>a literal faggot who can't even afford gas
help yourself and go back to
>a literal faggot who can't even afford gas
help yourself and go back to
Not everyone uses your Ameritard units, Ameritard.
>have to fill up with fuel every 20 minutes
and even stopping every 20 minutes for fuel with only 210bhp the poor little rotary still managed to wipe the floor with pistoncucks so hard that FIA banned it from prototype racing for ever :^))
>only engine type to get banned from LeMans because the 787B was too good
Assmad piston cucks don't like it because they're scared of its unholy power-to-weight and power-to-displacement ratio
320km from a 55l tank do the math nerd
>Why do people still defend the rotary engine despite it having literally zero useful applications in a road car?
It's light, makes good power (especially considering it's packaging and weight), and it's reliable in the endurance sense of the word.
>Bad fuel economy
Not bad enough that they're completely impractical.
>They sound awful
Opinions.
>They burn oil
So do two strokes. Your point?
>More difficult to work on
Again, your opinion, and a lot of mechanics would disagree with you.
>They self destruct
So does a piston engine if you hammer it when cold, or shut it down abruptly.
>Unreliable
They endure.
It's not at all like driving a Soviet car, which is much, much worse. There's actually advantages of the rotary over piston engines, most of them being that high power density. They make less sense for a daily driver, sure, but they're good fun as a weekend car or track toy. To discount a specific engine type just by disliking several aspects (and not looking at it's positive ones) is simply to be ignorant.
>320km from a 55l tank
LOL
>especially considering it's packaging and weight
Who cares? Do you store your luggage in your engine compartment? Why do you need the extra space?
>Toyota LITERALLY couldn't do it at LeMans
TOYOTA NOT FOR LEMANS
>hp/kg is not important
stop being stupid
I thought it was more along these lines.