110k$ a year to work in some nigger infested california ghetto

110k$ a year to work in some nigger infested california ghetto

or

63k$ to work in some "doesn't even have a stoplight" logging town in washington

what's the job?

If I don't have to interact with people, I don't really give a shit where it is

I'd take the PNW over Southern California for any amount of money. But I'm a Michigander, so both those salaries seem impossibly high to me, and the thought of living in a desert makes me feel very, very depressed.

also what this guy said
I'd take Washington just for the climate

contracting and engineering work for both. so i'd be dealing with locals.

compare the cost of living

110k in cali doesnt sound like much. plus niggers

63k in a town w/o a stoplight would likely put you on the top of city

go for WA

Yeah I'd go for Washington then
I'm not from the US, but I hear California is expensive , so you'd probably be saving more there in the long run.

Which city in WA?

Lmao no wonder biz is so poor. Take the 110k you idiot and then leverage into a 120k job in a better location. Taking a 50k pay cut because you don't like the area.. everywhere in California has somewhere nice nearby just commute 45 minutes if it bothers you so much. The jobs are not the same if there is a 50k differential.

>110k$ a year to work in some nigger infested california ghetto
>or

the 2nd one

I live in commiefornia, and it's a hellhole. Stay out at all costs.

Jew detected.

I love small towns. I say WA.

If your really unsure find a cheap flight to each. Give each one a weekend trip.

>The jobs are not the same if there is a 50k differential.

the only difference is the scale. i'm basically a glorified maintenance guy. the place in california just has more square footage.

Randle

Cali has a retardedly high cost of living, you'll prob make more money in Washington. Just compare the housing prices

I'm currently living pretty happily in Seattle on about 55k.

Fucking lot of socialist shits here but your logging town should be better. Very few niggs. Even our nigs aren't that niggy.

nigger infested ghetto for 110k a year and 500k a year in stolen evidence

One bedroom apartment in San Jose: $2000 a month
One bedroom apartment in Bumfuck WA: $500 a month
Difference: around $20k a year including utitilies
$110k in CA is 74k post tax.
$63k in WA is $49k post tax.
You are still coming out way ahead in California. Even moreso if you invest in a 401k.

Washington any day of the year. Fuck commiefornia

ohh i understand now!

yea man fuck cali go WA all the WAy

Compare costs of living in each area. CA will be higher, but but how much?

Also, is the part of California near cool shit? Do you like going out? Not just clubs or bars, but comedy, theater, concerts, etc? Can you do the things you enjoy in either place?

Tacoma, WA here. The only place for even the slightest amount of networking opportunities is Seattle. But, even up there, you're constantly being overrun by Node.js idiots and SJWs.

What town in Cali are you being offered?

>dealing with locals.

My town of roughly 30 years has 1 blinking caution light on the state highway that is main street. Fuck the extra income and the faggots in cali.

>logging town.

Blue collars greater than liberals in every single way.

Plus less worthless niggers. Racism aside i mean white black or purple niggers. U know what i mean.

>invest
>401k.

Pick 1

Washington gas some depressed shitholes
Centralia and Aberdeen cone to mind
I would rather live in Compton than eureka CA honestly

Poor niggers are better than impoverished white trash, and I'm fairly racist...

yea plus your money is going to be worth more in the logging town and if youre doing the same work in both places you woud most likely be a boss or manager of some sort as making 110k in a ghetto is extremely rare (legally at least)

definitely go with washington youd be laying on your back most of the time as im sure most shit wouldnt be needing maintance and in southern cali people dont take care of their shit or value money especially in a ghetto so they gonna be breaking shit all the time, so unless you get paida commision for each repair definitely take washington imo.

Depends on the cost of living. I'd compare what I the profit would be after the year and pick the place with the higher profit.

thank god someone with decent brains on Veeky Forums who doesnt think all "niggers" are black
like chris rock said its not color its personality
a nigger will steal yo shit and fuck yo wife
a black guy will listen to rap and be cool etc

also def agree with ur views on the standard of living (people wise)

I agree that there are niggers of every color, but aren't non-black niggers just emulating the black ones because they think it's a cool/respectable/right way to live?

>I would rather live in Compton than eureka CA honestly
same af
I lived in Eureka for a year believing /pol/ bullshit that it was a white oasis.
Christ is that wrong. I'ved also lived in Illinois. Honestly the cost of living here is high for a reason. I'd take LA over any city in Washington except for maybe Bellvue,

Dumb violent people come in all colors. Hence them being niggers

The term "nigger" doesn't describe dumb and violent people.
There are many types of such people, for example there are rednecks, meatheads, neonazis, meth junkies, crack heads, etc.
All dumb and violent, but not necessarily niggers.

When people think "nigger" they imagine someone who's specifically part of ghetto black culture.
Obviously not all blacks are niggers, as many act normally (what's mistakenly called "acting white", when it's actually how everyone except blacks acts) instead of speaking and behaving like someone who grew up in the streets of a poor black area, but those who indeed act like that are called niggers.
Not because they're dumb and violent, but because they're part of a certain culture and/or engage in behavior that's considered something typical of these people.

When non-blacks act like that, they're called wiggers, chiggers, etc, but when they're dumb and violent without those specific behaviors they're not considered niggers (or any other version), but something else based on how their behavior is part of a certain group (like those listed above for example) or not.

I would do the 100k for a short time, leave for the 63 k when I want to raise a family.

All niggers are black. You are far better off with the lower class of every other ethnic group, blacks are the lowest of the low.

I'm dealing with a similar set of choices.. Can you successfully separate yourself from the niggers by taking safe routes? Is the crime rate high? Have there been registered crimes directly around your house? What is the cost of living there? In this logging town, is your salary high enough compared to others there such that you can score some goood loggina possy?

>or

getting raped by a thousand black men

no income tax = take the washington job.

first you didn't include municipal taxes
second theres a lot more to cost of living than rent and utilities, especially if you're paying literally twice as much for gas and groceries

black people are sometimes nicer to outsiders then their own kind

flights to small towns in Washington would cost thousands of $

I would not take any amount of money to live in a nigger neighborhood.

That type of living situation is not sustainable, regardless of compensation.

No matter how you slice it - you most likely would come out ahead in Washington.