>With a Class-Exclusive 160-horsepower turbo engine+, nearly 50/50 weight distribution, a responsive four-wheel independent suspension, electric power steering and a convertible top, what could be better?
What are your predictions? Will it get me a GF?
Samuel Ortiz
Items can get you laid, user. They can't get you good relationships tho.
Anyway no. That car would be pretty great with 200 horses, and god-tier weekend car with 250. But it doesn't have that. Also, Fiat engine = reliability issues, 50/50 actually isn't the ideal f/r ratio, and this car is a jewel for the used market, not the new one.
Jonathan Foster
jeeps get you girls and get you laid, roadsters don't unless they're new porches
Hudson Long
>Fiat engine = reliability issues stopped reading here
Lucas Johnson
le italian car = unreliable meme >nice
Also what is more hp going to do? It's still going to be slow compared to fast cars in the price range, the fuck is with people and their desire to make cars that are meant to be slow fast?
Caleb Foster
if it was literally any other engine in the fiat lineup he'd be right the 1.4 is the completely nonsensical exception to the rule
Xavier Sanchez
Oh hey, it's like a Miata except uglier, has a boosted engine that doesn't make any more power so all it does is reduce response, more expensive, and slower.
Matthew Allen
...
Josiah Taylor
Because its a 1.4 turbo on a platform made for a 2.0 NA engine The smaller engine barelly makes the same power and now has turbo lag People wanted at least the same power or more from a turbo miata, not less 180hp should be the base model with a 200hp option and it would be a blast of a car But for what is it, get a miata if you want rwd fun or a mini s if you don't mind ff