What's Veeky Forums's opinion on the Enzo vs the MC12?
Enzo VS MC12
MC12 Looks better imo, Has the racing cred and was slightly faster than the Enzo anyway probably because of better aerodynamics.
MC12, always.
MC12 went racing.
mc12 is sluggish and has worse brakes
We have a winner
but the enzo suffers from ugly modern car design where as the mc12 is timeless
MC12
Enzo a ugly
Exhibit B
I've seen and heard both of those in person, the MC12 is tuned to over 800hp. I was behind that MC12 in traffic once. It was so brutal and loud even at idle, you could hear it growling, howling and moaning over a kilometer away. The vinyl wraps on those cars look horrible in real life though.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
either way the enzo is faster and more responsive even if slightly less efficient
nice fish you have there
oh Neptune king of the sea
the Enzo is just a worse looking F50
pretty much
but what style is the mc12 even trying to ape ?
sure looks good
The Enzo is cool and a car I could see myself driving. The MC12 is a cool car that I could see myself garaging.
The MC12 is like the F50 to me, something that I want but I know would be hell to live with.
which is a worse looking f40
enzo misses out by not having the derp face
This
almost
and this
F40 has an ugly ass though
F50 GT looks even better
shame they only made parts for three of them
Except the F40 came after, which makes it a better looking 288 GTO Evo
430 Scuderia had the best Ferrari ass
F50s are cheaper to run than an F40. They can eat clutches in 500 miles but it's an easy job at least. They aren't bad drivers on the street either, just hard to drive at really low speed
that in turn is a riced 208
also digging about I find the alfa romeo 16c bimotore it has a grill like the latter F360 and F430
and it has a gear box strait out of wat auto tecnica
two supercharged inline 8
6.3 litres
540 combined horsepower
1300 kg
362 kph top speed
known for shredding tires
Absolutely knew this would be the response. I've always preferred the F50.
430 did nothing right
Now I kinda want to see someone do this in a modern car. Imagine opening the frunk of an sw20 and seeing another engine there.
I do like how crazy the idea is
but it can be better for weight distribution to and gearbox just use one larger engine
Ferrari directed the design of the alpha 16C as a counter to the Mercedes and auto union cars
the German cars had more advanced metals that allowed larger capacity engines with out weight gain
also better chassis and fuel delivery systems
I will post some of the twin and quad engined cars I can remember
this 4wd cooper twini had some problems mainly getting the gears to shift at the same time or the engines to provide the right front to rear power out put
they had separate transaxles but a shared water cooling system
when they were hop lapping it
the rear most engine failed but it still beat all the other fwd minis just by having more mass at the back to provide grip
mickey thompson while mostly known now for drag radial tires
in his earlier time made drag racing cars
it is one v8 per driven axle with the diff housing off set around where the driver sits
two v8s joined together by chain drive link to one gear box that drives a differential for one axle
x2
apparently it had two tiny throttle pedals that fit under one foot and only mickey was able to master driving it
later he make the challenger 2 that only has two engines but is much the same layout but thinner
he was murdered before it could be run
his Danny Thompson has taken the chassis and put more modern engines in it
Twin Napier Lion W-12 aero engines
4wd and perhaps a little more than 2600 hp
theoldmotor.com
three Liberty L-12
36 cylinders, 81 litre displacement
around 1000 bhp or so
rear wheel drive and has no gear box or clutch
no diff either
two Rolls-Royce R driving the rear wheels
four wheels in front for some reason
to round up the list
Sunbeam silver bullet
Sunbeam 1000 HP aka slug
suzuki escudo pikes peak
...
both are THICC and I would smash