believing GM or Ford are at the fore front of the engine efficiency race
pls reevaluate your life
believing GM or Ford are at the fore front of the engine efficiency race
pls reevaluate your life
Well it's nice that you're into cars but you have a lot to learn.
Durability is way more heavily weighted in the design process compared to car engines.
The Duratec at peak torque will be around 110-120% VE. But more VE on a turbo engine basically means more boost, and this means more fuel, and it usually doesn't mean more fuel efficiency.
kek
No.. you have a lot to learn.. In fact it seems like you've learned nothing and you should stop shilling blatantly wrong information on Veeky Forums.
Where do you get this BS from? moron
Even the German premiums are using turbos, look at how BMW' and Mercedes-Benz's nomenclature has changed. A 323i isn't a 2.3L anymore.
Turbos have become so widespread because of emissions regulations.
It's been a while since a grease monkey tried to tell me what time it is but it still amuses.
nice larping
the only grease monkey you've ever met is your mother when she goes to the basement to hand you some hotpockets
You're so obviously wrong it's painful to read.
The entire reason every race car is turbo now is fuel efficiency.
waaw ebin burn user
sure showed me
yes it must be all about efficiency with f1 rules that say "1.5 litres, na or fi, you choose"
The new F1 cars are 30% more efficient at the same power level as the N/A v8's despite making more horsepower.
Every endurance car has a turbo, even when hp is limited by the rules. There's a reason for that. Hint: It's fuel efficiency.
This