Look at this Civic. All low textured and shit. Nothing amusing about it and I can't believe people back then actually paid per month for this piece of shit car compared to a 2016 Civic.
Why do cars from 95-01 look like low textured GTA 3 cars?
Quality of paint, wear from the sun.
What the fuck were they thinking??? It doesn't look awe looking like the 87 Monte Carlo. Did people actually see this as """improvement"""?
LOOOK AT THIS. It isn't a late 90s vehicle but holy shit look how boring it is. Like what the fuck? What were they on when they were modeling this car? Compare this to a 1966 Mustang like WOW fuck it look like cheap plastic and its shit interior doesn't make up for it either
Fucking cheap plastic everywhere
>Muh CD Player upgrade
>Muh smaller body upgrade
>Muh vroom vroom gotta go fast 106 HP engine
>People financed this ugly hunk of plastic for 5 years
nigga these are all normie chariots from a bygone era
if you think those look plastic compared to vintage era cars, then just you wait and see what people will have to say about today's cars 20 years from now
>1996 was 20 years ago
>not loving 90-05 aesthetics
Kill yourself , comfiest time period for cars ever
>say that to my face maddafacka not online