V8 fags get mad. Edition 1

How does it feel knowing that the 4cylinder, 6cylinder, and 8 cylinder camaro are ALL faster than the ecoboost?

if it doesn't have 5.0 badges and a spoiler then it's probably definitely a v6 or ecoboost

Having trouble figuring out why I should be mad

>V6 Camaro 2016
>Runs 0-60 in 5.1
>Quartermile in 13.5
>Faster than all pre-2011 V8 GT muscle
>EPA city/highway driving: 20/29 mpg
>No Premium fuel required
>Engine redlines at 7200rpm so it's fun as fuck
>Priced at 27,000 USD
>10,000$ cheaper than the V8's

V6 is the better option, at least with the 2016+ camaro's. Better bang for your buck, if you're going to spend 40,000$ on a car you might as well get something else.

>V8 Camaro 2015
>0-60 in 4.6
>1/4 mile in 12.9
>15/24MPG
>implying redline is the only thing that that can make an engine fun

Also,2016 V6's cost about 28K in stripper form, an I4 is 27K though. Meanwhile, you can get a lightly used 2015 with more power, better performance, and a lot more options already included, for less than 25K, which more than makes up for the MPG difference and premium fuel. Hell, I'm seeing some convertibles for 25K, which definitely is more fun per dollar than a V6 2016.

>0-60 in 5.1

Youll hardly ever see this. Remember this was done under ideal conditions(cool temp, no headwind) on a certain track with wide sticky tires, and probably was the best out of 100 test runs.

They claimed high 5's for the 2013 mustang I had, but I remember getting in the low 7's once. Granted it had the base economy tires but still, take those 0-60 figures with a grain of salt.

the new camaro in all its forms can outhandle a v6 mustang and the ecoboost mustang. but a PP ecoboost is probably even with the 4 & 6 cylinder new camaros. Looks are subjective too, the mustang looks better i think.

I don't get why I would be mad?

It's the Ecoboost. You can tell because those are the PP wheels not available on the V6.

Sure buddy

BTFO!!!

Why they sell a mustang why a 4cylinder turbo when the v6 is pretty same thing without the crap that turbos give you.
Why don't they use the ecoboost on a "light" sportcar. A gt86 competitor with a proper engine would be great.
>inb4 ford already got a lot of sportcars for an economy brand

My gt had a factory spoiler delete, no idea why but I was happy about it.

ecobeast makes more torque than the v6, better fuel economy, and a bit more horsepower. Also takes better to tunes. You can get that thing to beat stock GTs with very minor mods. Cant say the same about the v6

the 2015 camaro is fucking shit though

Ford went 100% Jew on the turbo and stock intercooler. But full bolt-on's and 93 is 400/400 whp/tq. E30 you can get an extra 50 tq and a lil more HP depending on tuner. Full bolt on's and tune for the v6 you might be scraping 300whp if that, torque would probably be more around 250-270.

>2011 V6 Mustang PP
0 to 60 5.1 seconds
Quarter Mile 13.7

Camaro cucks finally getting with the times.

You are right, you have to turbo boost the v6 to reach its maximum potential. Although a tune and some minors mods really helps with acceleration (specially changing the rear end axle radius).
Fastest 4cyl and v6 mustangs are around 10 secs.

what is the joke there about the interior?

This is my first time on Veeky Forums, but my old neighbor was the head of the interior design team for the mustang. I even have a concept he drew on my wall

The shifter looks funny but i posted that image because i feel like that when I'm driving it.

The shifter looks funny but i posted that image because i feel like that when I'm driving it.

I actually like the 2011 interior a lot.

>yfw with e85 my car will be faster than stock V8 camero and mustangs

>Camaro V8
0 to 60 3.9
Quarter mile 12.2

I don't think so tim.

>wanting that extra weight

>deluding yourself into thinking anything other than a v8 pony car isn't an embarrassment

simply envisioning that level of cuckoldry is mesmerizing.

>do you know what qualifies as millennial

So much this. nearly all of Veeky Forums are millennials (myself included) yet there are so many posts complaining about millennials

ffs, put some magic tire shine on those rubbers..

So i hurd you liek understeeer

The poster could be a millennial and the statement could still be valid.
Nearly all of Veeky Forums (myself excluded) lack basic reading comprehension skills.

I don't understand V8 fags. If size matters, why not going for V12? A turbo 4 makes much more sense than a V8, it's lighter and much cheaper to buy and maintain. Why be a brute when you can be smart?

How does an economy engine in a 3700bub coupe smart?
and they don't make v12 mustoongs

I dont care what size the engine is, so long as the power NEEDED is there.

but I do prefer the sound of a v8 over anything else.