation mode
>I want every match to be torpedo spam fuckfests

How does someone manage to feel like they are in control of a ship that 1000+ crew men to even manage it?

Are you retarded or just pretending?

90% of UK WW2 navy was WW1 stuff. Stuff Germans had but got sank at the end of WW1.

And even using just their WW2 ships you can fill more than what nips had in air battles for like 2 years.

Same way someone controls a tank with 3-4 crew in it.

>controlling 4 people of whom only 3 really have meaning is the same as 1000 people

>controlling 1000 people of whom only 1 really have meaning is the same as controlling 1000

>if I post an image filled out with maintenance ships, Uboats, merchant raiders and coastal boats it'll make it appear bigger

Please, be more pathetic naziboo. It's really amusing me.

>the amount of people required to maintain, clean, and utilize the vehicle is relevant

What the fuck, is this an actual argument? I can't even tell anymore

>battleshields were made up of 99% irrelevant people

okay kid

>90% of UK WW2 navy was WW1 stuff.
fuck off retarded naziboo

>maintenance ships, Uboats, merchant raiders and coastal boats

It's funny because every line in WT Botes will be just that.

We're talking about big ships friendo, you seem to be struggling to stay on topic.

>Hurr british navy was all ww1 ships

Even if that was true, which it isn't even close to being true.

the german navy got completely fucked by these """"""""""""""""""ww1""""""""""""""""""" ships. that's Very embarrassing

Might want to read that post you're referring to again

Yeah, big ships that'll not be in the game. Top kek.

>spreading FUD

Nice one, but you're completely FALSE.

They ruled out LARGE ships like BATTLESHIPS and CARRIERS.

They made no objections and already said they would add in DESTROYERS, CRUISERS and such.

>90% of UK WW2 navy was WW1 stuff.
>what are Treaty limitations
>what are retrofits
>what are post-treaty battleships
>what is just plain lying

You could at least bother to form a coherent argument that doesn't betray the fact you know absolutely nothing, naziboo.

We know shitposter, we're mocking the naziboos thinking that slavs were the only ones without enough big ships.

>90% of UK WW2 navy was WW1 stuff. Stuff Germans had but got sank at the end of WW1.

>1920's ships
>1930's ships
>1940's ships
>WW1
How retarded are you? oh wait, you're a naziboo

>They made no objections and already said they would add in DESTROYERS, CRUISERS and such.
?????
Gaijin have literally said that even ships as large as Destroyers aren't being added.

Do you care to backup your shitposting with information or are you just throwing gasoline on a fire for the sake of it?

>The gunner in the tank isn't directly controlled by the player but instead the player just aims and click to fire
>This can't be done with ships because I say so.

>all 1000 men on a battleshield are cannon aimers

idiot

And Russia didn't have even half of that.

@@151564194
>90% of UK WW2 navy was WW1 stuff.

>source: my anus

DELET THIS TOVARISH

>Several games long dead or still alive and well give the player control of such ships in both arcade and simulation settings
>But clearly it's impossible to do so WT isn't going to do it

technically they did everything BUT literally say they won't be added

>Destroyers aren't being added.
????? stop spreading FUD you fucking retard

Amazing butthurt.

Germans had more than enough to fill a tree with adding just few paper designs.

Something WT is doing anyways.

Potato navy would be literally nothing but paper shit. They had 3 old as fuck rusted BB's and that's it.

>all this nazi bashing

I'm not a naziboo, but certain bote game Steel Ocean has complete SS, Cruisers and Battleship/Battlecruiser lines, with a couple of destroyers.

% of UK WW2 navy was WW1 stuff. Stuff Germans had but got sank at the end of WW1.
>posted from my bismarck as HMS rodney lifts its turrets from it's barbette
>posted as the Rodney punches through the Bismarckturret and out the back
>posted as the scharnhorst gets sunk by the King George V, without it even doing any returning damage to the KGV
>posted as the graf spee... HAHAHA the graf spee what a joke of a shit

Actually, that applies to the entire German navy. one big steaming pile of shit that lost every open sea engagement vs RN apart from one.

lmao, tell how most of those ships ended? Wait, they ended as kill markings on the Warspites barrel

Gravivmeme Tactics: Mius Front mega link from last thread
mega.nz/#!6YJylIpa!dlXf1LY9lDeJyI5hPw3jNlks97NpnbiTfLiRJnyiE3o
enjoy )

GAS THE MiGGERS! KOREAN WAR NOW!

>We could've Player Controlled carriers with player controlled planes.
>IT'S OF BORING AND SLOW COMRADE

>>posted from my bismarck as HMS rodney lifts its turrets from it's barbette
>>>posted as the Rodney punches through the Bismarckturret and out the back
>>posted as the scharnhorst gets sunk by the King George V, without it even doing any returning damage to the KGV

>Naziboos will defend this

is this dolphin porn?

Autism in this thread is fucking amazing.

Germans had one of the largest navies at the end of WW1.

How does a major power like Japan compare? Ise is a 1915 ship easily comparable the what Germans had back then.

Then it's Nagato in 1917 and fucking nothing all the way to Yamato. And then nothing after Yamato. While Germans had Bayern that entered service in 1917. And then all their WW2 stuff.

It would be just as easy to fill their tree as IJN.

Stop talking about shit you have no idea about.

>gas the fighterniggers cancer war now

>player coltrolled carriers
>CV: Bomb that airfield noobs, I'm your mothership
>I refuse!
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>Germans had one of the largest navies at the end of WW1.
>this means their navy was good

That's not how it works muhammed al Berlin-ani

awful lot of dolphin porn then

>using dozens of ships and planes to hunt one ship after it hilariously raped your pride has anything to do with filling game trees

I think you forgot your meds.

And? Soviet air force was dogshit in reality yet it's in game.

oh, you sweet summer child

>using dozens of ships
Yes dude, the HMS Rodney and HMS King George the V sure are a lot of ship

>and planes
Fuck dude, I forgot that a swordfish carrying a torpedo was the entire RAF

Either way, the bismarck was sunk by a ship from 1922. Your "most advanced ship" was out-classed by a ship from 1922. Stop trying to justify the Sinksmarine being dogshit

>this means their navy was good

Nobody is even talking about that you retarded /pol/ sperg. They have enough ships to be playable in game.

And if we are talking about retarded navy fiascos in WW2 nobody beats the brits.

>hood.jpeg
That looks more like the scharnhorst tbqh

See here: Here: and here:

>raped your pride
>unironically posted as the Bismarck get's crippled by a swordfish carrying a torpedo made for sinking trawlers and then finished by the Rodney

Damn you sure showed those anglos. haha yeah, you're totally not salty af

>In all, six battleships and battlecruisers, two aircraft carriers, thirteen cruisers, and twenty-one destroyers were committed to the chase

Stop embarrassing yourself.

>most of which were recalled back to port after the Rodney and King gorge V was scarmbled

Stop embarrassing yourself
Also, this whole time, I was thinking "how can one person be so retarded"
Then i realised you were a naziboo weeb

naziboos and slavs are the reason we are not getting big ships?

Feels bad man.

>Nagato in 1917
>comissioned in late 1920
>modernized in 1934–36
Wow, you really made me think!

>>In all, six battleships and battlecruisers, two aircraft carriers, thirteen cruisers, and twenty-one destroyers were committed to the chase

How many actually left their ports? 2: the KGV and Roddie

>I read only part of the wiki page
The post

Wow, you can be so proud of sinking a damaged ship that fucked your flagship and pride of RN and forced another KGV BB to run away.

And nothing of this has anything to do with germans having enough to fill a game line.

WoWS Nazi BB line has 2 paper ships out of 10.

The composition of the Soviet fleets in 1941 included:[7]

3 aged battleships,
7 cruisers (including 4 modern Kirov-class heavy cruisers),
59 destroyer-leaders and squadron-destroyers (including 46 modern Type 7 and Type 7U destroyers),
218 submarines,
269 torpedo boats,
22 patrol vessels,
88 minesweepers,
77 submarine-hunters

nice attempt, naziboo ((

>may appear
>decided based on results of closed beta

We've been over this, this is Gaijin's way of saying "no". Fucking retard, I bet you believed them when they said they were adding bomber cockpits too.

>Wow, you can be so proud of sinking a damaged ship
Tell me friend. How did it get damaged :^)
>that fucked your flagship
literally posted as it dies to something twice it's age using WW1 tech
>forced another KGV BB to run away
Hmmmm, I wonder why that one ship ran away from the 2 other german ships with their reinforcements arriving

>disproven by quote
>LOL NO THEY MEAN NO GUYS YOU WONT GET THEM

Okay retard, go fuckoff back to /wowsg/

Yup, a navy full of dated pre-dreads and pre-WW1 ships, definitely on par with the actual WW1 ships that had undergone heavy retrofitting other nations had at the start of WW2.

every time you post, I lose braincells

>disproven
>literally "well we MIGHT CONSIDER adding it after the results of the closed beta comrade )))"

Boy you sure showed me wrong, Destroyers and cruisers are definitely getting added.

>cold war vehicles are never getting added
>added in

Using this logic BBs will be added eventually

>Hurr durrr a german ship managed to sink a ship below it's weight class
>WHAT DO YOU MEAN THR GERMAN NAVY WAS BAD?
>IT BEING SUNK BY A 1922 SHIP AND A BIPLANE IS ALL PROPAGANDA

I hate naziboos