>has turbocharged engine
>gets less than 200 HP
What's the point?
Has turbocharged engine
Aaron Bell
Other urls found in this thread:
greencarcongress.com
twitter.com
Wyatt Garcia
Efficiency and reliability
Leo Hughes
>turbo
>reliability
Pick one
Sebastian Parker
1.3 liter diesel fiat anyone?
Cameron Cooper
Turbos are reliable, this isn't the 80s you fucking retard
Henry Bailey
>Higher pressure in the intake manifold, block
>turbos, intercoolers and all the other shit they have
Sure m9 all those parts won't ever break.
Angel Watson
>turbos
>literally ( L I T E R A L L Y ) force more air into the cylinders so more fuel can be burned, resulting in more stress ont all engine components
Turbo engines will never be as reliable as an NA engine making the same power.
Logan Myers
>car companies can't engineer the engine to be reliable and turbo'd
When the car is designed to be a turbo and uses stronger internal parts it will last as long as any NA engine
Benjamin Brooks
>turbo charged F1 car
>engine lasts entire race
>same engine is used over and over again with just repairs being done
>top fuel NA drag racing
>engine lasts 4 seconds
>has to be thrown away and rebuilt everytime
Check mate NA fags.
Tyler Powell
>broken turbos
>leaking intercoolers
>cracked manifolds
Turbos don't last as long as the engine anyways so NA is the only solution
What you don't want to understand is that there are literally more parts that can fail therefore making the car less reliable