A Corvette ZR1 is coming in 2017. Just in time for it to be destroyed by the Ford GT

A Corvette ZR1 is coming in 2017. Just in time for it to be destroyed by the Ford GT.


caranddriver.com/news/2018-chevrolet-corvette-zr1-spied-news

...and how much does the GT cost...?

...And how does that disprove my point...?

If the ford GT costs three times as much as the ZR1 then what comparison is there?

It doesn't matter how much it costs, dumbass. It's still going to win. That's my point.

So if the Ford GT gets throttled by the new Bugatti then you wouldn't say thats an unfair comparison?
Also nice ad hominem, really highlights how little you have to say.

Yea, sure. In a straight line. Not around a track.

Are you fucking serious or serious retarded?

>Dumps the personal attacks
>Redirects to a diffrent argument
Tag out man its all over

So why didn't you pick a Nissan Sentra to compare? Are you a weeb?

Good I'm glad we've established it doesn't disprove my point.
>hurr durr it wins in a straight line
Drag racing goes on cuck.
It doesn't have ecoboost.

R
E
KEK
T

Do you know how to read?
I'm saying your post hereIs irrelevent, because it is.

GM fangirls got triggered again.

ford>gm

GTR fanboys BTFO

>i-its irrelevant!
Drag racing goes on cuck.

hi OP, you know the bottom right shows the number of posters right? Samefaggotry sure is hard

Not really

There's 5 posters in the thread.

...I'm saying that I don't care about any argument you are making because it is merely a deflection, as the two cars are at two very diffrent price points. Who cares which one is faster in a line or on a track if one costs 120k and the other costs 400k?

>GM faggots confusing GTRs and GTs
I guess they're both to fast for you to get a good look at anyway, they may as well be the same
>GM BTFO by a pair of V6s
How will they recover?

three at the time of the posting

>it's just a deflection
How? A Bugatti can't handle and wouldn't win on a track.
>who cares
Anybody who is a car enthusiast.
>no evidence
typical

Too bad that Ford is treating the GT like an actual hyper car and very, very few people will actually be able to own one.

Where as GM doesn't see the marketing in making a car that won't sell. The Corvette will sell, the GT wont. Case closed.

Reading comprehension.
Or troll. Probably troll.

>"the corvette will sell, the gt won't"
>gm fangirls blatantly lying at this point after getting btfo
Ford sold over 6000 GTs within 25 days. They literally rejected people because they didn't have enough. What are you talking about?
Yes, you are a troll. I'm glad we're on the same page.

The C6 ZR1 is the best Corvette ever made, hopefully the new one tops it

>beating the Ferd GT

Yeah, that ain't happening though

Can't sell what you don't have, so they actually only sold 500. The had 6000+ interested buyers.
If 20,000 people express interest in buying your 2000 kia shitbox™ you can ultimately only sell one, as your mother's husband only has the one kia shitbox™ that you stole the keys to.

t. assmad gm fangirl

I don't care about GM or Ferd (But... But... ECOBOOSTT!!). All about dat TFSI son.

...

>uses retarded analogy
>expects a logical response
gm fangirls everyone.....

I know your a troll, but thats not me. Posters went from 8 to 9, so you should know that.
So are you upset about bus fare going up or something? Or is your stepdad beating your mom especially hard today?

So...No arguments just insults??? Great, I see I've won.

citation needed

From my understanding, they only sold 500. There's plenty of interested buyers but Ford hasn't stepped up to actually make those 5500+ more that people want.

>GM comes out with the new zr1
>opens the engine bay
>DOS TURBOS
>Everyone goes crazy
>Laughtingtwinturbov8's.jpg
>V6 STILL ISN'T ENOUGH

[overheating intensifies]

>wanting a turbo V8
Modern turbo engines sound like shit.

Not wanting that pure power and Spool.

>yfw Alphonse LITERALLY is a NOCAR faggot

>Just in time for it to be destroyed by the Ford GT.

[citation needed]

Will either of them have a manual transmission option?

MÄMMI

Corvette most likely, gm doesn't cater to meme trends
GT only is dual clutch auto

The GT will be driven by youtubers and nu-males, so it will come as auto only.

>wanting to go slower

Don't you retards get bored of arguing about the same shit all the time?

>He thinks an auto will make him as fast as a racecar driver, with no engine braking, and not being able to shift down until the ecu deems it safe, aka 2000 rpm below the redline.

You sound like a cuck. Too bad you're too poor and insignificant for a GT. It would have been a perfect fit for you.

>cuck is projecting this early into the argument

>Calls "no argument"
>Provides no argument.

It's ok, take your time and wipe those tears away before you post.

>cuck is projecting again
typical

You can start arguing any time. I'm waiting cu- My dear friend who likes to share his spouse with african american men.

Stop saying cuck pls.

Protip, the GT's automated manual is of absolutely no relation to your slushbox Corvette.
>GM
>trying to compete
Kinda sad really

t. assblasted cuck

>[citation needed]
BTFO again. Try harder, or better yet provide a decent argument with a source to back it up.

Still waiting on those arguments. So far I'm seeing "Nigger on twitter" types of arguments from you.

You're the retard who's making speculation on car that isn't out yet. There is no argument. You're just brain damaged.

>citation needed
>denial
GT's "auto" is literally a DCT. In other words, an automated manual in function and form.
Corvette's auto is literally a conventional hydromatic planetary slushbox.

BTFO!!!


How WILL they recover??


Anal rage eminent

gt gets shrekt by the 918

lol shit car

[citation needed]

>automated manual
No user operated clutch = automatic

autos suck bruh

No kidding.
>GM fangirls in denial
>GM fangirls beg to be spoonfed in their lack of enlightenment
>GM fangirls cannot compete

ebin

.
>Get's called out.
>Resorts to name calling

Don't start something you can finish.

>Not even a single clutch performance auto for maximum immersion, or that little one you can get from an auto
>Automated """""manual"""""
>He actually believes this.

Also who mentioned the corvette? We're talking about the ford millenial mobile right now.

>No user operated clutch = automatic
>according to my arbitrary definition
That's why I stated "automated manual" a it's not only referred to in the automotive industry, but also heavy vehicles and mobile plant sector. Sorry about your torque converter bro.

>can't finish
Just like the corvette at lemans, kek.

I know right?
>Ford fangirls in denial
>Ford fangirls don't have any sources about the "Godmachine"
>Ford fangirls cannot compete because nobody will compete in that car

>can't compete
Nobody mentioned the corvette. ;^)

>automated manual
>he actually doubts this
I'd prefer to pay attention to form and function a opposed to a layman semantic definition
>Also who mentioned the corvette? We're talking about the ford millenial mobile right now
Sorry, I only used the example to highlight how far ahead of its competition the GT is.
Although admittedly, taking a leaf out if your book of semantics, if GM can't compete then I guess it's not really "competition".

>Can't even drive without catching fire for 6 six hours.

>post yfw gm has NEVER beaten ford at lemans
kek

>"arbitrary definition"
>literally had to specify "automated" manual because he knows hes wrong
Sorry you don't know automotive basics, or at least pretend you don't to suit your asinine argument.
Most importantly, sorry your favorite car isn't man enough to have a manual option.

lol, gm fangirls got triggered again

I was going to ask "how can GM ever recover", but that would imply they were ever in a position of superiority. kek
>yfw GM fangirls abandon ship
>weighed down to the bottom of the ocean with their overweight V8 anchor

lel, careful now. Don't wanna trigger them

>Sorry you don know automotive basics
Nice projection.
"automotive basics" are more inline with function as opposed to semantic definitions.
Sorry you don't know automotive basics.

>Post yfw ford got beaten by a 4 year old car, and couldn't even secure a podium.
>""Ford"" engine needs to be fitted to a specially made, not ford, british limited production car, made only for one reason, to compete against a commercially made, multi purpose sports car.

t. Triggered ford fangirl.

>ferrari literally got raped on the anniversary of Ford's win
kek
>no! it doesn't count!
BTFO!


>post yfw the fastest nurburgring time is held by a 6 cylinder
V8 cuckolds BTFO yet again.

>semantic definition
a manual is the sum of its parts
a user engaged clutch and gear selector. Learn what semantics means.

>"No clear winner"
>Nippon steel folded a 1000 times is on par with a car made by toilet seats and leaf springs and put together by bubba and his sister
>He thinks that's a win

Sharpen up those katana, sushi boy, 'cause it's time for a seppuku.

>beats it on every track
>no! it doesn't count!
so easy to trigger GM fangirls

>Starts arguing about statements that were not even stated
Lay down on the alcohol fangirl. Also:
>had one fluke win in WEC
>Thinks that will secure the championship

Ford was doomed to cry in a corner while ferrari will take the championship easily, while ford will be remember for winning one 24 hour race in it's whole racing programme.

>fluke win
>ferrari fangirls literally lying after getting btfo

You're sounding like a broken record.
>learn what semantics means
Rich when your only retort is citing semantics. It's easy to fall behind when your only option is a slushbox though. kek

>He thinks I'm a "gm fangirl" to hide his insecurity.
>GTR manages to beat the corvette on every track
>Still not a clear winner

Wow, good one nissan. Trully the king of arbitrary statements

>admits the GTR is faster
kek, gm fangirls btfo

Crying about leader lights while Sandbagging the 7% rule.

>ferrari would have won if they weren't cheating
wow, lmao

>hiding he's a GM fangirl to hide his insecurities
Fangirls everyone...

BWAHAHAHAH!
They should stick to making pasta and pizza.

Except I'm not citing semantics as an out, you are. Learn what hypocrite means.
I shouldn't expect more from a guy who needs a computer to help him shift.

>"Based" Ford got BTFO off the podium in nurburgring
>"N-No! It doens't count! We won at LeMans!"
>Ford couldn't even take radillion, which is literally a high speed chicane without crashing
>"N-No! It doens't count! We won at LeMans!"
>In silverstone they couldn't even go lower than 2:01s when ferrari did 1:58s
>"N-No! It doens't count! We won at LeMans!"
>The corvette had a 1-2 at daytona 24 with the GT being several laps down
>"N-No! It doens't count! We won at LeMans!"

Have you taken your medication lately? You seem to be deluded

>more projecting
>accusing others of hypocrisy
Your mind is as deluded as the hydraulic fluid slushing around in your torque converter. But then that's expected from a fangirl.

>ferrari lost the only race the world cared about
kek

All I'm seeing is "no clear winner", so I can't say the GTR won.
>Ford needs to resort to cheating in order to win one race

kek

>implying ferrari didn't cheat
lmao, fangirls are delusional

>b-b-but all these other irrelevant races
I can cite my local autocross results too.

>He thinks race car fans only care about LeMans.

So not only you're a busrider, but you're not also a car racing fan. Noted.

Did you require assistance from a computer to help you compose that? because it was rather boring to read.

>I bet this goes over his head