Cars that are sheep in wolf's skin.
Cars that are sheep in wolf's skin
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
fortmyers.craigslist.org
twitter.com
Do you understand that idium?
...
...
Cars that look fast but are slow.
...
...
...
...
...
>Torque: 162 lb-ft
DELET THIS
>torque means fast
Damn my truck must be a fucking super car then
From a NA 2.0-2.2 liter 4-banger making 240hp.
You'll get over it.
Haha it sucks for getting through swamps
Nevermind I read that backwards. I was trying to figure out on what planet the brz/frs is fast.
I don't think it gets better than this
>106 hp 1.6 I4
>110 mph top speed
>disgustingly bad interior quality
Anything marketed to a "young demographic"
Think you mean the other way around buddy
why was this even made/
Because they could.
...Oh wait, they went bankrupt after making a hundred or so of them.
You obviously don't, you can't even spell idiom correctly.
Current Gen Dodge Charger. Literally the best and thread-ending example.
They maybe dogs now but 200hp from an inline 4 wasn't anything to shake a stick at back in the 80's.
those never looked fast
...
...
This thing.
...
>240hp is fast
Greatest young demographic car coming through.
>trying to figure out on what planet the brz/frs is fast
youtube.com
What was their design language on this thing? "Everything"?
hp is fast
>hp is a measurement for speed
kys
I actually know someone who drives this. Absolutely disgusting.
>this weight 2.5 TONS
>707 hp edition available
fuck off
Ok now I don't think you understand that idiom
We're talking about cars, not tractors
Too fucking heavy for its 3.0L. Beautiful interior though.
Challenger
Golf GTI beats the R/T lol
looks like a hamster
Everything about that car is beautiful.
I really want one but I'm poor as fuck.
Yeah I know they're cheap on CL but I can't pay for insurance and supposedly they're expensive to maintain too.
Indeed.
except through most of the rev range, it makes less HP than an ND Miata. Only after the Miata hit the redline does the Honda start making power. 90% of the time, the S2000 is slower and heavier than the Miata.
looks like it snorts when it laughs
Volvo 850R
I would fucking hope that a car made 10 years later is better, you fucking idiot
I had a 300zx TT,. It was heavy but 300hp stock was enough to move it.
SXT or R/T maybe. Scat Pack or SRT? Nah.
...
Which is a shame, because the chassis is bloody brilliant.
My grandfather bought one new back in 87 and he still has it. Awesome car tho.
God damn that is ugly
>180whp
>almost 3000 lbs
why
it had so much potential. If it was pushing Rx-7 numbers I'd be tempted to get one as my next car.
...
...
even the turbo is slow kek
It was fast in its day, and had plenty of mid range power where you wanted it to be for a grand tourer
I have the turbo and I concur
...
I remember seeing a comparison chart between a Challenger SRT and a Mustang with the 3.7L V6 and track pack, and the Mustang was faster around a track.
Maybe an user has it?
Based hamster car.
Supposedly they're pretty light on maintenance, but if you're under 25, insurance is going to be insane.
Umm, yeah... That's why I specifically said
>R/T
In a straight line, yes absolutely this. I have an n/a SW20 and it's like the polar opposite of a sleeper. Everyone wants to "race" you on the highway, and you'll lose to about 90% of them. At least it has more torque than my brother's Integra Type R lel
I know I was so excited for likeeping I'm gonna buy it this then I read the specs. Biggest disappointment of my 2016.
...
>buys a base model
>expects it to perform
i'm sorry you were too shit to buy a GT, i on the other hand will be busy whipping supras through the touge
I never said I expected it to perform well in a straight line. I knew it had low power. Also I said in a straight line, so you ain't wooping any Supra for shit on the highway with a 3S-GTE unless it's making like +80hp above stock. I'd woop a Supra on a tight touge too. Supras are pigfat as fuck.
boost increase and a bit of weight shedding and i was outpulling a mate of a mates MA70 and sitting on his arse through the twisties.
assuming stock vs stock
163kw @ ~1250kg vs 172kw @ 1540kg
mr2 comes out on top.