Is a v8 really that much better than a turbo 4?

fuck off tiny dicked muricuck

>no replacement for displacement
There is. It's called forced induction.

Nice ride Hnnngggg
bump

Wrong

You get our discount online and in store

That's why an 8.4 liter NA V10 set 13 lap records, right?

i4T is a nice engine configuration, even in mustangs.
You have to remember, the turbocharged 4 cylinder mustang in the 80s was the most expensive one, and the only one to have 5 lugs until the cobra, if I remember correct.

That's cute.

>EcoBoost is included with the 4 banger
Can't even get the EcoBoost technology on the V8.

Oh, it's you

In mustangs when?

Guess who just got their Ecoboost emblem today ;>)

>people can spot me without my name
I love being king

the veeate is pretty amazing, but so is the ecoboost. If money is an issue, and you really, really want the mustang, get the ecoboost with performance pack (required).

if not, get the vee ate. but don't push yourself financially for it. the mustang is a rock when it comes to depreciation and if you can barely afford the payments the insurance might do you in.

2017 Raptor is the one to get
>HNnnnggggggggggg Ecoboost V8

You probably won't even be able to get one they'll be all sold out before they hit showroom floors! I totally agree Ecoboost V8 is going to be so bad ass Everyone else gets rekt!

why didn't they put the 5.0 ecoboost in the GT

>V8 cuckolds believe this
Ford already confirmed there will only be a Ecoboost V6 in the Raptor.

450 HP and 500 LB FT of torque are the final specs.

Stay mad.
It literally wouldn't fit.

>he bought a 4 cylinder pony car

>buttmad GM fangirls found the thread
They just say that bc they don't want GM to try and copy. Just want and see, it's coming. It's gonna be a huge bombshell too
>gmfags on suicide watch

that's gonna be fookin gnarly

I love you King Alphonse. You are my friend, and I love you. Please push your penis into my asshole

ferd v8 > ecoshit

...

Even a V6 is better than 4cyl turbo.

Kek

Ecofags on suicide watch

A turbo 4 is great, but not in a Mustang.

>V6
>10 less hp
>40 lbs/ft less torque

Nah.

>Still way faster.
>2012 0 to 60 v6 > 5.3 1/4 13.8
>2016 ecoboost premium >6.3 1/4 14.5

T. Motortrend.

Considering their 2015 Ecoboost review had much faster times I'd say they got a dud of a car for the 2016 model.

And even then, the 2015 version was still slower than a 2012 v6.

Also what kind of v6 did they got for the 2011 model? It was pushing almost 5 seconds flat on the 0 to 60 if i remember correctly.

Plenty of people run low 13s on stock I4s. Motortrend isn't gospel, brah.

mustang6g.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16741

>Also what kind of v6 did they got for the 2011 model? It was pushing almost 5 seconds flat on the 0 to 60 if i remember correctly.

That was the performance package V6 that did that time. 3.31 gears VS 2.73 (standard for V6).

still 5.1-.5.2 was highly unlikely unless you had the best conditions possible. More like 5.7 or so under most conditions.

I would say 5.3 or 5.5 for the perfomance packaged model, since there are base models pushing 5.7 0 to 60 bone stock.

youtu.be/tbKWLZxO7XI

13.2 seconds seems highly unlikely though, never heard of a bone stock ecoboost being that fast.

>13.2 seconds seems highly unlikely though, never heard of a bone stock ecoboost being that fast.
>picture of the slip from the track posted in the thread

Stop being obstinate, dude.

bruh ecoboost is a fucking engine.