Explain this

Explain this.

How can you logically defend this?

Other urls found in this thread:

caranddriver.com/features/lightning-lap-2006-chevrolet-cobalt-ss-supercharged-honda-civic-si-volkswagen-gti-page-3
caranddriver.com/features/lightning-lap-2006-chevrolet-corvette-z06-page-15
caranddriver.com/reviews/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-road-test
caranddriver.com/features/how-does-c-d-test-cars
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

honda v6 has like 240hp, its not weak by any means

american cars were pretty shit in the mid 2000s

> Cherrypicking the competition...

Try again riceboy

Stay triggered

Try again fucknut

caranddriver.com/features/lightning-lap-2006-chevrolet-cobalt-ss-supercharged-honda-civic-si-volkswagen-gti-page-3

The Cobalt was also the most settled of the three, with excellent body control through the high-speed esses. The GTI felt soft, but its body motions remained fairly stable. The Civic was the floppiest.

The Civic was also the slowest, owing to gearing that required several extra shifts each lap and a less-than-strong engine. The GTI was 1.4 seconds quicker. With its DSG, it was best to select manual mode and perform your own downshifts with the left paddle, leaving the twin-clutch transmission to upshift on its own. The Cobalt SS's supercharged Ecotec engine collaborated with an excellent gearbox to charge down the straights with authority. The result was a maximum speed of 117.1 mph and a lap time of 3:20.6 — four to five seconds quicker than the other front-drivers, the GTI and the Civic.

rly nigger?

>moves goalposts
Stay BTFO
>moving goalposts
Nice try

Same article. Answers your covette silliness...

caranddriver.com/features/lightning-lap-2006-chevrolet-corvette-z06-page-15

Still, with a lap of 3:01.1, it was the fastest of the LL3s and awfully close to taking overall honors.

>car and driver
Literally trash.


They use different drivers every time.

The civic is still faster

I'll trust Car & Driver over your infographics shit...

Enjoy your fake lap times. The civic is still faster.

Stay retarded

> independent source v. name calling and bong picture

>literally uses different drivers each time
Stay retarded. The civic is faster.

> independent source v. name calling and metrosexual pic

>comparing cars of the same year
>moving goalposts
Wot?

caranddriver.com/reviews/2006-chevrolet-impala-ss-road-test

Compare then straight across model years and it turns right around. Go figure.

>no argument
>using a different driver every time you test a new car

>How can you logically defend this?

No one is, they are both V6 cars with 240 HP.

>>moving goalposts

No one is you autist. You posted this same shit yesterday saying "2004 impala SS V8 5.3 is slower".

Yet, no such model exist! Its a V6 engine in the 2004 model...

Turns out, the 5.3 V8 IS faster when you actually pit the V8 vs the Honda...


Jesus Christ..

>faster
It isn't though, dumbass

Civic faster than a Tesla P100D... uh huh... keep smoking riceboy.

>can't quote the right person
Time to take your meds

...

Sometimes I wonder if you guys are legitimately autistic.

>Honda 3.0L V6 NA makes 240hp
>Chevy 3.8L V6 + SC makes 240hp
Cant be defended GM is just shit

>slower than the civic accord coupe
Lol
Rotflmao

> Facts are challenging

Deflecting from made up numbers...

Problem is, OP made this exact thread yesterday expect he claimed the 2004 impala SS to have a V8.....

Clearly baiting....

>slower than an accord coupe
Honda wins again

You should delete this thread user

Oh my god who fucking cares.

>the chevy is slower
>d-delete this thread
Lol
Stay triggered

One is built in mexico by a shitty company that has had multiple bailouts and recalls

One is built in ohio by a reliable company that didn't leach off taxpayers.

caranddriver.com/features/how-does-c-d-test-cars

>the article literally shows they have multiple testers
The lap times are bullshit

>Stay triggered

Now that you've been exposed id actually say that to you.

I dont care which one is faster, after all those cars are white trash tier/nigger tier at this point.

But at least get the facts right before trolling an automotive forum.

>facts straight
That the chevy is slower than an accord?

Friendly reminder to report spam posts.

I guess you cant read. I dont care. Dont own either car.

If you cant even figure out which engine a car has you probably shouldn't even be on here.

Is it?
>inb4 goalposts
Stay triggered

The chevy is slower than a 2016 accord coupe.

Stay BTFO

what fucking chevy?

>literally illiterate
As expected

lol.... thats not what was being discussed.

GG NO RE user.

I cant read OP help me!! What chevy is slower then a 2016 accord?

>literal damage control
Stay BTFO
Chevy impala ss

>Chevy impala ss

A 10 year old car is slower than a 2016 V6 Accord, Oh wow!

The OP was comparing a 2004 V6 accord to the SS, in this case the accord beats the V6 SS but the V8 SS wins as we all assume.

Nope.

Which Impala SS???
Does it have a V6? a V8?
What year?
OP what are we comparing?
0-60 times?
Lap times?

>all these people being baited by alphonse

Ignore thread and move on

>which impala ss
THERE IS ONLY ONE YOU FUCKING RETARD

No there is not you dumb fuck.

There is one with the 3.8 V6 supercharged and one with the 5.3 V8...

Either way, they were not that good. The V8 used the same trans as the regular V6 models and 75% of the time the trans needed to be rebuilt before 50K miles.

no one cares OP.

Then why did you write the same thing twice in your post? Are you genuinely autistic?

>no one cares
Nice subtle ragequit

Honda BTFO

Japanese BTFO.

>gm fangirls now samefagging after getting completely destroyed
Like pottery

Weebs BTFO.

>projecting
BTFO

>BTFO
BTFO

>BTFO
BTFO

Fuck off babycarrier. Suck dicks

>literally ragequitting

>resorting to greentext after getting rekt

How could Honda ever recover?

By having faster 0-60 times, kek

Did you mean 290?

...